We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
Looking for a new trail running shoe? No matter if you're new to running, looking to explore new trails for the first time, or seeking to PR in your next wilderness ultra, the right pair of trail running shoes can transform your journey from a slog to a ride.
Since 2013, we've tested hundreds of unique models to bring you the most current and best offerings on the market today. Our team of experts runs trails year-round, from dreamy desert singletrack to muddy winter slogs. Back in the lab, we cut open every pair to see what's really going on inside and offer our insights and recommendations. Our in-depth analysis is informed by hundreds of hours of real-world testing over thousands of miles. Whether you like short lunch runs in nearby parks or adventures deep into the mountains, we can help you find the best pair of trail running shoes for your specific needs and budget.
Our overall favorite shoe for running any and all trails has been the Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 for a few years now. Despite all the other great pairs we've tested, the Ultras are exceptionally comfortable, highly protective, stable, and with good traction across a variety of surfaces. They're not even the most expensive option we've tested — and our whole testing team agrees they're worth the investment for serious trail runners.
For newer runners and those sticking to a more modest budget, we recommend the Brooks Divide 5. This line of shoes has proven itself to be stable and protective across moderate trails, and the version 5 is no exception. It's also available at a very reasonable price — and previous iterations (which we also recommend) can be purchased for even less.
Being fully equipped with the best running gear is key to having a great run, and the right shoes are just the beginning. We've put the top running shorts to the test to find which ones can actually go the distance. We've donned dozens of pairs of running socks in search of the best ones for any fit and feel preference. If you often find yourself running in subpar conditions, we've also found the best-performing running jackets for all conditions.
Editor's Note: This review was updated on May 3, 2025, to include the latest testing results of new models from La Sportiva, Brooks, Asics, Topo Athletic, Merrell, Saucony, Craft, and Hoka.
Comfortable, premium materials, carbon propulsion, unique color ways
Incredibly comfortable, good cushioning, high stability
High energy transfer, solid underfoot protection, comfortable upper, premium materials
Stable, durable, comfortable, good energy transfer
Good midsole, premium upper materials, secure fit
Cons
Expensive, lightweight design more likely to cause fatigue
Expensive, tight midfoot upper, longer break-in time
A bit short, expensive, may be too soft for some
Heavy, concerns about shortened midsole life
Expensive, hard to get on foot, must wear above the ankle height socks, hard to stuff laces into garage
Midfoot loose when descending steep terrain, thin laces
Rigid in technical terrain, less sensitive, narrow for some
Aggressive heel-to-toe drop, lack of stability
More fatiguing at long distances, low drop may not work for some
Clunky in technical terrain, poor traction in wet/loose conditions
Longer break in, stiffer underfoot, clunky in technical terrain
Less stable in technical terrain, heavy
Heel rigidity overbearing at times, narrow, harsh for extended runs
Heavy, substantial toe rocker, so-so grip
Stiff in technical terrain, some may find rigidity restrictive
Heavy rocker, less stable, expensive
Loose upper fit, heavy
Heavy, less agile than others, overly rigid for some
Heavy, lacks agility, clunky feeling at times
Dull midsole, heavy, expensive
Overly rigid in technical terrain, traction suffers in loose
Clunky in technical terrain, lacks sensitivity
Expensive, suffers in technical terrain, durability concerns
Heavy, clunky at times, lacks sensitivity
Expensive, terrain specific, poor traction, less stable
Stiff, overly rigid on technical trails, not versatile
Narrow, reduced room for foot swelling, pinches midfoot
Bottom Line
With exceptional materials and craftsmanship, this shoe provides excellent traction and performance — but its high price is harder to justify to less serious runners
For those that desire the lightest shoe in technical terrain, these are exceptionally comfortable and durable - perfect for racing or uptempo efforts
Top-tier performance with super shoe energy, a secure fit, and impressive technical prowess
An expert balance of technical prowess and responsiveness, plus ample comfort and a secure, natural-feeling fit, makes it a very versatile option
The finest shoe for technical terrain that gives a feeling of confidence at speed
Unmatched in technical terrain with an incredible midsole, we wish the fit was adjusted a bit to prevent slipping forward when descending
This iteration offers lightweight support, improved agility, and great comfort over moderate terrain, excelling in sub-50 mile runs
A legendary shoe that gets better by the year with minor tweaks to improve the performance of this specialty off-trail runner
Updates to the midsole and outsole enhance comfort and firm-up traction while keeping it light, agile, and ideal for longer, more variable runs
With exceptional energy return and long-run comfort on smoother surfaces, this maximal stack shoe has limited versatility and feels clunky on technical trails
Updated with a stiffer midsole, this remains the best model for heavy vert days, though it takes some breaking in
This iteration has increased cushion, stack, and drop, providing comfort and stability on variable easy trails, for an affordable price
This series has long been a favorite for its low stack, excellent stability, and serious attitude in technical terrain
Foot-shaped comfort with enhanced breathability and Vibram traction for long distances, but its pronounced toe rocker might not suit all preferences
This version offers increased comfort and support with a more rigid, planted feel — a departure from the lighter Catamount 3 that some may prefer
This carbon-plated model offers unmatched stability on technical terrain, with improved energy return, directional lugs, and a standout overall performance
