The Best 10 Running Shorts of 2024

Best Overall Men's Running Shorts

Rabbit FKT 2.0 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	5.5 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.75 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	10.00 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	2.33 hrs

For our favorite men's running shorts, look no further than the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" shorts. These shorts are very versatile, offering superior comfort and a highly functional six-pocket design. The liner and body of the shorts are made of a breathable and strong 87% polyester/13% spandex blend that feels incredibly breezy in stride and wicks moisture very well. The liner is built of the same fabric blend in a mesh weave with flat seams along the edges for maximum comfort. Pockets can be of importance for many runners, and even when they are added, the real-time utility can vary dramatically from pair to pair. Fortunately, the six well-designed pockets on the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" shorts deliver on all fronts, including a well-executed phone pocket big enough to hold our large cell phone during test runs with minimal bounce. Coupled with four mesh hip pockets, we were able to carry along everything we needed and more. Of course, this pocket lineup may be overkill for some; we found the Janji AFO Middle 5" to be a similar performing option for the more minimalist runners out there.

The high price point of the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" shorts is their main drawback. They cost a bit more than the average short in our lineup, but based on their impressive performance during testing, we feel that they are also well worth that extra expense. For runners working with a smaller budget, we recommend checking out the Adidas Own The Run 5" or Northyard Athletic Lightweight Short 5". However, the comfort and utility of the Rabbit FKT 2.0's offer proved second to none in testing, so we think it's worth paying a bit more for a great pair that can carry you carefree over many miles. Another possible issue for some may be the shorter length, as the 5-inch inseam could feel a bit breezy. Not to worry. The Rabbit also sells this same model in a 7-inch inseam and a 2-in-1 design. On the other hand, distance runners who like shorter inseams can check out the 3-inch inseam design as well. Ultimately, this is an excellent short for serious runners looking for a top-performing short that will deliver comfort mile after mile.

Best Daily Driver Women's Running Short

REI Co-op Swiftland Running Shorts - Women's

Pockets	3
Inseam Length Tested	5"
Measured Weight (size M)	3.7 oz
Interior Liner Type	Brief
Material	Nylon, Spandex

There are many things to love about the REI Co-op Swiftland Running Shorts. With its striking gridded mesh pattern, these shorts are extra breathable and manage moisture well, making them particularly excellent performers in hot and humid weather, as well as anywhere else your running routes may take you. The liner is made of a wonderfully soft and breathable poly-spandex fabric that, even when soaked through, still retained its comfort and prevented chafing. In addition, the unusually large 2-inch width of the waistband provides a great fit at the top of the hips, ensuring items placed in the pockets can be carried with minimal shifting. Many runners have started to appreciate the benefits of such large waistbands, and we are beginning to see more of them on the market, as we do on the On Running 3.5" Shorts, which integrates a similarly wide waistband with a shorter performance-oriented design.

Drawbacks on the REI Co-op Swiftland are few and far between. The most striking of these is found in the pockets of the shorts. While each of the three pockets holds items well enough when they fit inside properly, we found the rear zippered pocket barely large enough to carry a modern smartphone. It may still be a nice size for other run necessities, but minimalist runners may be disappointed to find it lacks enough space to stash such an essential comfortably. If you require better storage options for your runs, consider the New Balance Impact 5". On race days or on long training runs, you may prefer a shorter inseam than what the Swiftland line can offer (you'll find only 5- and 7-inch options here). Fortunately, several other shorter yet highly breathable pairs in our lineup will fit the bill nicely if pockets are a priority and you can afford to spend a bit more, including the Lululemon Speed Up and Patagonia Strider Shorts. Overall, the REI Swiftland is one of the first pairs we reach for regardless of distance, terrain, or weather.

Men's Best Short's on a Budget

Adidas Own the Run 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	4.1 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.25 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	11.25 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.33 hrs

Versatility and utility don't always have to come at a premium price, and the Adidas Own the Run 5" shorts demonstrate this point with ease. They offer a number of features typically seen in higher-end options but at a very affordable price. For that reason, they have earned a spot as a top-value option for shoppers keen to balance their running needs with their budgets. The liner is well-stitched, and the 100% polyester fabric is very light — these are the second lightest pair tested in this lineup, at only 4.1 ounces — helping to keep us cool during use. Both the liner and the legs of the shorts are quick drying. The rear pocket is also well sized and well placed, fitting our Smartphone with only minimal bounce in motion, albeit with a little bit of effort upfront to stash it. All things considered, the Adidas Own the Run performs well and provides reasonable utility everywhere else.

