The 10 Best Running Shorts of 2024

Best Overall Men's Running Shorts

Rabbit FKT 2.0 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	5.5 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.75 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	10.00 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	2.33 hrs

For our favorite men's running shorts, look no further than the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" shorts. These shorts are very versatile, offering superior comfort and a highly functional six-pocket design. The liner and body of the shorts are made of a breathable and strong 87% polyester/13% spandex blend that feels incredibly breezy in stride and wicks moisture very well. The liner is built of the same fabric blend in a mesh weave with flat seams along the edges for maximum comfort. Pockets can be of importance for many runners, and even when they are added, the real-time utility can vary dramatically from pair to pair. Fortunately, the six well-designed pockets on the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" shorts deliver on all fronts, including a well-executed phone pocket big enough to hold our large cell phone during test runs with minimal bounce. Coupled with four mesh hip pockets, we were able to carry along everything we needed and more. Of course, this pocket lineup may be overkill for some; we found the Janji AFO Middle 5" to be a similar performing option for the more minimalist runners out there.

The high price point of the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" shorts is their main drawback. They cost a bit more than the average short in our lineup, but based on their impressive performance during testing, we feel that they are also well worth that extra expense. For runners working with a smaller budget, we recommend checking out the Adidas Own The Run 5" or Northyard Athletic Lightweight Short 5". However, the comfort and utility of the Rabbit FKT 2.0's offer proved second to none in testing, so we think it's worth paying a bit more for a great pair that can carry you carefree over many miles. Another possible issue for some may be the shorter length, as the 5-inch inseam could feel a bit breezy. Not to worry. The Rabbit also sells this same model in a 7-inch inseam and a 2-in-1 design. On the other hand, distance runners who like shorter inseams can also check out the 3-inch inseam design as well. Ultimately, this is an excellent short for serious runners looking for a top-performing short that will deliver comfort mile after mile.

Our Favorite Overall Women's Running Short

REI Co-op Swiftland 5" - Women's

Measured Weight (Size Small)	3.5 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Small)	5.0 in
Measured Waistband Width (Size Small)	3.0 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter - Size Small)	12.5 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.50 min

The REI Co-op Swiftland 5" shorts offer plenty of high-tech features, making them a runner's dream short. Featuring a gridded mesh pattern, these shorts excel in breathability and moisture management. Warm runs and cool runs are comfortable in these smooth, lightweight shorts. The liner is crafted from a soft and breathable fabric that remains comfortable even when wet, effectively preventing chafing in that area. The wide, 3-inch waistband sits securely at the top of the hips, minimizing movement of pocketed items, like the phone you may have stashed in the snug rear pocket. This design has become popular and can be seen on many other high-scoring running shorts. Runners seeking a do-it-all running short that can provide endless comfort, superior moisture wicking, and just enough pocket space will feel right at home in the Swiftland. While we loved the Lululemon Speed Up 4" shorts nearly as much, our testers ultimately determined the pocket design and moisture control characteristics of the Swiftlands to be a tad superior, landing this pair at the top of the pack.

The lone drawback of the REI Co-op Swiftland 5" is minimal. The rear zippered pocket, while functional for smaller phones, is slightly small to comfortably accommodate most modern smartphones, which could be a letdown for minimalist runners looking for a place to stash a device safely. For better storage options, consider the Janji Pace 7" or the REI Co-op Swiftland 9", which both provide ample pocket space in a bike-tight shorts style. The Swiftland 5" remains one of our top picks, offering exceptional versatility for any distance, terrain, or weather condition. The Brooks Chaser 5" is another awesome option for runners seeking a modest inseam, pockets, and long-distance comfort. The Chaser is constructed of slightly thicker fabric, making it a less breezy, more full-coverage choice.

Men's Best Short's on a Budget

Adidas Own the Run 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	4.1 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.25 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	11.25 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.33 hrs

Versatility and utility don't always have to come at a premium price, and the Adidas Own the Run 5" shorts demonstrate this point with ease. They offer a number of features typically seen in higher-end options but at a very affordable price. For that reason, they have earned a spot as a top-value option for shoppers keen to balance their running needs with their budgets. The liner is well-stitched, and the 100% polyester fabric is very light — the second lightest pair tested in this lineup, at only 4.1 ounces — helping to keep us cool during use. Both the liner and the legs of the shorts are quick drying. The rear pocket is also well sized and well placed, fitting our Smartphone with only minimal bounce in motion, albeit with a little bit of effort upfront to stash it. All things considered, the Adidas Own the Run performs well and provides reasonable utility everywhere else.

