We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
After researching more than 75 pairs available today, we purchased 11 of the most high-demand women's hiking shorts for head-to-head testing and comparison. We've built an extensive foundation to find the ideal shorts most appropriate to a variety of uses and conditions. We focus on comfort, mobility, fabric performance, versatility and style, and durability in construction to rank each model against one another. By including a range of inseam lengths, from short to long, we also hope to cater to a wide spectrum of preferences and needs. From strolls around town to strenuous hikes or bike rides and more, we've tested each contender as thoroughly as possible. Here, you'll be able to see for yourself which models we feel are the top performers and why.
Editor's Note: On November 20, 2024, we took a fresh look at women's hiking shorts, retesting several models from brands like Mountain Hardwear, Columbia, and REI and adding six new options to the lineup, including models from some of these same brands plus others from Kuhl, Patagonia, and Prana. We also reevaluated and reorganized our scoring metrics and testing protocol to ensure the most accurate and up-to-date product review possible.
The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda shorts have nearly everything we look for in a hiking short. They are reliably comfortable and made with flexible, breathable fabric. The wide elastic waistband is easy to pull over our hips and holds its position, while four well-sized mesh-lined pockets hold essentials easily, including a phone, and provide welcome ventilation on warm, sweaty outings. This pair scores high in most of our metrics, notably comfort and mobility, fabric performance, and versatility. From casual strolls to strenuous all-day hikes, we fell in love with the versatility and high all-around comfort of this short. We also enjoyed wearing the Dynama for a range of other outdoor recreation and warm-weather activities, like cycling or rock climbing. The only others to come close are the Kuhl Freeflex 10" Cargo - Women's | Kuhl Freeflex 10" Cargo shorts, but these are more expensive and have a zippered button fly, making them less well-suited to the broad range of outdoor activities we found the Dynama perfect for. The highly sporty, well-priced REI Co-op Active Pursuits Shorts have no problem meeting similar comfort standards, but they just can't match the high standard the Dynama sets for performance and versatility.
The only real drawback we could find in the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda has to do with durability. During our paperclip snag test, there was some fraying and pilling along the fabric. Thankfully, nothing ripped, so the shorts remained minimally impacted. But such basic wear and tear is to be expected, and you may find this fabric shows its use more than others. We suspect as long as you're not engaging in a tremendous amount of thorny bushwhacking, it will probably hold up just fine, even if there is some minor degree of markup from your more aggressive hiking adventures. Our testers counted 11-13 stitching loops per inch of seam, a good number representing reasonably strong reinforcement but certainly not as high as other pairs in the lineup. Overall, we appreciated the added sun protection and DWR water-resistant treatment these shorts offered and how their length never impeded our mobility whatsoever, no matter which activity we wore them to. If you are purely all about style, these may not be your first pick. In that case, you might find the Kuhl Freeflex Cargo, a modern take on a classic 10-inch style, to be a nice alternative. Or, if you like a soft waistband but prefer a shorter, 5-inch inseam, the Prana Kanabs may be the sporty-chic cut with enough aesthetic appeal and color options to draw your eye.
The Hugut Lightweight Cargo is a fairly classic pair of shorts in terms of style. The material is stretchy, and the cut allows for ample mobility, nice breathability, and relative comfort across the body. The poly-spandex fabric is very slow to soak but impressively quick to dry — among the fastest we saw in testing. This makes it a great choice when confronted with surprise rain showers or hard trail days producing heavy sweat. These shorts also did well in our snag test, proving they are well-equipped to ward off the impacts of sharp objects pulling against the weave. Style-wise, their multi-pocket cargo look and loose basketball shorts cut are things you'll either love or not. But it is safe to say the longer 9.5-inch inseam length does offer maximum versatility in terms of seasonality, as you can wear this pair for multiple activities and in varied conditions as the seasons change. If length isn't a concern, you may appreciate the high-performance multi-pocket and elastic-waist design of the Outdoor Research Ferrosi Shorts. Although we tested the 5-inch version, a longer 7-inch model is also available, although it swaps out the belted elastic for a button-fly waist.
The main drawback to the Hugut Lightweight Cargo shorts is the waistband, which is surprisingly tight for an elastic feature and produces discomfort over time. The waistband is made of tightly bunched wrapped elastic with an external drawstring built-in and, in our tester's opinion, is sized small compared to the rest of the body of the shorts. Given the pressure and slight pinching this tight creased fit produces against the skin, the Hugut is not the best option we found for all-day wear. While their general design fits expectations for traditional cargo shorts, with plenty of pockets for stowing essentials, the Hugut's zippers and pull tabs aren't of the highest quality. They can get stuck easily and feel bulky, making the pockets less accessible or functional without introducing a new headache. Overall, it comes down to considering what you need and how much you can afford to spend. With the Hugut Cargos, you're getting an extremely affordable pair of shorts with high marks in mobility and fabric performance. If you are looking for something long but you like the idea of a less traditional cut and more comfortable fit, and you are willing to spend a little more, the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda shorts is our best recommendation. Another option with classic Bermuda styling that is priced somewhere in between and scores nearly just as high is the REI Co-op Sahara Bermuda Shorts.
The KUHL Freeflex Cargo is a great option for trail-to-town scenarios. The fabric has a smooth look to it, and the cut is slim, unlike the sportier, baggy approach as seen in other models. These shorts themselves deliver when it comes to comfort, mobility, and versatility, and they offer a more pleasing fresh style than many cargo designs, like the highly athletic Columbia Sandy River Cargo Shorts or the loose, almost basketball style seen on the Hugut Lightweight Cargo shorts. Our testers found the fabric on the Kuhl Freeflex dried relatively quickly in our dry test, and even in a longer 10-inch inseam, there wasn't a significant sacrifice in breathability. Moreover, we liked the longer length for the added sun protection such designs offer.