While the Adidas Own the Run shorts do perform well, other higher-end shorts bested them in testing, particularly when it came to versatility and breathability. With that said, you do get what you pay for and then some. These shorts will work great for shorter runs or normal gym use and are priced at half the cost of any that outdid them in any performance metric. So, while we might recommend another option like the Janji AFO Middle 5" or Patagonia Strider Pro 5" for race day, for the same price, you can grab a couple of pairs of these for your midweek workouts. We also found the side pockets to be a little insecure, with larger items tending to fall out while sitting or running. So, while these pockets do have high storage capability, their lower security left us wishing for zippers like what we found on the Northyard Athletic Lightweight 5". The contents of our pockets while wearing the Own the Run shorts also tended to bounce during runs, making those pockets only really usable for the smallest of items if you want to maintain your stride. Regardless, this short is an excellent choice for those looking for an affordable run option and a robust do-it-all athletic short.

Women's Best Bang for Your Buck

New Balance Impact 5" - Women's

Pockets	3
Inseam Length Tested	5"
Measured Weight (size M)	4.8 oz
Interior Liner Type	Brief
Material	Polyester, Spandex

The New Balance Impact 5" is one of our favorite mid-range shorts. Its extra-wide waistband, as well as the three-pocket lineup, including a rear phone pocket, are all features that usually show up on higher-end models, yet this pair sells at a very accessible price and still performs quite well on test runs. We love how the continuous loop drawstring through the waistband ensures that the shorts hug the waist perfectly and help to prevent items in the pockets from bouncing once you get moving. We also appreciate how the smooth-seamed liner, in conjunction with a longer inseam, prevents chafing between the thighs on longer runs. The New Balance Impact is built of a heavier fabric than some more performance-oriented pairs, making them a bit slower to dry once the sweat really kicks in. If you want the best of all worlds, the REI Co-op Swiftland running shorts feature a waistband of a similar style but are cut with a much thinner fabric. But altogether, the Impact 5" is a great option for runners who want a solid pair of shorts without emptying their wallets.

At 4.8 ounces, the New Balance Impact 5" are among the four heaviest pairs in our lineup. Although priced quite well for the impressive performance they deliver, we recognize some minimalist runners focused on speed will be looking for lighter-weight options. In that case, we'd point you toward the Patagonia Strider Shorts, which weigh in at an impressive 3.0 oz — the lowest we saw in testing. The large waistband on the Impact also tends to soak up moisture, and the shorts dry slower overall than other options in testing. For better moisture-wicking and quick-dry performance in a 5-inch short, the REI Co-op Swiftland Shorts can't be beat. Or, if you prefer more coverage but quick-dry capabilities, the Brooks Chaser 7" might be just what you need. Similarly, those with speed on the mind may like the Lululemon Speed Up, which has a large waistband and a superior drying speed and comes in a shorter 2.5-inch inseam. Otherwise, despite these couple of minor flaws, we loved how the New Balance Impact 5" shorts felt on our test runs and equally loved that they sell in several striking colorways.

Men's Best Long Distance Performance

Patagonia Strider Pro 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	3.7 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.13 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	11.75 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.33 hrs

Patagonia is one of the most popular outdoor gear brands, and the Patagonia Strider Pro 5" shorts reinforce that reputation with an impressive performance on all counts. Even in consideration of questionable design decisions with their most recent update — reducing the size of the rear pocket so that it is no longer compatible with many larger smartphones — our testers report, “The top-of-the-market quality and performance of this model remains unquestioned.” Although the rear zip pocket could not fit our phones during testing, all hip pockets performed so well that we would be willing to use a hydration belt to carry them when necessary. Users with older or smaller phones may find they have no issues with the rear pocket at all. While the pockets on this design are solid, other options like the Brooks Sherpa 5" and the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" offer even more variety when it comes to functional storage options. Pockets aside, this was one of our favorite shorts to grab for a run out of any we tested in this lineup. The liner and body are incredibly breathable and stretchy and feel nearly weightless in stride. This works in conjunction with a large sidecut at the leg opening, making them a supremely comfortable choice mile after mile.