While the Adidas Own the Run shorts do perform well, other higher-end shorts bested them in testing, particularly when it came to versatility and breathability. With that said, you do get what you pay for and then some. These shorts will work great for shorter runs or normal gym use and are priced at half the cost of any that outdid them in any performance metric. So, while we might recommend another option like the Janji AFO Middle 5" or Patagonia Strider Pro 5" for race day, for the same price, you can grab a couple of pairs of these for your midweek workouts. We also found the side pockets to be a little insecure, with larger items tending to fall out while sitting or running. So, while these pockets do have high storage capability, their lower security left us wishing for zippers like what we found on the Northyard Athletic Lightweight 5". The contents of our pockets while wearing the Own the Run shorts also tended to bounce during runs, making those pockets only really usable for the smallest of items if you want to maintain your stride. Regardless, this short is an excellent choice for those looking for an affordable run option and a robust do-it-all athletic short.

Women's Best Bang for Your Buck

REI Co-op Active Pursuits - Women's

Measured Weight (Size Small)	3.7 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Small)	4.5 in
Measured Waistband Width (Size Small)	2.1 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter - Size Small)	13.0 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.50 min

The REI Co-Op Active Pursuits is a budget-friendly option that holds its own against more expensive alternatives, scoring impressively across nearly all our performance metrics. It features an ultra-breathable and well-designed liner that enhances comfort on both short and long runs, effectively preventing chafing. The soft waistband includes a functional drawcord, ensuring a secure and customizable fit to accommodate a variety of body types and running styles. These shorts deliver a reliable and comfortable running experience, and REI offers modern colorways to add a touch of style and versatility to the otherwise no-nonsense option. Whether you're heading out for a quick jog or a casual errand post-run, the Active Pursuits short blends functionality with subtle style. A small zippered pocket on the right-side panel is ideal for carrying essentials like a key or gel, making it particularly convenient for everyday runners who value practicality without the extra bulk. There is no other option in our current lineup that comes even close to matching the Active Pursuit's superior low-cost performance. However, the REI Co-op Swiftland 5" delivers a broader assortment of pockets and superior moisture control, and for some runners, those benefits will be well worth the few extra dollars.

While the lone pocket on the REI Active Pursuits offers a thoughtful zippered closure to secure a car key or other small item, we find that this short lacks pocket space overall. Its small pocket may not be enough for many, but it makes the Active Pursuits a budget-friendly deal that works great for minimal daily runs or distance ventures while wearing a hydration vest. If pockets are a non-negotiable feature for you, you'll have better luck with the biker-style REI Co-op Swiftland 9", which offers bilateral and secure phone pockets. If you want a running short that's built in a more similar to a traditional style but still includes functional phone pockets, the Lululemon Speed Up 4" is a fantastic option to consider.

Men's Best Long Distance Performance

Patagonia Strider Pro 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	3.7 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.13 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	11.75 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.33 hrs

Patagonia is one of the most popular outdoor gear brands, and the Patagonia Strider Pro 5" shorts reinforce that reputation with an impressive performance on all counts. Even considering a few questionable design decisions with their most recent update — reducing the size of the rear pocket so that it is no longer compatible with many larger smartphones — our testers report, “The top-of-the-market quality and performance of this model remains unquestioned.” Although the rear zip pocket could not fit our phones during testing, all hip pockets performed so well that we would be willing to use a hydration belt to carry them when necessary. Users with older or smaller phones may find they have no issues with the rear pocket at all. While the pockets on this design are solid, other options like the Brooks Sherpa 5" and the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" offer even more variety when it comes to functional storage options. Pockets aside, this was one of our favorite shorts to grab for a run out of any we tested in this lineup. The liner and body are incredibly breathable and stretchy and feel nearly weightless in stride. This works in conjunction with a large sidecut at the leg opening, making them a supremely comfortable choice mile after mile.