On the flip side, we found the Freeflex material to be less snag-resistant than what we saw on some of the other competitors. Also, the sizing on this pair may be a bit tricky for some, at least if you are attempting to determine fit without trying them on in person. While there is some stretch, the fabric isn't going to expand as much as leggings would. Given the cut is fairly form-fitting, these may not be ideal for curvier frames. Overall, if the fit is there, we like how versatile this pair is. They will appeal to those who often combine a day hike with errands around town or for eating out after hiking when they still want to feel cute. If you're not a fan of such long cargo designs but still want something with plenty of pockets that is a bit high-tech and eye-catching, the Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender may be more your vibe.
Weight: 7.2 oz | Inseam: 5 inches (Plus sizes are 9 inches)
REASONS TO BUY
High mobility
Versatile, comfortable fit
Easy-to-use belt system
REASONS TO AVOID
May run small in sizing
Longer dry time
The Outdoor Research Ferrosi shorts offer excellent mobility and have deep pockets, with a comfortable fit you can wear all day. The belt is easy to tighten and undo. The Ferrosi fabric, a combination of 86% nylon mixed with 14% spandex, has a nice stretch to it and fared well in snag testing. It is also slow to absorb water in the event of heavy sweat activities or unexpected downpours, even if we can't say we saw equally impressive results in its drying time — unless they sit in direct sunlight, you will need to wait nearly an hour to clear the moisture. The waistband with a 2-inch wide integrated belt is wide enough to help disperse pressure from the elasticity across your midsection for greater comfort over other models of a similar elastic-waistband design, like the belted Columbia Sandy River or unbelted Hugut cargo shorts. The 5-inch inseam length and wide leg openings allow for an athletic but still casual and feminine look. Sold in several playful and more neutral colors, these are easily worn for more than just hiking. Their unique versatility is a welcome quality that helped elevate them to award-winner status.
Determining the correct size with the Outdoor Research Ferrosi Shorts may be tricky, however. Our best recommendation is to try on multiple sizes, especially if you are in between generally. If you can't, we recommend sizing up to allow for a looser waistband. Since they come with a belt already, you won't have trouble dialing the fit at the waist, and the overall cut is not so baggy as to make the rest of the fit out of proportion. In addition to sizing, we found this pair took some time to dry in testing. This may not be a problem on hot days when the sun will assist in speeding along the process, but in mixed conditions on shoulder season days, such moist fabric could easily turn into an uncomfortable cold. In the end, if you like the tailored fit a belt can provide at the waist, then this pair tops our list among the options we've tested. If you don't require a belt to maintain fit even with heavy use, consider the less expensive REI Co-op Sahara Bermuda shorts, which are more lightweight and quicker to dry, but have a longer inseam.
The REI Co-op Active Pursuits shorts are an ultralight alternative to more traditional hiking short designs. With minimalism in mind and a lightweight poly-spandex fabric for construction, these shorts are all about high comfort and easy mobility — a perfect choice for trail runs. The fabric fared well during our snag testing, and the updated waistband design on this newest iteration is a tremendous improvement from the underwhelming version of earlier models. With its wide-leg openings, this pair offers excellent mobility, making it a worthy option for more than just days of hiking, even if that's their preferred use. A single zippered accessory pocket on the upper right thigh is easy to access and large enough to hold a driver's license, a key, and chapstick, but not much more. This can be a frustration for those looking to stash a phone. If that's you, other lightweight options like the Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender shorts may serve you better. Whether backpacking, fastpacking, or simply jogging local trails, the Active Pursuits are a technical, breezy choice for those who don't need to store and carry much more.
Of course, many hikers want pockets to help them keep track of their essentials on the trail. So, a lack of choice here could prove a big detraction for some shoppers. The REI Co-op Active Pursuits Shorts take their cue from classic running shorts styles, adhering to a minimalist design that enables unencumbered, fast movement without unnecessary weight, bounce, or bulk. There is a good chance such a slimmed-down model won't work for many hikers. But for some, especially those moving quickly or covering significant distances, these are exactly what they are looking for. We should note there is no notable water resistance in the material design, so these shorts will soak through quickly, be it from sweat or rain. That's not always a bad thing on a hot day when you want to cool off, but it does create the potential for chafing or discomfort from the cold if temperatures drop. Overall, we understand that these relative drawbacks are minor compared to the broad balance of comfort and technical qualities they otherwise deliver. While we dislike a lack of hand pockets in general, we must acknowledge such features are not always necessary when you hike with a backpack or running vest. Considering all their benefits, the Active Pursuits are an ultralight dream come true. If you decide you want something lightweight with hand pockets and you're willing to spend a bit more money, the Patagonia Multi Trails could be the pair for you. For a cargo design in a shorter cut, the Columbia Sandy River Cargo shorts can also be a great ultralight option when the belt is removed.
The Columbia Sandy River Cargo is ultralight (4.1 oz without the belt, 5.1 with) and was the quickest to dry in our drying test. Quirky and yet functional, these shorts are technical and relatively easy to move around in. They performed average across most metrics and even better when it came to testing fabric performance, where they withstood saturation for three full minutes — 12x longer than the most absorbent pair in the group — and then dried equally as impressively, taking only 22 minutes to return to finger-dry status. This makes the Sandy River Cargo shorts uniquely well-suited to getting wet yet still keeping you comfortable, should the occasion arise. They also sell at a fairly accessible price. These shorts have been a part of our lineup for some time now, proving again and again that a traditional cargo design can be both ultralight, versatile, and practical, explaining why they have remained in demand by hikers over time. Many cargo styles end up being far heavier in order to deliver similar moisture management and storage results (even if that weight may also include other design benefits). The highly stylish Kuhl Freeflex 10" Cargo shorts come to mind, with a weight that's nearly double that of the Sandy River Cargo but higher scores across most metrics.