The primary knock on the Strider Pro 5" is that Patagonia has recently changed a few key features of the model's design. Not only is the rear pocket smaller and less functional with larger phones, but long-time users also complain there's been a drop in material quality, calling out the newer version for its smaller liner and thinner polyester double-knit fabric down through the legs. We still love the polyester-spandex blended material used on the body of these shorts, although we admit it may be a bit too breezy for some. Newer shoppers may never be aware of any issues or find merit in the complaints, but loyal fans continue to point out the discrepancies. Another problem is the high price, which puts these shorts out of range for many shoppers looking for everyday running wear. However, our testers were quick to point out, “You get what you pay for in some cases, and these are top-tier quality — well worth the price for the performance.” Regardless of any drawbacks, we loved putting this pair on for all kinds of runs and expect you will, too. If you prefer a longer leg, the Strider Pro also comes in a 7-inch inseam. Or if you just like the way the material feels, you may want to check out another option with similar traits but a longer liner cut: the Patagonia Multi Trails 8". Overall, the Patagonia Strider Pro is a great option for those who want a high-performing short for longer runs.

Women's Best for Long Runs

Lululemon Speed Up

Pockets	2
Inseam Length Tested	2.5"
Measured Weight (size M)	3.9 oz
Interior Liner Type	Brief
Material	Polyester, Nylon, Lycra, Elastane

On longer runs, sweat is an inevitability, so you need a pair of shorts that are able to wick that moisture away and quick-dry in a breeze to keep you chafe-free and cool. The Lululemon Speed Up was at the top of the list of products tested that managed to handle this task with ease, making it one of our favorite choices for big mileage. The body of the shorts is made up of a lightweight crepe-style recycled polyester-elastane fabric, and a stretchy 2.5-inch nylon-Lycra waistband sits perfectly around the hips. Each component, including the elasticized inner brief, dried very quickly while in use, outdoing or matching all other material combinations we saw throughout testing. We particularly loved the elastic edging of the liner that lays flat against the skin during use, helping to make this the most comfortable liner of the group. Curved seams and overlapping fabric panels help to make this short as stylish as it is comfortable. The only other performance shorts model that could match its moisture management and speed in drying was the Patagonia Strider, but with fewer pockets and a less versatile, more exposed cut, the lower-cost Lululemon Speed Up will make more sense for many runners tackling distance at home.

We struggled to find flaws with these carefully designed and well-executed shorts. But we will note that they are short. Not everyone is going to be comfortable with such limited coverage and little protection. Runners prone to chafing may want to consider the 4-inch inseam version, as the 2.5-inch length does not offer much in the way of a barrier between the thighs. The Lululemon Speed Up is also fairly expensive when compared to some of the other reasonably high-performing options in the lineup, even if it is fairly in line with all of the top-scoring models. With this in mind, we would direct budget-conscious shoppers to the New Balance Impact 5" for an excellent pair of daily runners. Another budget option we particularly enjoyed for casual runs as well as hikes and gym workouts was the REI Co-op Active Pursuits. Ultimately, the Lululemon Speed Up is an elite quick-drying, lightweight option ideal for long efforts.

Men's Best Tempo/Racing Shorts

Janji AFO Middle 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	4.3 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	1.63 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	11.50 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	2.00 hrs

For those who hate the bulky feel of some running apparel, we recommend the Janji AFO Middle 5" shorts. At 4.3 ounces, these are some of the lightest options we have reviewed, presenting a luxurious barely-there freedom that becomes highly evident as you start covering miles. They do not restrict movement at all and feel incredibly airy, helping to keep you cool and responsive on the go. The liner has a smart, rounded seam design that maintains support without chafing. The well-placed stretchy mesh used in the waistband provides great breathability without sacrificing the elasticity required for a dialed fit. The rear pocket of this model is also capable of fitting a phone and carrying it with little bounce in stride, although it could still be a tight squeeze for some of the newer, larger smartphones. All together, the featherweight polyester/elastane blend, thoughtful construction, and superb comfort inspire speed.

The most interesting aspect of the Janji AFO Middle is the location of the keyhole pocket at the front left of the body near the pelvis. While the functionality of the pocket performed acceptably during testing, we aren't sure its location will work well for everyone. Typically, we see such pockets placed to either side or at the backside of the waistband in order to reduce the potential for rubbing or chafing in the event larger items may need to be stored here. For example, the keyhole pocket on the Nike Stride Dri-FIT 5" is located on the hips, and on the Under Armour Launch Run 7", it's found inside one of the hand pockets. This front-side placement may take a little getting used to. Otherwise, the one other potential drawback our test team noted is the overzealous moisture-wicking of the fabric. At first, this seems like an excellent feature to help keep us dry. However, as one's run time progresses, our testers observed that this same wicking turns into an absorption problem as the poly-elastane material does not dry at the same pace. Once saturated, the AFO Middle shorts took up to 40% more time to dry than several other options in our lineup. Fortunately, the saturation with sweat did not increase to an uncomfortable degree during test runs. And notably, many other top-performing pairs in the test group dried on the body at a similar rate, like the Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" and REI Co-op Swiftland 5", demonstrating other positive features often outweigh this complaint. But it's something to be aware of. All this being said, we would still recommend the Janji AFO Middle for runners looking to set personal bests or run fast tempos.

