Reviews You Can Rely On

Garmin Forerunner 55 Review

A basic GPS watch that will be perfect for those looking to track their activities without the advanced features of higher-end models or extended battery life
gearlab tested logo
Garmin Forerunner 55 Review
Credit: Garmin
Price:  $200 List
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Manufacturer:   Garmin
By Matthew Richardson ⋅ Review Editor  ⋅  Jul 3, 2024
69
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#14 of 16
  • Accuracy - 30% 9.0
  • Activity Use - 20% 6.0
  • Everyday Use - 15% 7.0
  • Extra Features - 15% 5.5
  • Wearability - 10% 6.5
  • Battery Life - 10% 4.6

Our Verdict

We are impressed with the Garmin Forerunner 55, and while it doesn't score as high as some of the more high-end models, it's hard to argue that this isn't a great value. With a heart-rate monitor, color screen, and a lightweight design, this is perfect for those looking to get into the GPS watch market. It could also be a supplemental watch for those wanting a lightweight option. You still receive the same Garmin watch interface found on top-scoring models, but with the lower price, you don't receive some advanced health metrics and long extended battery life. Compare to others in our best GPS watch review.
REASONS TO BUY
Simple
Inexpensive
Lightweight
REASONS TO AVOID
Lacks premium health stats
Shorter battery life
Editor's Note: We update this review on July 3, 2024, to follow our new metrics for GPS watches

Compare to Similar Products

 
garmin forerunner 55
Awards  Best Buy Award
Best High-Quality
 Best Buy Award
Best on a Tight Budget
 
Price $169.99 at Amazon
Compare at 2 sellers
$449.00 at REI
Compare at 3 sellers
$249.00 at Amazon
Compare at 3 sellers
$229.00 at REI
Compare at 3 sellers
$150 List
$89.99 at Amazon
Overall Score Sort Icon
69
82
75
73
61
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bottom Line An entry-level GPS watch that does everything you need without the advanced features found on the most premium modelsGreat craftsmanship and design with an updated UI, menu, and AMOLED displayWe prefer a slightly larger screen for enhanced readability, those with smaller wrists will love the Forerunner 165This watch excels as an affordable GPS companion, offering value and dependable accuracyLacking an always-on display is a huge bummer for those who like their like the watch face to be viewable to others, still, this is an acceptable option
Rating Categories Garmin Forerunner 55 Suunto Race Garmin Forerunner 165 Coros Pace 3 Amazfit Active Edge
Accuracy (30%)
9.0
9.3
9.3
9.0
7.5
Activity Use (20%)
6.0
8.5
6.5
7.5
6.5
Everyday Use (15%)
7.0
7.5
7.0
7.0
5.0
Extra Features (15%)
5.5
6.5
7.5
5.0
5.0
Wearability (10%)
6.5
9.5
8.0
7.5
6.0
Battery Life (10%)
4.6
6.3
4.6
5.4
4.5
Specs Garmin Forerunner 55 Suunto Race Garmin Forerunner 165 Coros Pace 3 Amazfit Active Edge
Measured Main Body Size (Diameter) 42.0 mm 49.0 mm 43.0 mm 41.9 mm 46.5 mm
Measured Thickness 12.5 mm 13.3 mm 11.6 mm 11.8 mm 12.0 mm
Measured Screen Width 26.5 mm 36.0 mm 30.4 mm 31.0 mm 33.5 mm
Measured Weight 1.31 oz 2.93 oz 1.40 oz 1.50 oz 1.90 oz
Screen Type MIP AMOLED AMOLED MIP TFT
Measured Charging Time 111 min 84 min 103 min 113 min 120 min
Battery Life Claims by Manufacturer Smartwatch mode: 2 weeks;
GPS: 20 hours
In time mode: 26 days
With 24/7 Tracking and Mobile Notifications: 12 days
Training Mode with GPS: 40h / 50h / 70h / 120h
Smartwatch mode: Up to 11 days;
Battery Saver Smartwatch mode: Up to 20 days;
GPS-Only GNSS mode: Up to 19 hours;
All-Systems GNSS mode: Up to 17 hours
Full GPS: 38 hours - 10 hours with music; All Systems On: 25 hours - 9 hours with music; Dual Frequency: 15 hours - 7 hours with music; Daily Use: 17 days - 15 days with daily stress monitors Smartwatch mode: Up to 16 days; Battery Saver Mode: Up to 24 days; Heavy Usage: Up to 10 days;
GPS: Up to 20 hours
Measured Battery Life with GPS 19 hours 50 hours 19 hours 34 hours 18 hours
Sensors Included Heart rate Heart rate, altimeter, barometer, compass, blood oxygen level Heart rate, altimeter, barometer, compass, blood oxygen level Heart rate, altimeter, barometer, compass, blood oxygen level Heart rate, blood oxygen level
Navigation None Detailed, back to start Breadcrumb, back to start Breadcrumb, back to start Breadcrumb, back to start
Music Options Control only Control only Control only Downloaded control, storage Control only
Touchless Payment No No Yes No Yes - limited
Sleep Tracking Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Water Resistance (Max Depth) 50m 100m 50m 50m 100m
Main Software App Garmin Connect, widgets for other features Suunto Garmin Connect Coros App Zepp App
Compatible with Other Software Ecosystems Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Watch Face Material Chemically strengthened glass Sapphire crystal Chemically strengthened glass Mineral Glass Glass
Battery Type Rechargable lithium ion Rechargable lithium ion Rechargable lithium ion Rechargable lithium ion Rechargable lithium ion
Bezel Material Stainless steel Stainless steel Fiber reinforced polymer Glass fiber reinforced polyamide Dual-color plastic
Case Material Glass fiber reinforced polyamide Glass fiber reinforced polyamide Fiber reinforced polymer Glass fiber reinforced polyamide Dual-color plastic
Strap Material Silicone Silicone Silicone Silicone Semi-transparent TPU
Tools Required to Change Band No No No No Yes
Model Tested Standard Stainless steel Standard Standard Standard
Size Tested One size only One size only One size only One size only One size only
Warranty Offered 1 year 2 year 1 year 2 year 1 year