On the downside, the Columbia Sandy River Cargo shorts are not as comfortable for all-day wear as some of the other contenders in the lineup. One tester found the high-rise and snug fit of the waistband irritated her skin at the waist, reducing their final score in this area. Testers also found that their mobility was slightly restricted by a lack of stretch in the Perfecta Plus II nylon fabric. While the 25-inch leg opening allows for decent movement overall, the fabric was a restraint when taking large, high steps up the trail. Additionally, each of the “cargo” accessory pockets is relatively small, which makes them less useful for storing the types of items many hikers consider necessities (for example, a phone). Despite these gripes, the athletic, multipurpose nature of these shorts and their excellent performance managing moisture make them a standout option for anyone who sweats heavily under exertion or expects to mix hiking with water play. But if mobility is a must in your decision-making for water-friendly shorts, check out the wide-legged Patagonia Baggies.
This review started with a comb-through of current offerings from various manufacturers. We selected the strongest contenders from an initial group of over 75 pairs. After purchasing, we tested and scored them according to metrics we consider fundamental to this gear category. Our ratings in all these metrics are informed mostly through field testing, which is done primarily on trails in Colorado. Our more in-hand lab tests included a paperclip snag test, a blow dryer test, and a variety of objective measurements. We also wore each model all day to gain a more thorough understanding of their relative comfort, regardless of whether we were sweating up a mountain, sitting at the computer, or running errands. With the average hiker in mind, we wanted to make sure we covered the basics in addition to fine-tuning our assessments of features and nuanced technical traits in design.
We reorganized our women's hiking shorts testing, which is now divided into four rating metrics:
Comfort and Mobility (35% of overall score weighting)
Fabric Performance (25% weighting)
Versatility and Style (25% weighting)
Construction Quality (15% weighting)
Why Trust GearLab
This comparison of women's hiking shorts is brought to you by OutdoorGearLab Review Editor Sara Aranda. Sara is a writer by trade, as well as a dedicated trail runner and climber. She tends to divide her time between California and Colorado, where there is ample opportunity for adventure. As a creative writer, she has been published by magazines like the Alpinist. Sara's background as an outdoor athlete, from setting Fastest Known Times to wandering local trails with friends, has equipped her well to identify the fundamentals of women's activewear and assess the finer points of great performance. As a result, we think you'll find this review to be a useful tool in selecting your next pair.
Analysis and Test Results
The best hiking shorts will not only keep you comfortable but will be the most functional for your outdoor needs. While style and the total inseam length leave first impressions, overall performance matters to us most. These competitors assessed in our review possess unique blends of fashionability, practicality, and feel. All the models we've tested utilize synthetic materials in some way, whether it be organic cotton that has been mixed with sturdy nylon plus a hint of spandex for stretch or the material is entirely constructed of durable synthetic fibers including nylon, polyester, and elastane blended together in various percentages and forms. The use of high-tech materials has changed the game when it comes to all outdoor apparel. Hiking shorts are no different, with high-quality products benefiting from improved performance and fit and even offering a wider range of effective technical features to influence their appeal.
What's the Best Value?
Price isn't factored into our performance ratings, but it does influence our baseline impressions of the apparel's overall value. A lower price is always a plus, even if we recognize that sometimes you may need or want to spend more to get better quality gear. The shorts we recently tested cover a range of prices, from inexpensive unknown brands to higher-priced name brands associated with performance gear across a range of sports. It's comforting to know that the top performers don't automatically come with an enormous price tag, and often, lower-priced options can deliver exactly what you need. The sporty REI Active Pursuits and lengthy Hugut Lightweight Cargo shorts are both examples of high-value options that deliver impressive performance results and sell at a price that doesn't break the bank. The REI Sahara Bermuda score is only one point less than these two, which proves you can find excellent quality and fit at a price near the middle of the pack. The two Patagonia models we tested, the vintage-inspired Baggies and the more modern athletically cut Multi-Trails, aren't markedly affordable, but they also aren't overly expensive either for a brand that offers lifetime repair or replacement services. We think they offer fair value for their performances and reasonably sturdy constructions. This is especially for the Patagonia Multi Trails, which are an excellent ultralight option that delivers an especially comfortable fit and an above-average performance across all other metrics.
Comfort and Mobility
Comfort and mobility comprise a single metric, which carries the most weight in our scoring system. These essential qualities are based on all-day wear, general comfort, fit, the fabric's flexibility and cut, and, therefore, the overall ease of movement one will experience on the trail. In summary, the majority of the shorts we've reviewed thus far have been either mid-rise or high-waisted, meaning that when sitting down or squatting, their waistbands, thankfully, don't drop too low in the back and expose skin. Our lineup includes a range of inseam sizes. The length of a short leg doesn't always impact mobility, but it sometimes can. The highest-scoring competitors don't ride up or bunch on us as we hike, and they also provide easily accessible pockets that won't become bothersome when filled with necessary items such as a phone.
When it comes to sizing, we've noticed that things get tricky with designs that have high-waisted elastic and cinched waistbands, like the Hugut Lightweight Cargo, Sand River Cargo, and Outdoor Research Ferrosi shorts. It's hard to determine how the waistband will feel based on pictures, but our lead tester tends to size up for such models on account of this consistent problem. Even still, such models tend to score lower for all-day wear due to the scrunchy nature of the wrapped elastic at the waist, which leaves marks on our bellies and often requires us to fiddle with or move the waistband around to find a less irritated area for it to rest against.