Women's Best for Resisting Chafing

On Running Shorts - Women's

Pockets	1
Inseam Length Tested	3.5"
Measured Weight (size M)	5.2 oz
Interior Liner Type	Shorts
Material	Nylon, Elastane

The On Running Shorts - Women's features a smooth, wide waistband with a simple single-pocket design that easily fits a smartphone and even includes a key loop to prevent keys from shifting inside. This is similar in style to the large waistband style also seen on the high-performing New Balance Impact 5"and is increasingly becoming one of the common denominators of our top favorite models. Extending from the well-designed waistband is a lengthy liner made of an even stretchier recycled polyamide-elastane fabric than what is seen in the body. This adds a secure protective layer with admirable coverage, ensuring the liner stays put and doesn't ride up even during long runs. A similar yet less stretchy and more flowy, quick-drying polyamide-elastane fabric is used to construct the body, laid out in clean panels to create a flattering cut.

We were big fans of the On Running Shorts, but no piece of gear is without its demerits. Even though the liner dries quickly and wicks moisture well, the extra material incorporated into the design inherently creates more surface area that will need to dry once the sweat starts. Testers found that while these were not the slowest to dry on the line or on the body, they certainly were not the fastest. If you are headed out on a long run on a hot day, be warned you'll likely show the results across your bottom half by the time you are done. A darker colorway may be the right choice to avoid unwanted attention on such days. Another option for especially warmer runs is the Lululemon Speed Up, which we found to be very quick drying with great airflow. The On Running Shorts are also among the priciest in our current test collection, and this may make them an impractical option for shoppers looking to fill out their closest on a budget. For many, it may make more sense to grab a few pairs of something less specialized, like the REI Co-op Active Pursuits, and then incorporate a couple of pricier performance models like these into the mix for longer days. Critiques aside, these are a thoughtfully designed, well-executed selection perfect for runners prone to chafing or who just prefer extended coverage.

Men's Best for Hot Temperatures

REI Co-op Swiftland 5"

Measured Weight (Size Medium)	4.6 oz
Measured Inseam Length (Size Medium)	5.00 in
Measured Waistband Width	2.00 in
Measured Leg Opening (Diameter)	10.50 in
Dry Time Test Results - Clothesline	1.67 hrs

For running long distances or tackling routes in warmer climates, we recommend the 4.6-ounce (size medium) REI Co-op Switfland shorts. The 2-inch waistband is somewhat unusual for a running short and is more of a taller yoga pant style that hugs the waist without requiring extensive use of the drawstring to dial the fit. This waistband style is also found on the On Lightweight 7" and is becoming a more common sight among top performers. One of the more interesting features of this lightweight short is the way that the nylon-spandex material across the body has been woven. Rather than standard circular mesh incorporated across sections of the garment, the fabric is woven in a grid pattern with micro-squares inter-connected using a thin mesh to take on a lattice appearance. This also gives them a very interesting aesthetic that transitions well between sweaty runs and non-athletic yet still casual environments, upping their score in our style and versatility metric. Breathability is also a huge draw for these shorts, making them well-suited to the hottest of days.

While REI's Switfland 5" shorts performed at the top of the group in our comfort and in-use metrics, they fell slightly behind when it came to pocket functionality and versatility. The rear pocket does fit a smartphone, but not without a bit of muscling to squeeze it into place, making it harder to reach for when you are on the move. The hip pockets are also a little on the small side, proving less useful than some of the standard hip pockets we see featured on shorts that scored higher for versatility. The Rabbit FKT 2.0 5" ended up edging it out in this regard, even if the Swiftlands were still at the top of the pack overall. Ultimately, our testers found little to complain about with the REI Swiftland 5" shorts and recommend them highly to those in hotter climates or runners who tend to overheat. Another option that offers superior performance on hot days is the Patagonia Strider Pro 5". It may also be the better option for those who prefer a thinner waistband (only 1.13 inches compared to the full 2 inches on the Swiftland).