The primary knock on the Strider Pro 5" is that Patagonia has recently changed a few key features of the model's design. Not only is the rear pocket smaller and less functional with larger phones, but long-time users also complain there's been a drop in material quality, calling out the newer version for its smaller liner and thinner polyester double-knit fabric down through the legs. We still love the polyester-spandex blended material used on the body of these shorts, although we admit it may be a bit too breezy for some. Newer shoppers may never be aware of any issues or find merit in the complaints, but loyal fans continue to point out the discrepancies. Another problem is the high price, which puts these shorts out of range for many shoppers looking for everyday running wear. However, our testers were quick to point out, “You get what you pay for in some cases, and these are top-tier quality — well worth the price for the performance.” Regardless of any drawbacks, we loved putting this pair on for all kinds of runs and expect you will, too. If you prefer a longer leg, the Strider Pro also comes in a 7-inch inseam. Or if you just like the way the material feels, you may want to check out another option with similar traits but a longer liner cut: the Patagonia Multi Trails 8". Overall, the Patagonia Strider Pro is a great option for those who want a high-performing short for longer runs.

A Highly Versatile Everyday Women's Favorite

Lululemon Speed Up 4"

Measured Weight (Size Small)	5.0 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Small)	4.0 in
Measured Waistband Width (Size Small)	4.0 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter - Size Small)	13.0 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.67 min

The Lululemon Speed Up 4" is a standout runner-up on the women's side due to its unending comfort, smooth waistband, and versatility. The tall waistband sits comfortably above the hips, while the liner feels nearly invisible during movement. While the Vuori Clementine 4" 2.0 took home our highest praise for having the most versatility, the Speed Up offers a very similar degree of flexibility with a design appropriate for runs and workouts of all kinds. We tested the 4-inch inseam option, which works in tandem with a highly supportive waistband to ensure a secure fit, even when carrying gear in the pockets. With materials designed to prevent chafing and multiple inseam options available, these shorts cater to a range of runner preferences.

The Lululemon Speed Up wasn't the most moisture-wicking in our lineup due to its slightly thicker waistband. In this case, some of the comfort elements integrated into its design limit its moisture control slightly, although it still scored incredibly well overall. The legs are made of a breathable fabric that doesn't ride up, allowing for comfortable airflow and some chafe prevention. If you like the look of the Speed Up's cut but want a short with a bit more security and thickness, the Brooks Chaser 5" is a great option to consider. The Chaser looks a bit more like a true running short and is made of a thicker material that provides more secure coverage. If moisture control is your sticking point, we do not hesitate to recommend the ultra-light and race-ready Janji 3" AFO Middle.

Men's Best Tempo/Racing Shorts

Janji AFO Middle 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	4.3 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.63 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	11.50 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	2.00 hrs

For those who hate the bulky feel of some running apparel, we recommend the Janji AFO Middle 5" shorts. At 4.3 ounces, these are some of the lightest options we have reviewed, presenting a luxurious barely-there freedom that becomes highly evident as you start covering miles. They do not restrict movement at all and feel incredibly airy, helping to keep you cool and responsive on the go. The liner has a smart, rounded seam design that maintains support without chafing. The well-placed stretchy mesh used in the waistband provides great breathability without sacrificing the elasticity required for a dialed fit. The rear pocket of this model is also capable of fitting a phone and carrying it with little bounce in stride, although it could still be a tight squeeze for some of the newer, larger smartphones. All together - the featherweight polyester/elastane blend, thoughtful construction, and superb comfort - inspire speed.

The most interesting aspect of the Janji AFO Middle is the location of the keyhole pocket at the front left of the body near the pelvis. While the functionality of the pocket performed acceptably during testing, we aren't sure its location will work well for everyone. Typically, we see such pockets placed to either side or at the backside of the waistband in order to reduce the potential for rubbing or chafing in the event larger items may need to be stored here. For example, the keyhole pocket on the Nike Stride Dri-FIT 5" is located on the hips, and on the Under Armour Launch Run 7", it's found inside one of the hand pockets. This front-side placement may take a little getting used to. Otherwise, the one other potential drawback our test team noted is the overzealous moisture-wicking of the fabric. At first, this seems like an excellent feature to help keep us dry. However, as one's run time progresses, our testers observed that this same wicking turns into an absorption problem as the poly-elastane material does not dry at the same pace. Once saturated, the AFO Middle shorts took up to 40% more time to dry than several other options in our lineup. Fortunately, the saturation with sweat did not increase to an uncomfortable degree during test runs. And notably, many other top-performing pairs in the test group dried on the body at a similar rate, like the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" and REI Co-op Swiftland 5", demonstrating other positive features often outweigh this complaint. But it's something to be aware of. All this being said, we would still recommend the Janji AFO Middle for runners looking to set personal bests or run fast tempos.