The Ferrosi shorts, however, were the best of these designs, and its integrated belt system was easy to use. Our lead tester prefers flat knit waistbands that stretch around the waist just like a pair of leggings would. Two of the pairs in the current lineup offer just that: the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda and the Prana Kanab. Other waistbands in the bunch included traditional zipper and button closures, which can be an adequate or even great choice, depending on the specifics.
As mentioned above, mobility scores don't necessarily shrink as the inseam lengths grow. These scores are far more dependent on the elasticity of the materials used in the construction of the body. From technical terrain to an aimless stroll, each short is critiqued on whether or not our movements are hampered by the material construction of the short. Even if a pair feels great with empty pockets, we check to see if things will change once a phone is stowed away somewhere in a pocket inside. Restrictions when we're trying to high-step, like when we are hiking up a steep or staired incline, or even when we're walking about in a casual setting, are big negatives for us in scoring. Based on our experience, if something doesn't sit, fit, or move right within the first few miles, it'll likely only feel all the more annoying by day's end.
The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda handles scrambles and hikes with ease, exceeding any initial expectations. By far, they are the most comfortable and flexible pair of shorts in our test group due to the soft, pliable material made primarily out of nylon, but with the added benefit of 6% elastane for stretch. With an inseam of 9 inches for the size Small we tested, there isn't much to complain about regarding comfort. The wide waistband is simple but form-fitting, contouring easily to fit the curves of the body. Additionally, the cuts for the legs are roomier, flowing with the legs as opposed to creating points of constriction.
What to Know About Wide Waistbands
Having a wide waistband can be more comfortable, but they are not all created equal. The extra fabric can create greater pockets of heat or areas that hold sweat around the abdomen. A light and highly breathable fabric is a must for successfully integrating such a feature into the design without introducing new and unexpected problems tied to thermoregulation and moisture into the mix.
The REI Sahara Bermuda is another example of a pair with a long inseam (9 inches) and relatively slim cut, yet testers found they just aren't as free-flowing as the Dynamas. Though their flexible and elastic fabric allows for unimpeded movement, the waistband itself is where comfort is slightly compromised, as the elastic design traps sweat and is stiffer than other waistbands in our lineup. Some wearers also find the waistband design a little strange due to the inner belt loops that wrap inside the waistband, which then rests against the skin. Not everyone will complain about this, but it could be a nuisance enough that some wearers will want to take a careful look before making a final decision, especially if you plan to carry a heavy pack.
Be Sure to Assess Comfort and Fit with Your Pack
It is important to consider how any pair of hiking shorts might feel beneath a backpack with a hip belt since that is not an uncommon scenario on many hikes. Long-term comfort may be drastically impacted if your waistband is bulked up with large buttons, thick belt loops, or a hefty zipper. Similarly, an elastic waist that is already prone to a tight fit and pressure marks on the abdomen may become insufferable if sitting below a hip belt weighed down by a pack for too long.
In testing, we pay attention to how often, if at all, we have to adjust our shorts to maintain comfort and full range of motion, especially when going uphill. The Patagonia Baggies have a slightly thicker fabric than many of the others in the lineup, and they tended to rise up on us in testing, creating an unwanted wedgie situation. There isn't as much stretch in the fabric itself, and there is a degree of constriction that occurs with high-stepping despite their very wide leg openings. The result can be annoying as you start to cover distance and continually have to reposition your shorts to sit properly.
Besides the impressive performance of the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda shorts, other models that performed well in this metric are the KUHL Freeflex Cargo, the REI Active Pursuits, the Patagonia Multi Trails, and the Outdoor Research Ferrosi Shorts. Each of these has a distinctly different design, but they all provide excellent stretch to facilitate movement and are cut to fit our bodies well once the initial question of sizing is figured out. We can easily wear any one of them all day long.
The Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender, Prana Kanab, and Columbia Sandy River Cargo are all somewhat middle of the road or just above average due to drawbacks in waistband design, fit, or elasticity. With their recent update, however, the Patagonia Baggies have upgraded their waistband design slightly by incorporating a softer, more comfortable elastic around the middle, an improvement we applaud. Yet this wasn't enough of a change to carry the pair to new heights in scoring. They remain ranked low compared to other high-quality models that garnered attention for excellent comfort and fit.
One other notable update among products carried over from our previous lineup is found on the REI Active Pursuits, where a newly reconfigured waistband — still wide in size and including an internal drawstring, but now built of a thinner fabric better aligned with the material design of the rest of the shorts — and the addition of an accessory pocket rather than just a solitary keyhole, are welcomed improvements on an already impressive design. Our testers love this change and note the Active Pursuits are at the top of the list in this metric.
Fabric Performance
This metric takes a look at the fabric used from multiple perspectives, considering the general breathability of the shorts, venting features, soak and dry times, and any extra perks that may be incorporated to improve the overall performance of the shorts, including sun protection, durable water repellant (DWR) treatment, or odor control technologies. To start our assessment, we first took a high-level view of the materials used in the construction of the products in our lineup. With the exception of the Prana Kanab's, nearly every fabric is some sort of synthetic or synthetic blend. While the specific percentages of component materials vary quite a bit across the collection, the mixtures all imply some degree of stretch, breathability, quick-dry, and/or wicking benefits, although not every model incorporates specific water repellency or sun protection treatments.
It can be helpful to understand why some material options may be chosen over others. Polyester can take many forms with wildly diverse results, but generally speaking, it is known for its quick-dry and moisture-wicking properties, which can come at the expense of breathability unless otherwise accounted for in the design. Nylon is known for its exceptionally smooth, light, durable, moisture-wicking nature but can also struggle with breathability unless specifically accounted for in the weave of the fabric and the final design. While nylon has some stretch to it, nothing compares to what spandex/elastane can deliver, even if, once again, the tradeoff is potentially even less breathability than nylon. Our test team generally prefers shorts that keep us cool and dry when hiking, but we also understand that certain shorts may only be designed for niche uses or specific environments. So, while our final test results account for a range of fabric performance requirements, it is important to establish your own guidelines based on exactly what will serve you best.