Women's Best for the Minimalist

Patagonia Strider Shorts - Women's

Pockets	1
Inseam Length Tested	3.5"
Measured Weight (size M)	3.0 oz
Interior Liner Type	Brief
Material	Polyester, Nylon, Spandex

For those who prefer no-nonsense performance, the Patagonia Strider is a sleek and lightweight option — at only 3 ounces, this is the lightest pair in the lineup. The mid-length 3.5-inch inseam is unrestrictive, and the body of the shorts is flowy and stretchy enough to feel like nothing during a run. Such minimalism is also echoed in the 2.5-inch version of the LuluLemon Speed Up if you want to shave another half-inch off. The waistband of the Patagonia Strider is built with a low-rise infinity drawstring design, which lays flat against the body and adjusts easily to obtain the perfect fit. The primary quick-drying polyester-spandex fabric, built with a four-way stretch weave and a DWR water-repellant treatment, moves fluidly with the body. Underneath, the liner is made of a recycled polyester double knit with a miDori bioSoft treatment for added wicking and softness. The combination does a great job of delivering a stabilizing, protective layer to keep you dry. The cut of the shorts is also quite flattering, with a tapered side slit that enhances their look as well as their comfort and mobility.

Due to their minimalist design, the Patagonia Strider does not offer a ton of storage. While the most recent version now includes more pockets than the previous model, including a rear waistband option large enough to accommodate a phone and two small pockets on the side, they are small in size and accommodate fewer essentials for an average run compared with what other models in the lineup can handle. But if you only plan to carry a key, a credit card, and a smaller phone, you may find they are satisfactory for your needs. The double hem of Strider Pro may also create a chafing issue where the thighs and hem touch. However, this may not be a problem for every runner. If chafing is a sticking point for you, consider the New Balance Impact 5", which includes great chafing control. Or, for more pockets and an excellent all-around design, give the REI Co-op Swiftlands a closer look. But, if you love simple and featherlight shorts, the Patagonia Strider is our recommendation for no-frills comfort and performance.

How We Test

Over the last four years, GearLab has bought and tested over 40 pairs of running shorts from many different manufacturers in a whole range of styles. Our reviews represent extensive field testing across both gender categories, with our team putting each pair through the rigors in varied terrains and run types.

We seek to represent the top products on the market, as well as interesting offerings from new or lesser-known companies. All products are purchased by our team, with no compensation or sponsored deals behind the scenes. The final award-winning products captured in this review represent a shortlist of our favorites narrowed down from a field of more than two dozen pairs of shorts, covering hours of research, hands-on evaluation, lab testing, and in-action assessment. Alongside all objective evaluations — like our in-depth dry time testing — our test team also records data from manufacturer product information and subjective impressions based on experience in use. This allows us to build a full picture of each product as compared with other offerings within the same category.

Shorts were assessed with the following five performance metrics:

• Comfort

• Waistband and Liner Fit

• Pocket Functionality

• Moisture Control

• Style and Versatility

Why You Should Trust Us

Our testing team is composed of seasoned athletes who know the value of a solid pair of running shorts. In acknowledgment of the different needs runners of different types may have when shopping for running shorts, we enlist the knowledge and skills of reviewers from each gender to tackle individualized lineups composed of a full range of top-selling shorts.

Our lead tester for men's running shorts is Craig D'Innocente, a lifetime athlete and runner who grew up playing soccer throughout high school and college and carried running with him as a preferred extracurricular activity well into his post-graduate years. He currently travels to various parts of the country as a seasonal worker, most recently serving as a Botany Technician for the Willamette National Forest in Oregon, where forest trails proved fertile ground for running shorts testing. Craig aims to bring a scientific viewpoint to his gear testing, helping to create objective protocols to ensure his final product assessments are based as much on data points as on his individual experience in use.

The men's team also includes passionate runner and all-around mountain athlete, Matthew Richardson, who shares a similar background in both the sciences and in forestry, having both studied environmental biology and GIS (Geospatial Information Systems) and worked as a forestry technician in his earlier years. He now applies those refined data-driven skills to the world of computer mapping, working and playing out of Durango, Colorado. Matthew serves as one of GearLab's running experts across several categories, applying his expertise to running apparel assessments and taking a lead role on our men's trail running shoes review.