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Forerunner 55 focuses on providing great GPS watch features in a slim, lightweight package. We are impressed with the value of this model, given its size and offerings. We are glad that this price point exists in the GPS watch market.

The light, small case size of the 55 is great for those with smaller wrists or those looking for a lightweight option. Whether this is your first GPS watch or one dedicated to running and races, we think you should consider this model. Even being one of the least expensive watches we tested, this model still features a color screen, heart-rate monitor, and the same Garmin interface found on high priced models.

Performance Comparison


garmin forerunner 55 - the garmin 55 sports a vivid color screen but lacks the pixel...
The Garmin 55 sports a vivid color screen but lacks the pixel density which is found on the more premium models.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Accuracy


To determine our accuracy score, we evaluated the GPS chipset and heart rate sensor. For the GPS test, each watch was taken on a predetermined 2.8-mile route, and the recorded distance was compared for accuracy. For heart rate testing, a watch was put on each wrist, then, our tester ran half a mile and compared readings to our Polar H10 chest strap. The overall accuracy score was then derived from both sets of results. In order to keep weather conditions as consistent as possible, all GPS testing was done on the same day. For heart rate tests, all watches were secured equally to maintain a similar fit. We exported all data, aligning the timestamps to facilitate a fair comparison between the chest strap monitor and the GPS watches.

For the GPS test, the Forerunner 55 performed excellently, only being off 0.08. While this may sound like a lot on flat ground, our test course was extremely hilly, really testing the GPS connection. For heart rate, the model was +/- 1.68 BPM, off from our chest strap comparison. While both of these tests were very impressive with the accuracy of this model from such an inexpensive model.

garmin forerunner 55 - heart rate analysis between the garmin forerunner 55 and the polar...
Heart rate analysis between the Garmin Forerunner 55 and the Polar H10 chest strap.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Activity Use


The Forerunner 55 is a simplistic watch. While it doesn't have the same battery life, it does a great job of providing a simple, dependable experience. When compared to other watches at this price point, we think others provide better activity usage, but if you are interested in the Garmin ecosystem, then this model should provide all that you need to complete a workout or track your daily health.