Zero-drop comfort and durability shine in this shoe, featuring a roomy toe box and enhanced traction — but those doing aggressive running might find the fit less secure
This budget-friendly shoe has excellent traction, durability, and stability, making it ideal for long-distance runs on technical terrain
A shoe for tackling super technical terrain that's comfortable and will hold up
This stylish shoe, despite good fit and planted feel, isn't as responsive as the competition, making its high price hard to justify
This iteration offers excellent value, with improved comfort, durability, and support, making it ideal for varied surfaces
This trail runner provides ample cushioning while being very light, and more minimal traction makes it best for a combination of road and trail use
With a mediocre performance that makes it hard to justify their price, these are a comfortable carbon pair on moderate terrain
For long days on trail blending hiking and running, this is our go-to pick if you've been hesitant to try zero-drop models
If you're an experienced runner looking to PR these springy shoes are fast over easy to moderate terrain
Gravel road runners or those looking for fast times on smoother surfaces should check out this shoe
A stable base with good midsole comfort, but underwhelming traction that is best suited for narrow feet and moderate terrain
Great underfoot protection that holds up over time
V2 with Matryx mesh reduces weight
Excellent traction on all types of terrain
CONS
Very pricey
Must be worn with above-the-ankle height socks
Lace garage takes a bit of work
This second version of the S/Lab Ultra 3 (released in 2023) includes an updated upper containing Matryx fiber. This change is claimed to reduce the weight by 10%, and while our tests didn't show quite 10%, we still think this is the best trail running shoe on the market. The S/Lab Ultra 3 has long been a favorite for ultra-athletes who desire predictability and speed. While this is a minor update, we are thankful that Salomon is being particular about the changes and really only adjusting what is necessary.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
8 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
31 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
3.5 mm
Measured Weight
10.64 oz
Since the inception of the S/Lab Ultra lineup, Salomon has refined its ability to provide snug comfort. If we had to pick one pair of trail runners, this would be it. Some users may find the platform a bit harsh at times, but we think after easing in, you'll be pleased, especially if you find yourself on a technical trail. Some users may find this model overly aggressive for easier running and should opt for something a bit softer. But if you desire ultimate performance and comfort, then don't look further than the Ultra 3.
The Ultra 3 is a unisex shoe, and we've also reviewed it in our best women's trail running shoe review. It is important to note that our reviews are comparative, so the scores you see are determined based on how each shoe stacks up against everything else in the test suite. That said, both our testing teams love the Ultra 3 and have for many years.
If you are an experienced runner looking for precision and speed on technical trails, check out the Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3.
The Brooks Divide 5 is a trail shoe with excellent value, making it ideal for beginners — and those seeking a stable ride. With impressive durability and support for its 10.55 oz weight, the updated softer midsole enhances comfort. The model excels on easy-to-moderate trails and performs well on roads and gravel. While its subtle traction design isn't ideal for technical or loose terrain, it works well for those not pushing the limits of more challenging environments. For those looking for a solid, affordable option, the Divide 5 offers durability and comfort that's built to last for many miles.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
11 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
38 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
2.8 mm
Measured Weight
10.55 oz
More serious trail runners may find the Divide 5 lacking in traction when tackling technical terrain. Its rigid feel can sometimes be overbearing, and on steep or off-camber trails, it may not offer the necessary fluidity or precision. In these situations, a lighter shoe, like the (also on the affordable side) Saucony Peregrine 15, might be a better option. While the Divide 5 shines in stability and durability, for technical trail runs, it's best to consider alternatives that provide more flexibility and responsiveness.
It's no surprise that world-renowned mountaineer and trail runner Kilian Jornet would create an ultralight model as his first shoe after departing Salomon. The Nnormal Kjerag is the lightest trail shoe we've ever tested — by over an ounce per shoe! — and we are impressed with its comfort and performance. Nnormal has stripped back the excess, creating cushioning that follows today's trend without sacrificing the stiffness that is crucial for precision running. The midsole of the Kjerag transfers more energy than the competition, but this can also beat you up faster than plush designs. A leading concept at Nnormal is durability, and the craftsmanship is clear in this design. While it's expensive, we feel good knowing this shoe should last for a long time.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
8 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
25 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
3.0 mm
Measured Weight
8.05 oz
The Kjerag will be most appealing to advanced runners, and if you're tempted by these features, we think you'll love this shoe. That said, we wouldn't recommend this as your only trainer. As we mentioned, the firm cushioning can and will beat you up over time. This is especially noticeable when you are running with tired or dead legs. The Kjerag requires a lot of input and concentration to drive, so as soon as you relax, the shoe lacks traction and comfort. For those looking to tackle the most technical terrain, we'd opt for something more substantial, like the highly tractioned Salomon Speedcross 6. But for runners wanting to set a PR or simply feel fast, this is our favorite model.