Breathability is one of our top considerations when evaluating fabric performance. It is crucial for body temperature regulation when hiking, but it is also hard to measure. So, our submetric evaluations for this feature are largely based on what we've seen and experienced during field testing. A secondary in-hand test is also conducted to reaffirm our subjective field assessments. This involves gently placing the fabric of the shorts over our mouths to see how well we can pull air through it. This breath test gives us some insight into how air will move through the weave of the fabric, regardless of the cut of the shorts. Our experiences reveal that the most breathable shorts tend to be constructed with lightweight, synthetic blends that are heavier in nylon or polyester than spandex, even if they may feature both.
Our top scorers for breathability also tended to have a high-performance feel while hiking: the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda, Patagonia Multi Trails, and the Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender. Each has a different inseam length and synthetic blend fabric, but all three felt breezy and comfortable when worn, regardless of the intensity of the hiking or how much temperatures warmed up. A significant part of this in-field performance appears to be tied to the cut and construction of the shorts as well.
The Multi Trails model also has a leg opening circumference of 29 inches, the most open of all options in the lineup, and no doubt a significant contributor to great airflow throughout the body of the shorts. As inseams lengthen, leg openings tend to reduce in size down toward the knee. The Trail Senders come in at a significant 27 inches — valuable for facilitating airflow — yet the Dynamas only reach 21 inches in circumference due to the 9-inch inseam that ends just above the knee. Instead, the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermudas rely on their high-tech, synthetic blend fabric (a 94% nylon and 6% elastane weave) to ensure ventilation.
The REI Active Pursuits, Outdoor Research Ferrosi, and Columbia Sandy River Cargo shorts may not be at the top of the pack for breathability, but each still comes built of a lightweight fabric and wide leg openings for extra airflow. The Active Pursuits also have perforated holes on the sides of the shorts for extra venting, something we sometimes see on running shorts but less often in the world of hiking. With the KUHL Freeflex Cargo, REI Sahara Bermuda, and Hugut Lightweight Cargo, there's a shift toward longer cuts using fabric densities that feel less breezy even if they are still pleasant enough to hike in.
Inseam and Leg Opening Comparison
Inseam Tested
Measured Leg Opening Circumference
Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda
9.0 in
21.0 in
Kuhl Freeflex Cargo
10.0 in
22.0 in
Outdoor Research Ferrosi
5.0 in
25.5 in
REI Co-op Active Pursuits
4.5 in
27.0 in
Patagonia Multi Trails
5.5 in
29.0 in
REI Co-op Sahara Bermuda
9.0 in
22.5 in
Hugut Lightweight Cargo
9.5 in
23.0 in
Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender
4.3 in
27.0 in
Columbia Sandy River Cargo
6.0 in
25.0 in
Prana Kanab
5.0 in
23.0 in
Patagonia Baggies
5 in
27.0 in
The Patagonia Baggies are something of a surprise. Although they feature a 27-inch opening at the legs, they are made of a thicker 100% recycled nylon faille fabric, which earns a rather average score for its breathability. The Prana Kanab are mostly made with organic cotton — currently the only pair in our lineup that has cotton — and also feel thicker and less breathable than the others. Yet an average or even below-average score in this metric does not mean the shorts aren't adequate for casual adventures; it just means there are other higher-performing options available.
The other critical component of scores in this metric comes as a result of our soak and dry time tests. For the exact details on how we ran this test, make sure to refer to the How We Test article. In short, we soaked a small section of fabric on the body of the shorts and measured how long it took to soak through. Then we did the same while drying the shorts, recording how long it took to fully dry under a hairdryer set to its “no heat” setting (meant to replicate air drying under average conditions while in motion with no direct sunlight). Some of these results were quite surprising, while others were to be expected.
The Columbia Sandy River Cargo proved the quickest to dry among all pairs in the lineup, with a dry time of just 22 minutes. The Patagonia Baggies were quick to follow at 23 minutes. However, there was a big distinction between the two: the Sandy River Cargo shorts took a solid three minutes to soak through in our water testing, while the Baggies reached saturation in less than half that time. There is a reason that Sandy River was chosen as our top pick for water play. If you plan to slosh through creeks on your runs or want to jump on a SUP after you are through, they are by far the best choice to outright repel water and then dry fastest should absorption occur.
Interestingly, the Hugut Lightweight Cargo and REI Sahara Bermuda shorts are practically as high performing as the Columbia Sandy River Cargos when evaluated based on their mix of slow saturation and quick dry times. The KUHL Freeflex 10" Cargo shorts do well but trail a bit behind all three, coming in at 1.75 min until full saturation and a full 34 minutes before returning to their dry state. All other pairs in the lineup proved far quicker to saturate even while dry times simultaneously slowed. Both pairs of Mountain Hardwear shorts fell victim to such a ratio, taking a surprising 42 minutes to dry. And many other pairs landed in the 50-plus minute zone for the dry test. The cotton-blend construction of the Prana Kanab was unsurprisingly the worst performer, soaking through in three-quarters of a minute and taking last place when it came to drying at 59 minutes.
Our final metric scores are a combination of our in-field testing results plus objective lab tests to explore manufacturer claims of water-resistant and quick-drying features.