Women's Best for Race Day

Janji 3" AFO Middle - Women's

Measured Weight (Size Small)	3.0 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Small)	2.3 in
Measured Waistband Width (Size Small)	1.8 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter - Size Small)	13.0 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.42 min

The Janji 3" AFO Middle is built for hot, speedy runs. From its ultra-breathable polyester and elastane construction to the waistband perforations to its cut, this is the short to wear during summer races or other occasions when breathability is key. This nearly ideal running short is quick-drying, hence our high-intensity run day recommendation. The well-cut legs provide a full range of motion, while the thin yet functional waistband ensures a secure fit. With its shorter length and thoughtful design, this short allows you to focus on your performance without distractions. But such a short-short is not for everyone. If more coverage sounds enticing, we recommend the Brooks Chaser 5" because of its longer inseam, clever breathability features, and more robust fabric.

Despite its 3.5-inch inseam, the Janji AFO Middle feels a tad shorter because of its full-range-of-motion leg cut. This isn't necessarily a negative, especially on race day. Yet it is worth noting that there is a bit more “exposure” to contend with when running in these. The AFO Middle has two pockets, including one strange little pocket smack dab in the center of the short. Inside, you'll find enough room to store a small item and a small loop to secure a car key, but the pocket's placement is incredibly awkward. Fortunately, the rear zip pocket does better, offering enough room for a smartphone. Our only other complaint with this speed-focused short is that the rear portion of the liner is cut a bit narrow. Runners with narrower hips might prefer this fit, but our lead tester wanted about half an inch more in the width of either side of the liner. The Chaser offers a breathable, wider cut liner, as does the Lululemon Speed Up 4" and our Editor's Choice award winner, the REI Swiftland 5".

Men's Best for Hot Temperatures

REI Co-op Swiftland 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	4.6 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	2.00 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	10.50 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.67 hrs

For running long distances or tackling routes in warmer climates, we recommend the 4.6-ounce (size medium) REI Co-op Switfland shorts. The 2-inch waistband is somewhat unusual for a running short and is more of a taller yoga pant style that hugs the waist without requiring extensive use of the drawstring to dial the fit. This waistband style is also found on the On Lightweight 7" and is becoming a more common sight among top performers. One of the more interesting features of this lightweight short is how the nylon-spandex material across the body has been woven. Rather than standard circular mesh incorporated across sections of the garment, the fabric is woven in a grid pattern with micro-squares inter-connected using a thin mesh to take on a lattice appearance. This also gives them an interesting aesthetic that transitions well between sweaty runs and non-athletic yet still casual environments, upping their score in our style and versatility metric. Breathability is also a huge draw for these shorts, making them well-suited to the hottest of days.

While REI's Switfland 5" shorts performed at the top of the group in our comfort and in-use metrics, they fell slightly behind when it came to pocket functionality and versatility. The rear pocket does fit a smartphone, but not without a bit of muscling to squeeze it into place, making it harder to reach for when you are on the move. The hip pockets are also a little on the small side, proving less useful than some of the standard hip pockets we see featured on shorts that scored higher for versatility. The Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" ended up edging it out in this regard, even if the Swiftlands were still at the top of the pack overall. Ultimately, our testers found little to complain about with the REI Swiftland 5" shorts and recommend them highly to those in hotter climates or runners who tend to overheat. Another option that offers superior performance on hot days is the Patagonia Strider Pro 5". It may also be the better option for those who prefer a thinner waistband (only 1.13 inches compared to the full 2 inches on the Swiftland).

An Excellent Chafe Resistant Option for Women

REI Co-op Swiftland 9" - Women's

Measured Weight (Size Small)	4.7 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Small)	9.1 in
Measured Waistband Width (Size Small)	4.0 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter - Size Small)	6.3 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.75 min

If you are looking for a chafe-resistant biker-style short, the REI Co-op Swiftland 9" is a high-scoring option to consider. With an inseam of 9 inches and only moderate compression, this short offers ample comfort and freedom of movement during runs. Compared to the hyper-compressive Janji Pace 7", the Swiftland is a bit less aggressive in its tension, relying instead on gentle compression, a high-riding waistband, and a functional drawcord to stay in place. Even during runs that saw our testers loading up the bilateral side pockets with phones, snacks, car keys, and dog accessories, the Swiftland stayed in place. Our testers grew to love how the pockets allowed gear to ride closer to the body, which minimized the amount of uncomfortable bouncing as they pounded down trails.