Less stable in technical terrain, but best of the super shoes
Expensive
The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro excels as their top running shoe, blending technical support with super shoe performance. Its nitrogen-infused foam offers springy cushion, and the secure knit upper provides an excellent fit — though snug for high-volume feet. The comfortable midsole and effective 3.8 mm lugged outsole deliver versatile traction on various terrains, with sticky Frixion White XF 2.0 rubber enhancing grip. While stable on technical trails, the softer midsole and lack of carbon plate differentiate it from other super shoes. Lightweight at 9.79 ounces per shoe (men's US size 10.5), it offers great foot protection and a fast feel, making it a strong crossover option for varied long runs and races.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
5 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
29 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
3.8 mm
Measured Weight
9.79 oz
For those who are in the market for maximum forward momentum, a carbon plate will still edge out the Prodigio Pro in terms of energy return. However, what you gain in propulsion, you lose in technicality on rocky and steep terrain. The Prodigio Pro is our pick when runs explore many terrain surfaces — from roads to ridgelines — purely because it maintains its technical prowess while still offering exceptional energy return. If you're not quite convinced this model is fast enough for you, we'd consider the other carbon-plated options in our lineup, like the Hoka Tecton X 3 or Nike Ultrafly.
A wider platform under the heel increases stability when landing
A tapered profile makes these surprisingly agile
Great energy transfer with cushioning
CONS
Stiff over technical trails
Potential durability issues with the outsole
Less sensitivity on technical trails
We were excited to test the new updates to the Torrent 4, which we agreed was in a weird place in the Hoka lineup after changes to their other models. Increasing the stack and cushioning of the fourth version of the Torrent makes this model feel similar to an out-of-the-box Speedgoat 4 or 5. This latest iteration still retains its ultralight sensation of support and agility. In addition, the outsole got an overhaul and now features directional lugs that provide better traction in technical terrain. The upper is comfortable and breathable, allowing for friction-free long runs.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
5 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
31 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
4.3 mm
Measured Weight
9.40 oz
The lateral rigidity of the Torrent 4 is less ideal in technical terrain — we'd recommend this shoe for easy to moderate terrain at high speeds. It can be pushed harder thanks to its lower stack height, but many runners will prefer a slightly less stiff shoe in loose and off-camber situations. For this, we'd recommend the Hoka Speedgoat 6 or Nnormal Tomir 2.0. That said, over moderate trails, the Torrent 4 remains one of our favorite options for long-distance runs.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it is the mantra Salomon lives by regarding the legendary Speedcross line. The newest iteration, the Salomon Speedcross 6, includes minor design tweaks that improve upon the already great platform without reinventing the wheel. Long known for its aggressive outsole and unrivaled traction, designers modified the rubber compound to improve performance in muddy conditions. They fine-tuned the sagittate lug pattern for an even better grip on mud, rock, and everything in between. This new version is slightly lighter than the previous model, updating the upper to include more mesh for improved breathability. But don't worry, the Speedcross 6 still offers a glove-like fit straight out of the box. We're fast approaching a decade of running in this line of shoes, and our heart only grows fonder for this beloved trail runner.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
12 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
33 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
5.5 mm
Measured Weight
11.08 oz
Despite our gushing, we still have a few criticisms of this specialty shoe. Our biggest carry-over complaint between the previous version and the Speedcross 6 is the overly assertive and outdated drop design. With a thick heel counter and an exceptionally large heel-to-toe drop, this shoe is particularly unstable when running downhill. Although the breathability has improved by tweaking the type of mesh over the instep and forefoot, the Speedcross is better deployed during the cold weather months or high-altitude runs through the mountains. On the flip side, with other, less supportive, and less comfortable shoes pushing into its weight class, we no longer complain about the heft of the Speedcross 6. If weight is a big deal for you, the Nnormal Tomir 2.0 weighs slightly less and has traction nearly as incredibly as the Speedcross. At the end of the day, there is no better option for those who like to run off-trail, over snowy mountains, through muddy river bottoms, and up steep, rocky crags than the Speedcross 6.
Odds are, you know about the Hoka Speedgoat 6. It's an iconic modern trail shoe that changed the way we think about cushioning. For this iteration, Hoka ditched the out-of-box broken-in feel and opted for a harder, stiffer midsole. At first, we weren't fans, but after running in this shoe for a while, it relaxed, providing similar cushioning to the previous version without diving into the too-soft, gushy feeling that earlier iterations slid toward after a few hundred miles. The upper has also been reworked, opting for a thinner mesh, which helps reduce weight and increase drying speed. Increased durability is appreciated, as previous iterations often felt mushy after the first 100-200 miles.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
6 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
36 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
4.6 mm
Measured Weight
10.58 oz
While we think these changes were largely improvements, we do think loyal fans of the Speedgoat series will be disappointed by the out-of-the-box feel. We'd suggest not judging the model by the first 50 miles and being patient with the break-in period. This stiffness is also appreciated on technical terrain, and we found less deformation of the midsole on hard rocks. Stability has also improved, and micro adjustments of technical loose terrain are more confident in this updated iteration. We also loved the Nnormal Tomir 2.0 for its springiness and excellence on technical trails, though it has a bit too much room for our feet to slide forward on the downhill (though you may not experience this issue). All in all, the newly redesigned Speedgoat 6 is still an excellent choice for long ultras and big days in the mountains.
The Speedgoat 6 can do it all, from moderate trails to more technical mountain running. It makes a great versatile model and maintains comfort over long miles with high elevation change.