The synthesis of our results from each test and product examination described above yields the final metric scores we assign for Fabric Performance. Fabrics used receive extra points for incorporating UPF protection, odor control, or DWR technology that doesn't use PFCs/PFAs ("forever that are chemicals" harmful to us and the environment) into their designs. Notably, these are just the Patagonia and Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda options at this time. When it comes to sun protection, the majority of the shorts we tested have a UPF rating ranging from 30-50. Some may even use a plus sign if the rating is actually above 50. When a model doesn't explicitly state a UPF rating, we mark sun protection as minimal, denoting there is some inherent protection based on the very existence of the fabric as a barrier but that the protection is unlikely to be notable enough to warrant publishing the rating. This typically happens with clothing that has a rating below 15, which is not considered effective UV protection.
Understanding UPF Ratings In Clothing
UPF 30 means that 1/30th (about 3%) of available UV radiation can pass through the fabric to reach the skin. UPF 50 means 1/50th, or about 2%, makes it through. Adding a plus sign, such as UPF 50+, means that less than 2% of UV transmission takes place.
Versatility and Style
A multi-functional design is beneficial to the wearer for several reasons. If you're trying to lean out your wardrobe, enjoy doing less laundry, or live in a place with distinct seasons and clothing needs to accommodate changing temperatures, versatility is something you will likely pay close attention to. Achieving the right balance between functionality, fashionability, and utility ensures you will get the most out of your apparel, so we weigh style into our scoring process to be sure we consider a broad range of goals. Trendier designs transfer well to city environments and can stand on their own as casual in-town wear. They are generally less traditional in appearance, incorporating a more modern or vintage aesthetic, even if they are built to include hiking-specific features and performance materials. The more straightforward, athletic designs might not be considered as stylish in some circles, but to each their own. Some outdoorsy communities or younger shoppers may find such sporty designs to be the height of today's fashion. We also understand that different ages or body types may express different preferences as well. Scoring becomes a tough call, involving a lot of subjectivity. For our part, we do our best to take an objective approach, assigning scores based on the range of potential uses a single design can realistically accommodate, as well as the number and variety of colors and inseam variations available.
We find that the most versatile pairs tend to be those with longer inseams. While style points can prove to be an imperfect, highly subjective metric, we believe longer-inseamed models like the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda, KUHL Freeflex Cargo, REI Sahara Bermuda, and Hugut Lightweight Cargo shorts are going to generally provide more flexibility between trail and city destinations, better coverage in shoulder seasons when temperatures drop, and more versatility and abrasion protection for use in a variety of outdoor activities. They tend to be more practical for a bike ride, too, and provide more coverage for activities like yoga or even bouldering or rock climbing (though this also very much depends on how stretchy they are). The KUHL Freeflex became a favorite for its chic and versatile look, which we think transfers well from trail to town. The Dynama Bermudas were so comfortable and easy to move in that one tester bounced from trail time over to a rock face and harness without hesitation.
When considering style alone, we feel the most striking pair in our lineup is the Prana Kanab due to its cotton-blend fabric and wide knit waistband, which, for us, seems more akin to fashion shorts. This model is sold in other colors, but the earthy grey-blue ones we tested are a cheerful pop of color that looks great around town. Our lead tester wore them often to run errands or meet up with friends and particularly loved how easy they were to pull on and off. The Mountain Hardwear Trail Sender, Patagonia Baggies, and REI Active Pursuits all have a fun, if not also sporty, casual look to them, and each comes in an array of different patterns and colors. Middle-of-the-road points went to the competitors with very athletic or classic hiking designs without any notable adjustments to grab our eyes. The inexpensive Hugut Lightweight Cargo shorts received the lowest scores for style among every pair tested.
Examples of other activities we integrated into our tests include rock climbing, running, cycling, and floor workout routines. Not all of the shorts are practical for every one of these physical activities because of the varied movements each requires, so we took note of where we encountered limitations and why we felt a particular pair could not meet the demands. Since this review is focused on hiking, we honed in on activities that prioritize mobility in the legs. The Patagonia Multi Trails and REI Active Pursuits are examples of how, even in the realm of hiking, long-distance or thru-hiking endeavors may warrant a different sort of apparel altogether. When everything you need to carry will be stored in a backpack or vest anyway, pockets become less critical, while waistband comfort, overall breathability, and mobility in the legs take priority. Our lead tester has personal experience selecting hiking shorts for lengthy through-hikes in rugged terrain (like on the Pacific Crest Trail) and can attest to the appeal of a minimalist, trail-running-inspired hybrid style vs a more traditional cargo or Bermuda cut.
Construction Quality
Testing for this metric involves examining the physical attributes of each short and assessing them all for their build quality and strength in materials. This includes such components as stitching density and the fabric's resistance to abrasion and snags. Some aspects overlap with the key features we assess for the comfort and mobility metric, such as taking an overall look at pockets and the other features presented by manufacturers, like accessory loops, belts, zippers, etc. However, what we are looking for is slightly different, more tied to how these components are built, the strength of the associated designs, and the incorporated materials (versus how well they function or impact comfort and fit). This metric bears the least weight in our overall scoring strategy, but we feel it helps create a more nuanced picture of the products across competitors and, therefore, may be useful to you in your decision-making.
One of the main tests we performed was a snag test. After dragging the factory-cut blunt end of an unwound paperclip across the fabric of each pair of shorts and a section of stitching from each pair, we found that the Outdoor Research Ferrosi, REI Active Pursuits, and Hugut Lightweight Cargo yielded little to no markings at all. These fabrics remained smooth and didn't catch on the clip's tip whatsoever, nor did the stitching loops fray or break when confronted with the same. Next in their order of performance came the Patagonia Multi Trails and Prana Kanab, where we saw faint marks from the paperclip but nothing caught or frayed. All other shorts were left with more visible marks from the scratch test, even if they managed to escape any noticeable catching or fraying in the process. However, there were two exceptions. The fabric on the KUHL Freeflow Cargo snagged ever so slightly when faced with the clip's tip. The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda snagged easily under the same conditions, showing some pilling and fraying as a result. In no case was the damage such that it would impact the usability of the shorts. However, such tests help us gather basic insights into the durability of our apparel and may point out weak spots. It's important to note very few hikers will be outfitting themselves for full days of bushwhacking, even if small scrapes and snags are a likely occurrence along any trail.