The REI Swiftland 9" doesn't offer the best moisture control. While this lowered this short's overall standing, it did not dissuade us from running in them as often as we could. We tested the “shaded sumac” color (red), and we noticed that sweat became visible pretty early on in our runs. Furthermore, once the sweat was absorbed, it became difficult to pull these up after our inevitable trail-side pee breaks. If an easy-to-pull-up-when-sweaty short is crucial for you, the Lululemon Speed Up 4", the REI Swiftland 5", or the budget-friendly REI Active Pursuits are worthy options to consider. If you love the idea of a biker-syle short with excellent pockets but are keen on a more compressive short, the Janji Pace 7" will likely hit that mark beautifully.

How We Test

Over the last four years, GearLab has bought and tested over 50 pairs of running shorts from different manufacturers. These shorts range in style from spandex-based biker shorts to paper-thin race-ready options. Our reviews represent extensive field testing across both gender categories, with our team putting each pair through the rigors in varied terrains and run types.

We seek to represent the top products on the market, as well as interesting offerings from new or lesser-known companies. All products are purchased by our team, with no compensation or sponsored deals behind the scenes. The final award-winning products captured in this review represent a shortlist of our favorites narrowed down from a field of more than two dozen pairs of shorts, covering hours of research, hands-on evaluation, lab testing, and in-action assessment. Alongside all objective evaluations, like our in-depth dry time testing, our testing teams record data from manufacturer product information and subjective impressions based on experience in use. This allows us to build a full picture of each product compared to other offerings within the same category.

Shorts were assessed with the following five performance metrics:

• Comfort

• Waistband and Liner Fit

• Pocket Functionality

• Moisture Control

• Style and Versatility

Why You Should Trust Us

Our testing team is composed of seasoned athletes who know the value of a solid pair of running shorts. In acknowledgment of the different needs runners of different types may have when shopping for running shorts, we enlist the knowledge and skills of reviewers from each gender to tackle individualized lineups composed of a full range of top-selling shorts.

Our lead tester for men's running shorts is Craig D'Innocente, a lifetime athlete and runner who grew up playing soccer throughout high school and college and carried running with him as a preferred extracurricular activity well into his post-graduate years. He currently travels to various parts of the country as a seasonal worker, most recently serving as a Botany Technician for the Willamette National Forest in Oregon, where forest trails proved fertile ground for running shorts testing. Craig aims to bring a scientific viewpoint to his gear testing, helping to create objective protocols to ensure his final product assessments are based as much on data points as on his individual experience in use.

The men's team also includes passionate runner and all-around mountain athlete, Matthew Richardson, who shares a similar background in both the sciences and in forestry, having both studied environmental biology and GIS (Geospatial Information Systems) and worked as a forestry technician in his earlier years. He now applies those refined data-driven skills to the world of computer mapping, working and playing out of Durango, Colorado. Matthew serves as one of GearLab's running experts across several categories, applying his expertise to running apparel assessments and taking a lead role on our men's trail running shoes review.

Our lead tester, [Ally Arcuri](https://www.outdoorgearlab.com/author/ally-arcuri);, is a cornerstone of GearLab's running content, dedicating her expertise to the women's half of our [running shoe reviews] and exploring the latest in performance footwear. A competitive trail runner and cancer survivor, Ally resides in Los Osos, CA, near San Luis Obispo. Alongside her impressive running credentials—logging over 1,000 miles annually in test gear—she brings a rich background as a PE teacher with a bachelor's in Kinesiology, a master's in Education, and certification as a 200-hour registered yoga teacher.

Jackie Kearney brings over a decade of experience in high-profile track running to her role on the running shorts testing team, having scored several NCAA All-American performances during a competitive college career. After logging many miles over many years, she now knows exactly what makes a well-functioning running short. Post-college, her path took her into the San Juan mountains of Colorado, where she soon transitioned into longer trail runs to support her growing passion for winter sports. Today, she remains an active runner to maintain fitness and prepare for a busy season of ski patrolling and ski touring once the snow arrives.