The Altra Lone Peak 9 delivers immediate comfort straight from the box and maintains its long-standing reputation as a favorite within the zero-drop community, renowned for its durability on challenging trails. Altra's latest iteration of the Lone Peak feels remarkably similar to version 7, featuring a durable ripstop upper, but introduces updates to the midsole and outsole compounds for increased comfort and improved confidence on technical terrain. Thru-hikers covering immense distances consistently rely on this model, highlighting its versatility as a potential do-it-all shoe. Its zero-drop platform ensures consistent cushioning across your entire foot, while the lower stack height contributes to enhanced stability.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
0 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height
25 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
4.0 mm
Measured Weight
11.29 oz
The slightly less snug upper can allow for some movement during fast, aggressive running on uneven trails. On the other hand, if your feet often swell while you run, this characteristic is actually beneficial and enhances the breathability and overall comfort of the Lone Peak 9. Its wide toe box promotes natural toe splay, reducing fatigue, and its aggressive lugs provide reliable traction. While zero-drop isn't for everyone, those with the necessary strength and flexibility will find it an excellent option for blending comfort and sensitivity in technical environments. For runners preferring a low stack but needing some heel-toe drop, the Hoka Mafate Speed 4 is a noteworthy alternative.
The Lone Peak 9 remains our go-to for zero-drop technical performance.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Compare Products
Our lead tester, Matthew, runs thousands of mile a year, testing shoes on trails in Southwest Colorado.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
How We Tested
Trail running shoe testing never ends, as companies release new models throughout the calendar year. We continue our tests in all seasons, all over the country, and often have the opportunity to compare the most current models against previous versions of the same shoe. Although our testers don't always log their distances with a GPS watch, they know they have collectively run thousands of miles while testing over 140 different pairs of trail running shoes in the past decade. Our testing process combines thorough research, detailed scrutiny at our testing facility in Lake Tahoe, industry knowledge, and many hours spent out on the trail. Testing these shoes side-by-side gives us well-informed data anchored in real-world experience, and we've used that knowledge to put together this review to help you find your perfect trail sidekicks.
Stack Height Measurement Variability
You might notice that our reported stack height measurements often differ from what the various manufacturers claim. This is due to the fact that there is no industry standard for these kinds of specs. Because of that, companies can report anything, and there's no way to know where on the shoe they measured or if they included insoles or lugs in their measurements.
To have data that's actually comparable across all our tested shoes, we split every shoe we test in half on a band saw and measured in the exact same place on each one. Our method for this is based on the requirements set by World Athletics, the governing body for running competitions.
Following their requirements, we start by measuring the internal length of the shoe before wearing it. The heel is designated as 12% of this length, and the forefoot is 75%. From there, we measure the height of the entire sole, anything between where your foot would be and the ground. This includes the tread, all the cushioning, and the insole.
Looking at a cross section of each shoe reveals a lot about why and how they may perform differently out on the trail.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Our in-depth testing process of trail running shoes is spread across six rating metrics:
Comfort and Fit (25% weighting)
Traction (20% weighting)
Stability (15% weighting)
Foot Protection (15% weighting)
Weight (15% weighting)
Sensitivity (10% weighting)
Each shoe goes through a rigorous data collection process in our testing facility in addition to all the miles our runners log outside.
Credit: Abriah Wofford
Why Trust GearLab
Over the years, we've had a pretty epic group of athletes test these trail running shoes. Currently leading that charge is Matthew Richardson, a resident of southwest Colorado who has years of experience moving through the mountains. Progressing through the region's wide range of activities, running remains his biggest passion. Some of his achievements include a day trip to the Chicago Basin 14ers and a top-ten finish at the Telluride Mountain Run, which had over 14k of vertical in 38 miles. A lover of maps, Matthew enjoys creating and exploring new routes and is always in search of the next great loop.
Chiming in from the Sierra foothills of Nevada is longtime reviewer Matt Bento, a lifelong runner since high school. Matt discovered his enthusiasm for trail running one summer while working in Yosemite Valley when temperatures hovered in the 90s, and he decided it was too hot to go climbing. He methodically logged miles and built up his endurance until he could run the Yosemite high camps loop, a 40-mile adventure through the Sierra high country. Ever since he's found many ridge runs and link-ups throughout the Sierra and believes the best runs start in the dark and end with a cheeseburger.
Adding his expert opinion to this already stacked lineup of reviewers is Aaron Rice. A New Englander whose heart was called to the mountains instead of the sea, Aaron has lived (and run) up and down the Rocky Mountains for more than 15 years — from the Flatirons of Boulder, CO, to the Tetons outside of Jackson, WY, and now in the high desert of Santa Fe, NM. As a professional ski patroller and avalanche educator, his favorite time is spent in the high alpine.
From short speed days to long explorations in the mountains, the shoes in our review have been through it all.
A dependable shoe for beginners and casual trail runners, that won't break the bank.
Hot and dry climates require a shoe that can breathe well and handle loose gravel and sand.
We put every pair of shoes through rigorous, comparative testing, determined to find what they each do best.
Analysis and Test Results
During our discussion of testing metrics and shoe performance, please keep in mind that all ratings and comparisons are made in relation to the other tested products. We carefully select and purchase only the most highly rated products, so the competition is fierce. A shoe with a low score can still be a great option, depending on your personal needs and budget. Within our in-depth reviews, we break down each metric individually so that you can more easily tune into the pros and cons of each specific trail running shoe. If you are new to trail running and unsure of what you should look for in a shoe, it is always good to take a moment to consider your foot shape, running style, and any athletic goals you may have.
Worse Value
Better Value
What's the Best Value?
A significant consideration when selecting a pair of trail running shoes is the value of the purchase. While one could simply assume that you get what you pay for, years of testing have proven that this isn't always true. When considering the value of a trail running shoe, three aspects are essential: price, performance, and longevity (i.e., durability).