To gain a better picture of each pair's quality, we measured sections of the seam of each pair, looking specifically at how many stitching loops were used per inch that we could count. Since each design utilizes different stitching densities depending on the part of the short under evaluation, we collected a range. Ideally, the result is a small spread, showing a uniform stitch volume and quality across the board. But sometimes, as we found out, the range can be more significant. In general, we concluded that 16 stitches per inch reflect an exceptional sewing quality with strong seams. At 12 stitches per inch, we still think the results are great, even if, inherently, the stitching is less strong than other contenders. Ten stitches per inch are still good enough, but anything below that number is when we start to become suspicious of the construction quality.
The two most notable shorts in this regard are the REI Active Pursuits, which are built with 14-19 stitches per inch of seam. The Patagonia Multi Trails come in second with 10-16 stitches per inch. Many of the other models trended near 11 to 13 per inch, with only two pairs yielding a bottom number below 10. These were the Hugut Lightweight Cargo, with 9-13 stitches per inch, and the KUHL Freeflex Cargo, which yielded 8-13 stitches per inch. The highest numbers in their counts certainly helped to balance their overall scores in this metric. However, such low numbers at the bottom can also be a red flag when it comes to assessing construction, in our opinion. Nonetheless, we found reinforced stitching in high-stress areas across all pairs tested, like pockets, belt loops, zippers, and buttons, even if some proved more extensive than others.
While pockets were generally scored as a part of the comfort and mobility metric, we'd like to take a moment to discuss them in the context of construction quality and durability as well, but as more of an abstract factor. The pairs of shorts that we feel have the best combination of pocket size, number of pockets, and strength in construction are the REI Sahara Bermuda, Outdoor Research Ferrosi, and Patagonia Multi Trails. Each pair has multiple deep pockets that fit our phones well, yet the fabric still allows mobility, even when the phone is placed in the front pocket (meaning there is no undue stress placed on the seams or the fabric when larger items are placed inside). The Multi Trails have a bit more stretch, so the weight of the phone did cause some pulling at the front of the shorts. However, it wasn't significant, and we found that the waistband has an inner drawstring to help secure the shorts against potential sagging. The Patagonia Baggies also have two very deep front pockets, but the lack of stretch in the material made carrying items less desirable, even if the seams did not feel strained. Also, the Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda shorts have adequate pockets, but they aren't quite as deep as those mentioned above, so the pockets will have to strain a bit more to hold larger objects.
The competitors with pockets that don't fare as well are the Hugut Lightweight Cargo, Columbia Sandy River Cargo, and the KUHL Freeflex Cargo. Notably, four of the five pockets on the Hugut model are big enough to hold a phone, but all five pockets have zippers that catch on the fabric, detracting from their accessibility. Their pull tabs are also bulky and stick out awkwardly, impacting the overall comfort and leaving us with questions about long-term durability. The KUHL Freeflex has another problem: even with six pockets, there is none large enough to fit our tester's phone. Plus, all the pockets proved a little snug for even just our tester's hands. That means there will be more pull on the seams as one attempts to squeeze objects in and retrieve them. The Sandy River Cargo shorts have two front hand pockets that fit a phone acceptably, but the lack of stretch in its fabric makes carrying and grabbing such larger items a nuisance. The pockets sag under the weight and bounce a bit against the body, leading to questions about the strength of seams and material over time. The two additional accessory pockets are also really small, rendering them practically unusable.
On the other hand, while the REI Active Pursuits may have only one pocket, it is of high quality and made with a sturdy zipper and mesh lining for venting. But it is important to note it is only large enough to carry a few small items, like a key, chapstick, and a credit card or driver's license, and will not accommodate a phone, even with concentrated effort. The decisively small size eliminates the need to test the boundaries of its seam strength by trying to force larger objects inside, but wearers need to consider alternatives, like a backpack or waist pack, for any larger carry needs.
In the end, scoring for this metric captures the testing results and assessment findings from in-hand testing and product evaluations, including a snag test, stitching evaluations, and feature considerations.
How to Pick the Best Hiking Shorts for You
The best way to determine what you need is to imagine yourself on the types of hikes you're planning or aspiring for and the types of days you are likely to wear them on. What type of difficulty? What type of terrain? What is the climate like? How many hours will you be hiking? Are there specific features you need to comfortably accomplish your hiking goals (i.e., number of pockets, water resistance, a long inseam for chafe control, or sun protection)? Will you be making stops before or after, which might benefit from a bit more style or a lengthier cut? Do you need these shorts to work well for you beyond hiking? Once you've determined your “must haves” or “maybes,” then it's easier to gauge whether a particular pair of shorts fits your needs well, somewhat, or not at all. If you just have no idea where to start, we've answered some questions here to help you get started. But make sure to head over to our buying advice article for an in-depth breakdown of what to consider.
What's So Special About Hiking Shorts?
Shorts are shorts, right? In the simplest of terms, yes, they are, and nothing is stopping you from hiking in whatever shorts you already own. But, if you're interested in apparel that is designed to make hiking all the more enjoyable, then there is a difference between hiking shorts and fashion shorts or even trail running shorts. Fashion shorts are made to look a certain way, and more often than not, pay little attention to how the shorts will feel or perform when you're sweating or walking for hours up and down a mountain. Trail running shorts are designed to sweat, but they tend to be as minimal as possible, with a focus on ultralight and ultra-breathable design features, including the materials chosen for construction.