Our lead women's tester, Jackie Kearney, brings over a decade of experience in high-profile track running to her role as a lead reviewer on running shorts, having scored several NCAA All-American performances during a competitive college career. After logging many miles over many years, she now knows exactly what makes a well-functioning running short. Post-college, her path took her into the San Juan mountains of Colorado, where she soon transitioned into longer trail runs to support her growing passion for winter sports. Today, she remains an active runner to maintain fitness and prepare for a busy season of ski patrolling and ski touring once the snow arrives. Jackie lays down hundreds of running miles annually and has gone through countless pairs of women's running shorts over the years.

How to Select the Right Running Short for Your Needs?

A running short is so much more than a small pair of shorts intended for athletic use. There are many features that distinguish a high-performance running short from a broader athletic short, including a breathable and supportive liner and pockets built to prevent bouncing during runs. Before making a new purchase, it is important to consider liner type, inseam length, waistband width and type, material, and pocket utility.

Most shorts designed specifically for runners will also be divided along gender lines to accommodate various differences in body shapes and needs. Manufacturers commonly release similar models to both markets, although women's shorts tend to have shorter inseams and often come with fewer pockets. However, very often, the core components and important features are similar. There are numerous running short choices on the market, sold at many different price points and with unique performance distinctions. Although there are a set of key considerations worth evaluating no matter which direction you may choose to go, as with any clothing purchase, we recommend trying on each item before making a final decision to ensure a proper fit and style.

Men's Running Shorts

Our final scores in our men's running shorts review are drawn from the result of a variety of tests and in-use evaluations. The following chart illustrates the cumulative results of those findings for every pair we tested.

Women's Running Shorts

Our women's testing team puts a full lineup of women's models through the same rigorous testing regime, capturing the all-important female perspective to ensure our results reflect their specific needs. The chart below shows the final scores for all women's running shorts under current evaluation.

How Much Coverage Do You Want?

Although not always readily apparent to those who are not immersed in the sport, there are a wide variety of running short design choices out there, with different features meant to serve different needs. The cut of a running short is something that is not always immediately apparent but nevertheless plays a large role in comfort and performance. This includes inseam length, leg opening width, and the inclusion (or lack thereof) of a sidecut.

Probably the first thing most shoppers will notice is how long or short the legs of a pair of shorts hang on the body. Many newbies to the sport may be surprised at how short some inseams can be, potentially leaving a newer runner feeling a bit exposed. However, there are good reasons why these mini-lengths are so common. Shorter inseams are prevalent among designs meant for long-distance runs, given the unparalleled breathability and freedom of movement they provide. However, there is no question they fall short on coverage for those who prefer a bit less exposed skin and deliver a less impressive performance when moving in cooler temperatures, through inclement weather, or on rough trails in the backcountry. Longer inseams offer the inverse, with valuable coverage to protect the legs in rough terrain and better cold weather performance. For this reason, you are more likely to see the shorter styles on long-distance road runners and on race days than you are on a trail run or at the gym.

It is also important to note that inseams across the board are generally shorter on running shorts than everyday shorts for both genders, but these run even shorter on women's models. For example, mid-level performance shorts meant for women often sport inseams so short they are only seen on marathon designs for men. This level of exposure may not be for everyone. The good news is that many manufacturers now make the same models in different lengths. So, if you love the design in other ways but want a bit more coverage down the leg, you may well have several options to choose from.

Other important performance considerations when it comes to the cut of your shorts include leg opening width and crotch depth. Both of these measurements impact how you move in the shorts. Crotches that are cut too shallow and fit particularly close to the groin can feel restricting, while skinny leg openings can prove uncomfortable for those with larger thighs. Sidecuts are a particularly important design feature of a dedicated running short. When added, this cut enhances leg mobility by creating a wider leg opening to free your stride. These are commonly found on higher-performance shorts meant for runners who are comfortable sacrificing some coverage to maximize their range of motion. But it is important to note a large sidecut is going to be a little more revealing than even just a shorter inseam, exposing a bit more of the thigh each time the leg panels open and the cut expands. This may not be the right design style for everyone and should be evaluated based on your needs.

Which Design Features Are Important To You?

You will find most running-specific shorts come with some sort of liner (although unlined versions do sometimes also exist). A liner is an integral feature because it offers interior support around the groin (similar to what underwear might offer) as well as critical chafing protection for the thighs. But it's an added layer of fabric that sits between your body and the fabric of the shorts. So, breathability is key here, which is why many liners are designed with mesh fabric to ensure good airflow.