The Brooks Divide 5 excels at providing great stability in an affordable model.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Two of these, price and performance, are easily quantifiable and can be compared directly. The Brooks Divide 5 is a particularly valuable option, as it scores nearly as high as some of the top competitors in key metrics yet costs significantly less. If you don't need quite as much stability as the Divide, the Merrell Nova 4 is an equally good option for all-around value and versatility.
The Merrell Nova 4 offers versatile plush comfort for an affordable price.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
While these particular shoes may not appeal to seasoned trail runners, they are a fantastic entry-level option for those interested in trying out trail running for the first time. If you're looking for some serious performance but don't want to break the bank, check out the Saucony Peregrine 15, which blend excellent comfort, durability, and responsiveness at a pretty reasonable price tag. This is our top recommendation for those who want a light, snappy shoe that excels at distances between 10-30 miles.
The Saucony Peregrine 15 is an excellent option for those who prioritize value and comfort.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
The third aspect of value for a trail running shoe, longevity, is not nearly as easy to quantify. Since all shoes eventually wear out and need to be replaced, finding those that can withstand more miles of abuse before disintegrating helps determine that shoe's value. Unfortunately, every runner puts a different amount of strain on their shoes, so their lifetime varies widely. We certainly put each batch of test shoes through the wringer, and durability issues often present themselves early on. We have been particularly impressed with the durable craftsmanship of the Nnormal Kjerag — though they don't come cheap.
Despite being mind-blowingly lightweight, the Kjerag also appears to be impressively durable. Which is good, because it's expensive.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a challenging criterion to rate because it is so subjective. Everyone's foot is different, and a shoe that feels amazing to one person could be unwearable by another. Some products are wide in the toe box while narrow in the heel, and some are just really narrow (or wide) throughout. Some fit perfectly “to size,” while others run slightly long or short. We offer our take on each pair's size relative to the “average” fit of a trail running shoe.
Try Before You Buy
Comfort is probably the single most important criterion when it comes to selecting a running shoe, or any footwear for that matter, and we recommend you take time to find the right fit above all other factors when selecting a pair of shoes.
To assess each shoe, we run dozens of miles in every pair. We consider underfoot cushioning and responsiveness, we scrutinize tongue comfort and lace feel, and we examine heel collars and all-around foot feel. Craftsmanship plays a prominent role in comfort, as poorly sewn seams or mismatched material overlap can cause rubbing spots. We evaluate each how each shoe compares in length and width to the “average fit” of any given running shoe of that size.
Though comfort is ultimately subjective, our tests pitted each shoe side by side, and our recommendations and scores are based on the performance of each shoe relative to the “hypothetical average shoe” to help you get a better idea of what will fit your feet.
We compile our experiences on long runs over a variety of terrain types. We run through streams and rivers to gauge how much water each pair absorbs and how quickly it can shed that water afterward. We cover rolling trails, steep ups and downs, and loose talus — all of which demand different things from the fit of your shoes.
The Brooks Catamount 4 excels at providing stability and comfort in a lightweight package.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
It is no surprise that the shoes with the plushest padding often feel the most comfortable right out of the box. The Salomon Speedcross 6 and Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 are some of the most comfortable models, particularly for those who often run in rugged, mountainous terrain. The Brooks Divide 5 is plush and padded, and the Brooks Catamount 4 is so comfy we found ourselves wearing them for all sorts of non-running activities.
The Ultraventure 4 is comfortable for trail runs and all-day hikes.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Nike Ultrafly is sold as a race shoe, but the plush comfort on these thickly padded carbon-fiber-plated shoes is better suited to an ultra race pace rather than a quick 5 or 10K. For users wanting maximum comfort while blending running and hiking, we'd recommend the Topo Ultraventure 4 and Nike Wildhorse 8. Many other shoes featured in this review are also exceedingly comfortable, but these two are more easily molded to different shapes of feet than most.
The Nike Wildhorse 8 is exceptionally comfortable and offers great protection, but has a high stack that makes it feel less stable on hills.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
For this round of testing, the Hoka Mafate Speed 4 received very high marks for its comfort and overall performance. These traits make it one of our highest recommended models, and it's great for speed in a variety of terrain types. The cushioning is plush but still feels lively and agile.
The Hoka Mafate Speed 4 is a do it all model you should heavily consider as its comfortable blend of cushion and energy return is one of the most versatile in our lineup.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Another top-scoring model was the Norda 002, which has the best blend of all our test metrics. Its standout attribute, though, is its comfort. The fit of the upper and advanced materials makes it exceptionally comfortable without sacrificing performance and security in technical terrain. The midsole Norda x Vibram SLE compound is responsive without the harshness found in other stiff midsoles. Vibram did an excellent job with this exclusive midsole, and it's our favorite in the lineup. While expensive, it's worth noting that we think the Norda 002 could be a great “quiver of one” for those who like to keep their gear to a minimum, while still wanting top-tier performance.
The Norda 002 is a very expensive shoe, but it is also one of the best-fitting, most comfortable, and best-tractioned models we've tested.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro impressed us with its knit upper fit. Generally, we find knit uppers to be a miss, often leaving loose fabric that is better tackled by a standard tongue design. That's not the case with the Prodigio Pro — its fit is excellent and provides some of the best comfort without sacrificing security. Those with high-volume feet may find the knit upper too snug for their liking, but we found the fit to be just right. If you're looking for a super shoe that excels in technical terrain, definitely check out this model.