This model lacks navigation, so we can't recommend it to those wanting to get off the beaten path, but if you already navigate with another device, then you could need something to track your activities. If you simply want the basics, don't feel like you need to spend more than the Garmin 55. This little watch can offer a great experience for those doing city miles or easy trails. For longer outings, you may want something with some more battery and a bigger, more easily readable screen.

garmin forerunner 55 - the data screens are easily readable even in direct light as seen...
The data screens are easily readable even in direct light as seen here. Due to the small screen size 3 data fields is probably what you want to stick with.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Everyday Use


The Forerunner 55 has a more basic set of features than most of the watches we tested, and therefore, it's incredibly easy to use. The Garmin interface is user-friendly and fairly straightforward after you have a chance to learn their menu system. And if you're coming from another Garmin product, this one will be easy to dial in quickly.

We prefer the dedicated buttons on the Garmin models compared to the Coros counterparts. We find the scroll wheel at high outputs is difficult to handle precisely. If you rarely find yourself switching the data pages or if you use auto-scroll, this could be less of a factor for you.

The Garmin Connect App feels a bit dated, but we had no issues syncing our workouts, even with our test watches and phones connected to many watches simultaneously. Unlike some of the more premium options, you cannot change data fields and settings via the app for the Forerunner 55.

garmin forerunner 55 - the recent update made to the garmin connect app make it easier to...
The recent update made to the Garmin Connect app make it easier to use and view.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Extra Features


This model has a minimal amount of features compared to others we tested, and while it scores lower because of that, it doesn't mean it can't be for you. Even with its low price, you still receive a heart rate monitor, color screen, and some basic health metrics. If you find yourself overwhelmed with features and just want to hit start, we think this could be a perfect model.

Notable Features:

  • Heart rate monitor
  • Alarms
  • Assistance tool
  • Several activity profiles
  • Pedometer and calories burned
  • Swimming features
  • Sleep Metrics

Garmin's website lists the full scope of all the features offered.

We do wish this model had some simple route navigation or bread-crumb maps, but at this price point, that's a no-go. For more advanced navigation, a compass or altimeter is pretty crucial, neither of which is found in this model. But if you find yourself on a known path or aren't venturing far into the backcountry, the Forerunner 55 will fit the bill.

garmin forerunner 55 - the tools found on the garmin 55 - we appreciate that the assistance...
The tools found on the Garmin 55 - we appreciate that the assistance feature is included even on this basic model.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Wearability


Due to the budget-friendly price, the materials on this model are less expensive, which results in a fairly basic design. This is one of the smaller case sizes we tested, so it's great for smaller wrists or those looking for the lightest design. The Forerunner series started as a running watch, and those attributes are still found on it today. It's sleek, slim, and light, perfect for running.

The color screen is easy to read even while taking quick glances on the move, and its five-button design makes navigation easy and efficient. For those looking for a dedicated everyday watch, you may want a more durable design, but you will pay more for it. If this will be a purely dedicated activity watch, we think this is a great choice.

garmin forerunner 55 - design differences between the similarly priced and featured garmin...
Design differences between the similarly priced and featured Garmin Forerunner 55 and Coros Pace 2.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Battery Life


The battery life on this model is one of the shortest we tested, at a claimed 20 hours for standard GPS mode and up to 2 weeks in smartwatch mode. This will, of course, change based on usage and the brightness level you choose. Twenty hours of GPS recording should be plenty for the average user.

Battery life is a major selling point for the GPS watch market. If you would prefer not to charge your watch as often or if you see yourself approaching that 20-hour mark regularly, it's best to spend some extra money to increase battery performance.

Should You Buy the Garmin Forerunner 55?


We cannot recommend this watch enough if you are familiar with the Garmin ecosystem. If you are looking for the essentials and don't need mapping capabilities, check out this model. While there are not as many health statistics and features as the higher-end models, we are impressed with the sleek and lightweight design. This watch is for users who want a smaller case size, basic GPS recording, and a heart rate monitor to track them throughout the day. If battery life and navigation are important to you, we would suggest bumping up to the next price point. But if simplicity is what you are looking for, we don't think you can go wrong with the Forerunner 55.

What Other GPS Watches Should You Consider?


If you don't need advanced mapping capabilities or altimeter data, we highly recommend this watch. We also don't think spending a bit more for the Garmin Forerunner 165 would be a bad idea if you plan to use your watch frequently. Coros Pace 3 has a slightly better battery life at the same price point, so that could be a great consideration as well.

garmin forerunner 55 - even the most basic units can lead to a great adventure. just make...
Even the most basic units can lead to a great adventure. Just make sure you've got enough battery to last for your entire outing.
Credit: Matthew Richardson

Matthew Richardson