How to Select the Right Running Short for Your Needs?

A running short is much more than a small pair of shorts intended for athletic use. Many features distinguish a high-performance running short from a broader athletic short, including a breathable and supportive liner and pockets built to prevent bouncing during runs. Before making a new purchase, it is important to consider the type of liner, inseam length, waistband width and type, material, and pocket utility.

Most shorts designed specifically for runners will also be divided along gender lines to accommodate various differences in body shapes and needs. Manufacturers commonly release similar models to both markets, although women's shorts tend to have shorter inseams and often come with fewer pockets. However, very often, the core components and important features are similar. There are numerous running short choices on the market, sold at many different price points and with unique performance distinctions. Although there are a set of key considerations worth evaluating no matter which direction you may choose to go, as with any clothing purchase, we recommend trying on each item before making a final decision to ensure a proper fit and style.

Men's Running Shorts

Our final scores in our men's running shorts review are based on a variety of tests and in-use evaluations. The following chart illustrates the cumulative results of those findings for every pair we tested.

Women's Running Shorts

Our women's testing team puts a full lineup of women's models through the same rigorous testing regime, capturing the all-important female perspective to ensure our results reflect their specific needs. The chart below shows the final scores for all women's running shorts under the current evaluation.

How Much Coverage Do You Want?

Although not always readily apparent to those who are not immersed in the sport, there is a wide variety of running short design choices, with different features meant to serve different needs. The unique benefits of a running short's cut are not always immediately apparent but can nevertheless play a large role in comfort and performance. These include inseam length, leg opening width, and the inclusion (or lack thereof) of a sidecut.

The first thing most shoppers will likely notice is how long or short the legs of a pair of shorts hang on the body. Many newbies to the sport may be surprised at how short some inseams can be, potentially leaving a newer runner feeling a bit exposed. However, there are good reasons why these mini-lengths are so common. Shorter inseams are prevalent among designs meant for long-distance runs, given the unparalleled breathability and freedom of movement they provide. However, there is no question they fall short on coverage for those who prefer a bit less exposed skin and deliver a less impressive performance when moving in cooler temperatures, through inclement weather, or on rough trails in the backcountry. Longer inseams offer the inverse, with valuable coverage to protect the legs in rough terrain and better cold weather performance. For this reason, you are more likely to see the shorter styles on long-distance road runners and on race days than you are on a trail run or at the gym.

It is also important to note that inseams across the board are generally shorter on running shorts than everyday shorts for both genders, but these run even shorter on women's models. For example, mid-level performance shorts meant for women often sport inseams so short they are only seen on marathon designs for men. This level of exposure may not be for everyone. The good news is that many manufacturers now make the same models in different lengths. So, if you love the design in other ways but want a bit more coverage down the leg, you may well have several options to choose from.

Other important performance considerations when it comes to the cut of your shorts include leg opening width and crotch depth. Both of these measurements impact how you move in the shorts. Crotches that are cut too shallow and fit particularly close to the groin can feel restricting, while skinny leg openings can prove uncomfortable for those with larger thighs. Sidecuts are a particularly important design feature of a dedicated running short. When added, this cut enhances leg mobility by creating a wider leg opening to free your stride. These are commonly found on higher-performance shorts meant for runners who are comfortable sacrificing some coverage to maximize their range of motion. But it is important to note a large sidecut is going to be a little more revealing than even just a shorter inseam, exposing a bit more of the thigh each time the leg panels open and the cut expands. This may not be the right design style for everyone and should be evaluated based on your desires.

Which Design Features Are Important To You?

Most running-specific shorts come with some sort of liner (although unlined versions do exist). A liner is an integral feature because it offers interior support around the groin (similar to what underwear might offer) and critical chafing protection. It is an added layer of fabric that sits between your body and the fabric of the shorts, so breathability is key here. This is why many liners are designed with mesh fabric or, in the case of women's shorts, a bit of cotton to ensure good airflow.

Liner seams play a crucial role, providing support by gripping the leg to keep the liner securely in place, but they can also cause chafing if poorly designed or constructed. Shorter brief-style liners will have seams that sit inside the crease at your groin, where they could become irritating to the skin if they begin rubbing and absorbing moisture. Longer liner designs lay between the legs, positioned where the thighs may touch and otherwise rub against each other. Here, the seams are meant to grip the thighs and hold the liner in place as the body moves. In both cases, extra care is often taken by manufacturers to produce rounded or flat seams that hold their places well without introducing any unintended risk of chafing. Strong, well-planned stitching can make a big difference in reinforcing the strength of the liner's grip and chafing control.