The Prodigio Pro excels at providing stable energy return in technical and loose situations.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Traction
If it weren't for the drastically increased performance regarding traction, there would not be much incentive to purchase trail shoes over a pair of running shoes for pavement. Based on this assessment, one can understand the argument that traction is one of the most important aspects of a trail running shoe.
This total metric score includes input from each shoe's traction performance across a wide range of surfaces, with preference for the more typical dry hardpack trails most runners traverse.
Three main factors contribute to a shoe's ability to grip a variety of surfaces well: the type of lugs, the shape and spacing of the lugs, and the properties of the rubber used. Deeper, more aggressive lugs grip most surfaces better, especially steep dirt, grass, mud, and snow. More and more trail running shoes reflect this, with lugs becoming increasingly more aggressive across the board. It's worth noting that all of the shoes we test offer pretty solid traction — especially on your standard, dry, hardpacked, dirt trail.
Traction Ratings Across Various Surfaces
Product
Loose Trail
Mud
Slick Rock
Nnormal Tomir 2.0
5
5
5
Salomon Speedcross 6
5
5
5
Norda 002
4
4
5
La Sportiva Wildcat
5
4
4
Hoka Mafate Speed 4
4
4
4
Hoka Speedgoat 6
4
3
4
La Sportiva Bushido III
4
3
4
Altra Lone Peak 9
4
4
3
Nike Wildhorse 8
4
3
3
Craft Pure Trail
3
3
3
Saucony Peregrine 15
3
3
3
Merrell Nova 4
3
3
3
Topo Ultraventure 4
3
3
3
La Sportiva Prodigio Pro
3
3
3
Hoka Tecton X 3
3
3
3
Brooks Cascadia 18
3
3
3
Hoka Torrent 4
3
3
3
Nnormal Kjerag
3
2
3
Salomon Sense Ride 5
3
2
3
Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3
3
2
3
Nike Ultrafly
3
2
3
Salomon Ultra Glide 2
2
2
3
Brooks Divide 5
2
2
3
Hoka Challenger 7
2
2
2
Brooks Catamount 4
2
2
2
Asics Trabuco Max 4
2
1
1
Adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra
1
1
1
Pulling out just the “crud” terrain paints a different picture of shoe performance. If you frequently run through the muck, high-scoring models in this chart might be a better fit for your routes.
Lugs that are close together tend to do a better job of gripping well on rock and hard dirt surfaces, while lugs that are further apart usually shed mud faster. Deeper lugs can increase hold — depending on their shape, distance between, and substrate you're running on. The deepest lugs in our lineup are the Salomon Speedcross 6 (5.5 mm), the Nnormal Tomir 2.0 (5.0 mm), the Saucony Peregrine 15 (5.1 mm), Hoka Mafate Speed 4 (5.2 mm) and the La Sportiva Wildcat (4.8 mm).
The Mafate Speed 4 have aggressive, deep, multidirectional lugs, giving these shoes some of the best traction of any we've tested.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
The Salomon Speedcross 6 offers the best all-around traction we've found. It's an ideal shoe for just about every trail and mountain condition. It's one of the few shoes that tackled sloppy shoulder season snow with ease. Mud, slippery roots, and wet rocks couldn't stop these impressively grippy shoes. And, with a well-designed lug pattern, the Speedcross also holds its own on loose, dry trails, to boot.
The Speedcross 6 is a powerhouse of traction, keeping us steady on our feet through fields of sticky mud, across lingering patches of snow, and on freshly rained-on rocks.
Credit: Jill Rice
Another pair we found ourselves reaching for when the going got tough is the Nnormal Tomir 2.0. This shoe offers a truly amazing blend of speed, comfort, and traction. Both the Tomir 2.0 and the Nnormal Kjerag provide exceptional traction for their intended uses, and we enjoy running on the grippy, lightweight Vibram LiteBase outsoles (which are also found on other shoes in our lineup).
Best for mountain running and technical terrain the Tomir 2.0 is a great addition to our shoe rotation and we continue to love running in these each time we put them on.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Our only complaint about the Tomir 2.0 is that we often shifted forward in the shoe when tackling steep downhills at speed. You can read more about this in the comfort section of the Tomir's review. The Norda 002 also uses a similar blend that was developed in conjunction with Vibram, which aids in providing excellent traction. These three pairs also contain our favorite midsoles, which create outstanding combinations of energy transfer, stability, and sensitivity.
The Norda 002 proprietary Vibram-blend outsole with 4.8 mm deep lugs combine for some of the best traction we've experienced to date.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Stability
Trail running takes place over uneven ground, and being able to land and push off from a platform that is stable both longitudinally and laterally is a critical feature of how well a shoe performs. Failure to maintain stability through the running stride will lead to either losing traction and slipping or, even worse, rolling an ankle and causing an injury. Through extensive testing over many years, we have found that stability is impacted mainly by the following four factors: stack height, heel-toe drop, landing platform, and the width/fit of the upper.
Stability in a pair of shoes starts with your stride and foot placement, combines with your trail conditions, and includes the physical characteristics of each shoe. It's those characteristics that we test to see which are better suited to the task of keeping you stable in trying conditions.