Comparatively, hiking shorts aim to be lightweight and performance-ready while still offering useful features. They generally don't aim to be as minimal in their design as running shorts nor as fashion-centered as those you might buy for everyday use. Pockets tend to be a central feature in hiking apparel, thoughtfully added to make it easy to carry essentials like snacks, sunblock, keys, and your phone. The fabrics chosen may incorporate certain “technology” like added sun protection (UPF rating), water resistance, enhanced abrasion resistance, a stretchy build, or odor control. To better gauge these differences, you may want to evaluate the manufacturer's intention and the descriptive language used to advertise the shorts rather than honing in on just the product name or the product categorization by the manufacturer. Some products are worthy of many activities, with hybrid features that make them a great choice no matter how you plan to get outdoors. Others may leverage some style features but really do not come built with the right material components to serve many users' hiking needs.
Does Inseam Length Matter?
The real question is whether the inseam matters to you. Do you feel more comfortable with a longer leg for coverage or chafe protection? Do you enjoy having multiple cargo pockets? Do you want to be able to use the shorts for colder weather excursions? If you've answered yes to any of these, a longer inseam is likely the most suitable choice. On the other hand, if you fare better with less clothing in general (maybe sweating is more comfortable for you when your skin is exposed to promote evaporation), then choosing a longer inseam may not be ideal.
Some hikers prefer a loose fit that is easy, breezy and stays out of their way when scrambling up steep terrain. But with more exposure, you lose the sun protection and protection from the elements a longer pair would provide. The preference is quite personal. The one catch with a longer inseam in a hiking short is flexibility and stretch in the fabric become necessities. If longer is the right fit, be sure you choose a pair that doesn't diminish your range of motion. The material in the legs and hips should incorporate enough stretch to move your legs easily in a full range of motion, including high steps and sitting down comfortably. Regardless of inseam length, checking for mobility is a must.
Why Is Weight Important?
There are a lot of hikers out there who love to weigh their hiking gear and apparel (us included) to see if they can reduce their loads to the bare minimum for comfort and convenience. Why do we do this? Imagine an empty backpack: it's so easy to carry; now imagine filling it with stuff. Wouldn't it be nice if that stuff was ultralight and produced little impact on your back as you tackled the miles? This desire to be lightweight can also apply to apparel in the hiking world. The longer you hike, the more you feel the weight of everything and anything. If you're packing extra shorts for a backpacking trip, their weight and bulk make a difference. If you're day hiking and want to feel light on your feet the entire time, having a lightweight pair of shorts will feel better than a cumbersome pair, and if you plan to carry things in your pockets, it's nicer when the shorts themselves don't contribute to the bulk of your load. Of course, there is always the potential of going too ultralight. Sometimes, apparel can be so thin that when you add things to a pocket, the fabric sags and bounces uncomfortably, or the overall fit and even durability could be compromised. There is no magic number when it comes to weight, but our lightweight favorites tend to weigh around 4 or 5 ounces each.
Do You Need High-Tech Features?
As long as the shorts are comfortable, flexible, and provide all you need them to provide, you're truly set. When it comes to technical sounding keywords like quick-dry, moisture-wicking, UPF (insert-number-here sun protection), or DWR (Durable Water Repellant) treatments, it's easy to buy into the idea that such perks are a requirement for an enjoyable hike. That's far from the case, in our opinion. For many, they are nice extras but end up playing a nominal role in the success of their overall outdoor experience. However, they are perks that can become much appreciated with the more time you spend on the trail and the more diverse the terrain and conditions you traverse.
Moisture wicking implies that a material is quick to pull sweat away from the body. In ideal scenarios, this is paired with highly breathable features that will cool you down comfortably and initiate the evaporation process as well. Quick drying implies that any moisture absorbed into the fabric, be it from your own sweat or acquired while wading or splashing through water, will dry within a reasonable amount of time (i.e., you won't stay wet for hours). Wet fabric can produce a desirable cooling effect on hot days — many alpine hikers love to take advantage of a lake or river dip to cool off — but when temperatures drop at night or in shadow, wet clothing can quickly turn to dangerous levels of cold. Soaked fabric can also lead to rubbing and chafing against exposed skin. For these reasons, moisture-wicking and quick-drying features are among the most sought-after when hikers purchase activity-specific apparel.
Sun protection is a bonus add as well, diminishing the amount of UV radiation that may penetrate your clothing otherwise and reducing the need to apply sunblocks topically. Having a fabric treated with DWR increases the protection it offers to water. Whether it is rain, sweat, or a spilled drink, a good DWR treatment ensures the moisture will bead and roll off fairly easily rather than soaking right through the fabric immediately. Keep in mind that water resistance is very different from waterproofing. So, while DWR-treated materials are helpful, they will not save you from soaking under consistent downpours or when submerged. While you can get away without any of these features in your apparel and still have a great hike, adding any one of them can improve your experience, especially when terrain, distance, or climate variations demand more out of your gear.
Conclusion
It's easy to get mixed up in the technical perks and stylistic features of all the available options, and we understand we've dumped a lot of information on you. When in doubt, we suggest you prioritize your comfort and mobility, especially if you plan to use your new shorts on extended trips in the backcountry or across technical terrain. Even the most basic-looking shorts can still pack an athletic punch, and the elasticity and breathability of the materials and cut are primary indicators of how well each pair will score across all other tests. Such characteristics impact their feel when on and will determine how successfully they perform in the varied environments you plan to wear them in. Good looks and versatility of style are valuable for any apparel purchase, so shorts suitable to a wider range of uses are also generally preferred. We hope we've provided you with all the necessary tools you'll now need to choose the best pair of hiking shorts for your upcoming adventures.