Several liner styles exist, with the most common being the brief liner. Longer short-style liners are another style frequently used, with legs that extend farther down to the upper or mid-thigh. These liners are more common in women's shorts to accommodate for the increased risk of thigh chafe, as experienced by many female runners. You will also find compression shorts/tights designs on the market, both of which prevent chafing alone and can be combined with unlined shorts if you prefer. Compression options have pros and cons, with some runners loving the amplified support, coverage, and blood circulation. However, others see the increased heat accumulation and a more revealing fit as a reason to avoid them (or at least combine them with another unlined pair up top). Shorts with liners provide a nice middle ground between tights and briefs, with a modest fit, secure comfort during movement, and solid chafing protection.

Waistbands are among the most important fitting mechanisms available on running shorts. They are usually combined with a drawstring to offer a wider range of fits, even if a perfectly fitting waistband could prevent the need for a drawstring closure altogether. Although not uncommon, shorts with an internally positioned drawstring can end up chafing on the waistline when tied and knotted during a run. It is rare to find a short without a drawstring, as this is among the easiest and sometimes necessary fit adjustment tools, but these options do exist.

Waistbands vary widely in width and construction, with recent trends favoring wider designs. While the average men's shorts feature a 1.25-inch waistband, some in our lineup measured 1.63 inches, with a few exceeding 2 inches. For women's shorts, the average waistband width is notably broader at 2.7 inches. These larger, yoga-style waistbands offer an incredibly secure fit that can be ideal for long runs. However, that fit does not come without its own cost. The extra material used to create these expanded waistbands can hold more heat in addition to absorbing sweat during exertion, which can create discomfort when tackling longer runs. Some waistband designs integrate mesh into the wider-cut waistbands to try and alleviate these drawbacks and take advantage of the best of both worlds.

What Will You Need to Carry?

Pockets are not always the first thing that springs to mind when thinking about purchasing running shorts, but they can prove to be a very necessary feature for some runners. On longer runs, storage becomes a necessity to carry things like nutrition, energy gels, and water. On most outdoor runs, people will likely want to have at least a few essentials on them, like keys, identification, and a phone. Of course, all storage needs could be met by a secondary piece of gear like a running vest, belt, or backpack. However, many of us appreciate the simplicity of a short that inherently comes with good storage, as it makes gearing up for a run that much simpler. Women's models tend to have less storage, following the same broader trends in women's fashion (can you feel our female testers rolling their eyes at this? Just give us pockets already!). For either gender, good pockets are going to be easily accessible and properly sized for their intended items. They will also restrain contents firmly, keeping them from moving or bouncing in stride.

There are many different styles of pockets incorporated into running shorts, including hip, rear, hand, and keyhole pockets. Each style is typically intended for a specific class of item and performs best when used accordingly. For example, rear pockets are often reserved for phones or larger items, protecting the contents with a zipper closure and placed against the tailbone to prevent movement during running. Hip pockets usually rely on elastic for security and are sized for nutrition, like bars and gels or key rings. Keyhole pockets are small openings where one can slide single keys and/or identification or credit cards, and they are usually hidden on the interior of the short. Finally, standard hip pockets are found on more versatile shorts and are usually capable of holding a large amount of items, but typically with lower security. When shopping, you will be best served if you consider what items you typically bring on a run and seek a short that can accommodate your storage needs based on its pocket lineup.

Why Does Fabric and Stitching Matter?

While most running shorts stick to some kind of synthetic fabric, there is a great deal of variety when you get into the specific composition of materials brought together to make the fabrics used in the shorts. Synthetics are typically chosen for active wear due to their lighter weights, wicking properties, sheer feel, and elasticity. Common fabrics include polyester, spandex/elastane, and nylon. Polyester typically makes up the lion's share of a fabric blend, with some shorts eschewing alternate fabric combinations altogether to go with full polyester knits instead. Each of these individual materials has its own properties, with its own unique combination of benefits.