The stack height represents how much material rests between the ground and your foot. In most cases, the larger the stack height, the greater the chance for a rolled ankle — although this threat can be mitigated by having a broader landing platform, as determined by the shape of the bottom of the shoe. A wider platform typically ensures better stability, while a narrower platform is less stable. Heel-toe drop measures the difference in stack height between the heel and the toes. The upper is the third basic component of a shoe, aside from the outsole and midsole, and is what we look at as the “body” of a shoe. A shoe with an upper that firmly holds your foot allows you to land squarely on top of the footbed, minimizing movement within the shoe.
The Hoka Tecton X 3 has a very high stack height. However, its carbon fiber plate has “wings” that extend up the sides of the shoe, offering added lateral stability on slanted trails.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Over the last many years, shoe companies, mainly in response to customer demand, have been slowly lowering the average heel-toe drop, which today rests around 6-9 mm. Shoes with a substantial drop, like the Salomon Speedcross 6, can be less stable on uneven off-camber terrain, particularly when combined with narrower outsoles or a loose fit. Shoes with little to no drop, like the Lone Peak 9 or Hoka Mafate Speed 4, are often more stable, especially when they have wide landing platforms and a secure fit.
The wide platform of the Lone Peak 9 is supportive and stable and works well for both trail running and hiking.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Another critical factor for stability is the firmness of the midsole. Very stiff shoes tend to be more stable than soft and pliable ones. A flexible shoe that can easily bend in any direction allows your foot to take the shape of what it lands upon, but this is not generally the most stable design. We have accustomed ourselves to walking on flat surfaces, and a shoe that provides this feels more stable, especially if you are stepping on a very uneven surface like rocks and roots. The platform of the versatile La Sportiva Bushido III ticks all of these boxes. With a low heel stack height, a rigid midsole, and a specialized heel cup, this shoe creates a strong connection between all our leg joints, resulting in one of the most stable performances we've found. The Brooks Divide 5 also features a rigid platform that makes it a great stable shoe for runners just getting into their sport.
The Bushido III has an excellent combination of secure fit, rigid midsole, and low stack height, resulting in an impressively stable ride.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Thanks to a wide platform and stiff midsole design, the Brooks Cascadia 18 (5.6-inch-wide forefoot, 34 mm heel stack) and Brooks Divide 5 (4.7 inches, 38 mm) are some of the most stable shoes for consistent terrain — one of the reasons why they have remained fan-favorites among runners for so many years. The Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 (4.3 inches, 31 mm), Norda 002 (4.6 inches, 29 mm), and Nnormal Kjerag (4.4 inches, 25 mm) scored similarly well in our head-to-head stability testing. The La Sportiva Wildcat combines dense cushioning with a large heel that makes for an impressively stable platform, even while carrying a hydration pack full of supplies for your day.
The La Sportiva Wildcat does an exceptional job providing great stability on many types of terrain.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Foot Protection
Trail running is a demanding sport, both on your feet and shoes. We've determined that the most important criterion for evaluating a trail running shoe is how well it protects your foot. The soles of the feet are among the most sensitive areas of your body, so if you intend to traverse rocky and uneven terrain, then your shoe will need adequate underfoot protection.
We consider a variety of protective features and perform a ton of intensive tests to arrive at these final scores for each shoe's overall foot protection.
While almost all modern running shoes have an outsole and midsole, underfoot protection typically comes in one of two forms: a rock plate made of a plastic or composite material that adds rigidity to the shoe and absorbs impacts, or thick foam cushioning (a few trail runners now have carbon fiber plates that can also add propulsion). The most common type of foam used is EVA, which protects the foot from protrusions and absorbs a significant amount of the impact inherent to running before it travels upward into the body.
Ample underfoot foam (like the ultrathick 41 mm heel stack of the Trabuco Max 4, pictured here) provide great underfoot protection.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Advancements in carbon fiber technology have allowed shoes like the Hoka Tecton X 3 and Nike Ultrafly to incorporate this material into their midsoles, offering a new level of underfoot protection and power output. Perhaps unsurprisingly, foot protection often comes at the expense of sensitivity, and vice versa, which is why we grade for both.
The Nike Ultrafly is one of very few trail shoes currently incorporating a carbon fiber plate into the midsole, adding both propulsion on certain types of trails and additional underfoot protection over rocky ground.
Credit: Natalie Kafader
A lesser component of foot protection is how well the upper protects the top and sides of your feet from protrusions like sticks or abrasion by rocks. The ends of the toes are a common point of abuse, as we have all accidentally kicked a rock while bombing down a trail. Rigid toe bumpers go a long way in helping to alleviate this pain, and the Brooks Cascadia 18 offers some of the best toe box protection available. Many manufacturers skimp on upper materials to save weight and offer more breathability and water drainage, while some have uppers as mighty as a bulletproof vest. But if you end up with a beloved shoe whose one downfall is a more delicate upper, you can always wear gaiters to supplement.
The Brooks Cascadia 18 has a beefy toe box, providing serious protection.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
A handful of shoes offer superior foot protection compared to the rest of the field. The Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 does a great job of protecting the undersides of the feet with its PU foam and utilizes a lightweight, breathable, and impressively durable upper. Hoka shoes are known for their thick underfoot stacks, with midsole foam that is dense and highly absorbent. While shoes like the Hoka Tecton X 3 and the Hoka Challenger 7 have high stack heights, the slightly more stripped-down Hoka Torrent 4 still provides superb underfoot protection.