Seams on a liner are also very important as they are simultaneously the source of support, gripping your leg area to hold the liner in place, and a potential source of chafing if designed or executed poorly. Shorter brief-style liners will have seams that sit inside the crease at your groin, where they could become irritating to the skin if they begin rubbing and absorbing moisture. Longer liner designs lay between the legs, positioned where the thighs may touch and otherwise rub against each other. Here, the seams are meant to grip the thighs and hold the liner in place as the body moves. In both cases, extra care is often taken by manufacturers to produce rounded or flat seams that hold their places well without introducing any unintended risk of chafing. Strong, well-planned stitching can make a big difference in reinforcing the strength of the liner's grip and chafing control.

Several liner styles exist, with the most common being the brief liner. Longer short-style liners are another style frequently used, with legs that extend farther down to the mid-thigh. These liners are more common in women's shorts to accommodate for the increased risk of thigh chafe, as experienced by many female runners. You will also find compression shorts/tights designs on the market, both of which prevent chafing alone and can be combined with unlined shorts if that is your preference. Compression options have their pros and cons, with some runners loving the amplified support, coverage, and blood circulation. However, others see the increased heat accumulation and a more revealing fit as a reason to avoid them (or to at least combine them with another unlined pair up top). Shorts with liners provide a nice middle ground between tights and briefs, with a modest fit and solid chafing protection.

Waistbands are among the most important fitting mechanisms available on running shorts. They are usually combined with a drawstring to offer a wider range of fits, even if a perfectly fitting waistband could prevent the need for a drawstring closure altogether. Although not uncommon, shorts with an internally positioned drawstring can end up chafing on the waistline when tied and knotted during a run. For this reason, our testers generally prefer designs with drawstrings accessed from the exterior, as this helps to avoid uncomfortable situations when we need to tighten things up. It is rare to find a short without a drawstring, as this is among the easiest and sometimes necessary fit adjustment tools.

Waistbands also come in a plethora of widths and constructions, with recent designs showing a trend toward wider waistbands. A more average waistband measures around 1.25 inches, while our lineup had several pairs at 1.63 inches and even a few at 2 inches or more. These larger, yoga-style waistbands offer an incredibly snug fit that can be ideal for long runs. However, that fit does not come without its own cost. The extra material used to create these expanded waistbands can hold more heat in addition to absorbing sweat during exertion. This can create discomfort when tackling longer runs. Some waistband designs will integrate mesh into the wider cut waistbands to try and alleviate these drawbacks and take advantage of the best of both worlds.

What Will You Need to Carry?

Pockets are not always the first thing that springs to mind when thinking about purchasing running shorts, but they can prove to be a very necessary feature for some runners. On longer runs, storage becomes a necessity to carry things like nutrition, energy gels, and water. And, on most outdoor runs, people will likely want to have at least a few essentials on them, like keys, identification, and a phone. Of course, all storage needs could be met by a secondary piece of gear like a running vest, belt, or backpack. However, many of us appreciate the simplicity of a short that inherently comes with good storage, as it makes gearing up for a run that much simpler. Women's models tend to have less storage, following the same broader trends in women's fashion. For either gender, good pockets are going to be easily accessible and properly sized for their intended items. They will also restrain contents firmly, keeping them from moving or bouncing in stride.

There are many different styles of pockets incorporated into running shorts, including hip, rear, hand, and keyhole pockets. Each style is typically intended for a specific class of item and performs best when used accordingly. For example, rear pockets are often reserved for phones or larger items, protecting the contents with a zipper closure and placed against the tailbone to prevent movement during running. Hip pockets usually rely on elastic for security and are sized for nutrition, like bars and gels or key rings. Keyhole pockets are small openings where one can slide single keys and/or identification or credit cards, and they are usually hidden on the interior of the short. Finally, standard hip pockets are found on more versatile shorts and are usually capable of holding a large amount of items, but typically with lower security. When shopping, you will be best served if you consider what items you typically bring on a run and seek a short that can accommodate your storage needs based on its pocket lineup.

Why Does Fabric and Stitching Matter?

While most running shorts stick to some kind of synthetic fabric, there is a great deal of variety when you get into the specific composition of materials brought together to make the fabrics used in the shorts. Synthetics are typically chosen for active wear due to their lighter weights, wicking properties, sheer feel, and elasticity. Common fabrics include polyester, spandex/elastane, and nylon. Polyester typically makes up the lion's share of a fabric blend, with some shorts eschewing alternate fabric combinations altogether to go with full polyester knits instead. Each of these individual materials has its own properties, with its own unique combination of benefits.