Spandex is commonly used in elastic applications, offering excellent stretch but sacrificing some breathability. Nylon, while less stretchy than spandex, is softer, smoother, lighter, and more durable. It also has great moisture-wicking capabilities and better breathability, even though it may also lack the same support or shape retention. Polyester is highly versatile, with properties varying based on its manufacturing and blends; it is known for its quick-drying and moisture-wicking abilities, but it may also retain odors and have limited breathability.

Manufacturers invest a great of energy into engineering blended fabrics that will maximize all the best traits of these materials for athletic use. Be sure to take a closer look at the tags on any pairs you are considering, in addition to giving them a pull to feel the stretch and having a closer look at the liners and waistbands. It can be helpful to take note of the fabric compositions on some of your favorite athletic gear already at home to better understand your fabric preferences before adding anything more to your collection.

The construction and stitching on the body of your shorts will also have a large impact on the comfort and overall feel of the pair once worn. Construction here refers to not only the different fabric panels and component sections used to build the shorts but also to how each part is joined together. Stitching and seams can be a large source of chafing once you get moving, so it is common for manufacturers to utilize smooth or rounded stitches to ensure an easy-glide finish against the skin. It is also common to incorporate mesh in some capacity, whether that be full panels for the body or within the liner and/or surrounding the waistband. Shorts with mesh are excellent choices for runners who tend to overheat or anyone running in a warmer climate.

How Hot Do You Run?

Environmental considerations (i.e., where will you be running?) and individual runners' personal thermoregulation are also key factors in selecting the right shorts. Breathability is not something you may have at the front of your mind when you browse options, but it can become a major factor in how you feel once you take off for your first run in whatever pair you select. Sweat and heat can quickly become problematic if you are running in a hot climate or if you are someone who tends to run hot, and if your apparel is not breathing well, this can turn from mildly uncomfortable to downright painful. From overheating to chafing, if there is no airflow, you will feel the results. Manufacturers take different measures in the design process to try and mitigate such complaints. Mesh is a common strategy used to allow air and body heat to pass through the material of your shorts. It can take many forms and is used everywhere, from the waistband and liner to the body of the shorts themselves, utilizing varying sizes and techniques. Another way to increase breathability is to incorporate a brief liner rather than a longer version. The smaller-sized liner is meant to provide support using only a limited amount of additional material to reduce the potential for heat retention.

Manufacturers take a similar approach to combat moisture retention. While moisture wicking is a feature many runners greatly appreciate, it isn't everything a runner needs. A pair of saturated shorts can become quite weighty, soggy, and even sag if that same wicking material isn't equally designed to shed moisture at a fairly similar rate. The absorption can not only create an uncomfortable drag while running, but it can also present a big chafing problem, and all such issues will slow you down. Certain materials wick better than others, with spandex performing noticeably worse when it comes to moisture control than materials with a more heavily polyester base. Of course, there is some overlap with breathability in design that should be considered as well since a short that incorporates features to maintain solid airflow will also be better at removing moisture from the surface of the skin, regardless of the fabric. You'll want to consider both material combinations and design choices to assess if a product will be breezy, wicking, and cool enough to satisfy your needs and maintain comfort.

How Long Will They Last?

Durability and care are also important things to consider when purchasing and using running shorts. The thin fabric and lightweight construction of most running shorts mean they will not stand up to machine drying as well, and some may even suggest hand cleaning for washing and drying. Some shorts may even feature a durable water repellent, or DWR for short. This is a fabric treatment commonly used in wet weather gear like rain or ski jackets. Its purpose is to enhance the water-repellency of your garment. However, it does not last forever and may need reapplication over time to ensure continued performance. Make sure you read the care instructions for any pair of shorts you end up purchasing in order to prevent unwanted wear and tear. This is also among the reasons many runners will have several pairs of everyday shorts they use on average training runs and other more high-performance options they will add to their rotation for longer efforts and race days. It's worth considering the intended purpose before making a final selection among all the options.

Conclusion

Running is among the most core human activities and a sport beloved by many professional, amateur, and non-competitive everyday athletes alike. The right pair of shorts can turn any run into much more than a workout. We've compiled a wealth of information to help you assess the leading choices on the market, and all that's left is for you to decide which pair works best for you. Whether you are looking for a pair to get acquainted with the sport or for shorts to wear during your next marathon, there is sure to be something within our lineup you'll like. With that said, we hope your next pair of shorts proves a high-quality asset for all of your upcoming runs.