The high stack height of the Tecton X, and other similarly stacked Hoka shoes, offes underfoot protection using thick foam.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
All the models from La Sportiva we've tested offer great foot protection. The Prodigio Pro, the Bushido III, and the Wildcat all provide tank-like protection with padded tongues, toe bumpers, and rock plates that make them perfect options for demanding runs in the mountains. For gravel road runners looking for maximum energy transfer with their protection over long days, first we'd recommend the Asics Trabuco Max 4, second the Salomon Sense Ride 5.
The Salomon Sense Ride 5 offers great protection and stability, and it has a solid upper that secures the foot.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Weight
We love to consider, measure, and compare shoe weight because all of life is a battle against gravity — the less weight burdening you, the freer you are to move around and push the limits of your sport. When running, you repeatedly pick your feet up to move them forward, so the weight on your feet does matter. However, trail running shoes throw a wrench in this equation when you consider that the features added onto a shoe to improve performance may also contribute to a higher weight.
These weights are per shoe, measured in US men's size 10.5.
For instance, thicker and burlier midsoles with rock plates are heavier, but they protect the feet more. Cut out too much of this protection, and you will surely end up with a super-light shoe, but you will also have to moderate your speed significantly to avoid damaging your feet. The takeaway is that lighter is better, but only if it doesn't compromise functionality. The shoes described here naturally fall within a spectrum when considering these two factors, and which end of the spectrum you fall on is entirely a personal choice.
The Nnormal Kjerag are fantastic, exceptionally lightweight shoes for technical terrain and inclines.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Nnormal Kjerag, weighing in at only 8.05 ounces for a men's size 10.5 US, is the lightest shoe in our review by well over an ounce per shoe. Despite this featherlight weight, it still manages to feel durable and substantial, and is great for race and uptempo training days. The Hoka Challenger 7 impresses us with its substantial cushioning and one of the lightest weights we tested, at just 9.47 ounces per shoe. It's a great option for lightweight running from dirt roads to two-track.
We are impressed with the lightweight design of the Challenger 7 even with packing in so much cushioning.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
With an upgraded, lightened design, the Hoka Torrent 4 (9.40 ounces) is one of our favorites for long distances, where its low weight helps stave off fatigue. For the super shoes, the clear standout is the La Sportiva Prodigio Pro, weighing 9.79 oz. This has an excellent feel on a variety of terrain and can feel as impressive as rock hopping or opening it up on paved roads.
The Torrent 4 is a lightweight shoe that is still very comfortable and well-cushioned underfoot, making it our go-to for long distance days.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Sensitivity
We define sensitivity by how easy it is to get feedback from the trail beneath your feet as you run. Both drop and stack play an important role in sensitivity. Trail running shoes are designed to protect your feet from abrasion, direct blows from the pointy sides of rocks, or repeated impacts on your body inherent in the motion of running itself. However, they also need to balance this protection with the foot-to-brain feedback — known as proprioception — that is necessary to run effectively.
Before humans started wearing shoes, the feet provided a critical link with the world via their sense of touch. Many modern runners have found that they are better runners when the sensitive link between their feet and the ground is maintained. If this connection is more important to you than protection, you may enjoy a barefoot shoe — just be sure to do the research into how to make this transition in a healthy and safe way.
The shoes that allow for more accurate feedback are easier to run in, as they make it easier to run naturally without having to consciously consider every step. This, in turn, not only makes for a more pleasant run but also helps you to avoid tripping and falling.
Higher sensitivity scores are important for those running over changing terrain, where feeling the specific bumps and dips of your route is crucial for getting across them.
Altra's Lone Peak 9 — with a low underfoot stack height of 25 mm and a 0 mm heel-toe drop — pulls in key performance elements from barefoot shoes. They maintain a low- or zero-drop profile, a wide toe box for natural toe splay, and a lightweight design without sacrificing the type of underfoot protection and cushioning we expect from a trail runner.
The Altra Lone Peak has a very low stack height and a wide toe box that combine to give you great underfoot sensitivity.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Burlier mountain runners, like the La Sportiva Bushido III (22 mm forefoot stack, 8 mm drop), don't sacrifice support or grip for the sake of sensitivity. But their moderate stack height keeps your foot closer to the ground, increasing that necessary sense of connection. Several other lightweight options, such as the Norda 002 (22 mm forefoot, 7 mm drop), Nnormal Kjerag (17 mm forefoot, 8 mm drop), and Saucony Peregrine 15 (27 mm forefoot, 4 mm drop), offer a lower stack height and increased flexibility to improve ground feel and your overall sense of movement.
The low stack measured on the Peregrine 15 helps it to be sensitive and lively across varied trail surfaces.
Credit: Matthew Richardson
Conclusion
Running on trails is an excellent way to stay fit and healthy and has just as many benefits for the mind as it does for the body. We love it for the incredible variety, the connection to nature, and most of all, we love the potential for adventure. There are many different styles and types of trail running shoes, many of which are designed for specific purposes. We hope this article has helped you with your decision-making process and that you end up with a pair of shoes that you are happy with and can be a partner on the memorable adventures to come. Happy trails!