Spandex is most commonly used for elastic applications, so fabrics that include this in their blend will offer more stretchiness, accepting less breathability as a tradeoff. Nylon is generally softer, smoother, lighter, and more durable than spandex and can be excellent at wicking away moisture, but it has less stretch than spandex comparatively. It tends to breathe a bit better but may not be as supportive or hold its form as well. Polyester fabrics can take many forms that will vary greatly, depending on how they are manufactured and what they are mixed with. But generally, it is a material known for wicking moisture easily and drying quickly, even if it may also lack breathability and hold odor.

Manufacturers invest a great of energy into engineering blended fabrics that will maximize all the best traits of these materials for athletic use. Be sure to take a closer look at the tags on any pairs you are considering, in addition to giving them a pull to feel the stretch and having a closer look at the liners and waistbands. It can be helpful to take note of the fabric compositions on some of your favorite athletic gear already at home to better understand your fabric preferences before adding anything more to your collection.

The construction and stitching on the body of your shorts will also have a large impact on the comfort and overall feel of the pair once worn. Construction here refers to not only the different fabric panels and component sections used to build the shorts but also to the ways in which each part is joined together. Stitching and seams can be a large source of chafing once you get moving, so it is common for manufacturers to utilize smooth or rounded stitches to ensure an easy-glide finish against the skin. It is also common to incorporate mesh in some capacity, whether that be full panels for the body or within the liner and/or surrounding the waistband. Shorts with mesh are excellent choices for runners who tend to overheat or just anyone running in a warmer climate.

How Hot Do You Run?

Environmental considerations (i.e., where will you be running?) and an individual runner's personal thermoregulation are also key factors in selecting the right shorts. Breathability is not something you may have at the front of your mind when you browse options, but it can become a major factor in how you feel once you take off for your first run in whatever pair you select. Sweat and heat can quickly become problematic if you are running in a hot climate or if you are someone who just tends to run hot, and if your apparel is not breathing well, this can turn from mildly uncomfortable to downright painful.

From overheating to chafing, if there is no airflow, you will feel the results. Manufacturers take different measures in the design process to try and mitigate such complaints. Mesh is a common strategy used to allow air and body heat to pass through the material of your shorts. It can take many forms and is used everywhere, from the waistband and liner to the body of the shorts themselves, utilizing varying sizes and techniques. Another way to increase breathability is to incorporate a brief liner rather than a longer version. The smaller-sized liner is meant to provide support using only a limited amount of additional material to reduce the potential for heat retention.

Manufacturers take a similar approach to combat moisture retention. While moisture wicking is a feature many runners greatly appreciate, it isn't everything a runner needs. A pair of saturated shorts can become quite weighty, soggy, and even sag if that same wicking material isn't equally designed to shed moisture at a fairly similar rate. The absorption can not only create an uncomfortable drag while running, but it can also present a big chafing problem. And all such issues will slow you down. Certain materials wick better than others, with spandex performing noticeably worse when it comes to moisture control than materials with a more heavily polyester base. Of course, there is some overlap with breathability in design that should be considered as well since a short that incorporates features to maintain solid airflow will also be better at removing moisture from the surface of the skin, regardless of the fabric. So, you'll want to consider both material combinations and design choices to assess if a product will be breezy, wicking, and cool enough to satisfy your needs and maintain comfort.

How Long Will They Last?

Durability and care are also important things to consider when purchasing and using running shorts. The thin fabric and lightweight construction of most running shorts mean they will not stand up to machine drying, and some may even suggest hand cleaning for washing and drying. Some shorts may even feature a durable water repellent, or DWR for short. This is a fabric treatment commonly used in wet weather gear like rain or ski jackets. Its purpose is to enhance the water-repellency of your garment. However, it does not last forever and may need reapplication over time to ensure continued performance. Make sure you read the care instructions for any pair of shorts you end up purchasing in order to prevent unwanted wear and tear. This is also among the reasons many runners will have several pairs of everyday shorts they use on average training runs and other more high-performance options they will add to their rotation for longer efforts and race days. It's worth considering the intended purpose before making a final selection among all the options.

Conclusion

Running is among the most core human activities and a sport beloved by many professional, amateur, and non-competitive everyday athletes alike. The right pair of shorts can turn any run into much more than a workout. We've compiled a wealth of information to help you assess the leading choices on the market, and all that's left is for you to decide which pair works best for you. Whether you are looking for a pair to get acquainted with the sport or for shorts to wear during your next marathon, there is sure to be something within our lineup you'll like. With that said, we hope your next pair of shorts proves a high-quality asset for all of your upcoming runs.