We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
For moving light and fast, hiking shoes can be a better choice than hiking boots, and provide better protection than trail running shoes, but choosing the ones to suit your needs isn't always easy. We can help.
The On Cloudrock Low Waterproof is our favorite all-around men's hiking shoe. The cushy comfort keeps our feet feeling fresh mile after mile, while the waterproofing keeps them dry on dewy morning hikes and shallow stream crossings.
The Columbia Crestwood is a budget-friendly hiking shoe that performs well on trails and can take you off the beaten path. It is ready to go right out of the box and excels in warm, arid climates. These hikers are a go-to for those new to hiking, and their lightweight build feels much like a tennis shoe.
Hiking is our jam. We've trail-tested the best hiking shoes since 2012, and in this update, we compare the 17 best men's models available today. Our experts covered hundreds of miles in these shoes, from dry, high alpine hikes to wet, muddy, rock-strewn paths. Day hikes and multi-day adventures informed us on key performance areas like traction, all-day comfort, and support to bring you relevant and helpful comparisons.
While most shoes come in women's and men's versions, they don't always perform the same. To address this, we also conduct in-depth testing of women's hiking shoes. Additionally, we have extensive reviews of hiking gear and backpacking gear to help you get ready for all manner of adventure.
Editor's Note: We updated this review on May 6, 2026, to include new shoes from Hoka and Topo Athletic.
The On Cloudrock Low Waterproof is the best hiking shoe for cruising most dirt trails while also excelling on urban gravel and paved paths. “I can't get over how cushy these shoes feel on concrete,” Chris says. “Of course, they're great on hard terrain, but the Helion superfoam midsole — with those cool pass-through holes — is so good at softening impacts that I find myself choosing these shoes any time I need to run errands around town. Crazy comfort here.” The lightweight build features a remarkably burly upper made from 100% recycled polyester. The TPU toe cap protected our toes when we accidentally kicked a rock or stick on rough ground, and the full perimeter mud guard helped protect the upper when striding off-trail.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
2.36 lbs
Upper
Recycled polyester, TPU
Lining
Waterproof membrane
Flood Height
3.87 in (size 14)
Last Board/Shank
X-shaped Speedboard
The waterproof membrane inside the Cloudrock Low kept our feet dry while treading through dewy grass and impromptu stream crossings, but the relatively thick upper results in a shoe that ran a bit warm on the hottest summer days. “The waterproof membrane is breathable, but after a couple of hours hiking in the summer, my feet usually got hotter than I like,” Chris reported. If hot-weather hiking comfort is more important to you than sloshing through puddles and wet forests, the Merrell Moab 3 kept one of our testers' feet cool while hiking in temperatures around 90° Fahrenheit. If you want to be able to step through shallow mountain streams without getting your feet wet, the waterproof Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex runs a bit cooler in hot weather — though it's not as cushy underfoot as the Cloudrock.
The Columbia Crestwood initially caught our eye for its low price point, but really “wowed” us when we put them on and took them for a stroll. They use a Techlite midsole that is reasonably supportive but is not overly stiff. Our feet felt comfortable as we trekked on uneven terrain. Weighing 1.83 pounds for a size 11, they are among the lightest in our lineup. These shoes use a suede leather and mesh upper that is pliable and breathes well in arid climates. We enjoyed wearing these on day hikes on our local trail system, but we also took them into moderate off-trail terrain and found them to do surprisingly well for a budget shoe. These shoes feel more like tennis shoes, and we had very little break-in. Our tester, Ryan Huetter, mentions, “Fitting much like a well-loved pair of sneakers, I found these easy and enjoyable to walk in.”
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
1.83 lbs (size 11)
Upper
Suede leather, mesh, webbing
Lining
None
Flood Height
1.5 in
Last Board/Shank
Not specified
The Crestwood is not as supportive as many other shoes in this review, like the Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex that features a stiffer midsole construction. This lighter construction will limit the Crestwood's usefulness in really demanding terrain. They are also not waterproof, and their flood height is only one inch, so those seeking a shoe that will keep their feet dry in wet climates may look to another shoe such as the Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof. However, if you live in a warm and dry climate, you likely won't need a waterproof shoe. For those looking for an entry-level shoe that won't break the bank and offers good performance in mild and moderate hiking terrain, we enjoy the Crestwood and recommend it for its bargain price.
The Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex hiking shoe is built to chew up even the roughest trails. This latest update is still made for rugged terrain, but its simplicity makes it a winner for casual day hikes as well. Built on an AVD-C Chassis, the lateral support offered by these low-top hikers is top-tier, and the new Kevlar fiber-infused Matryx upper feels flexible yet supportive right out of the box. We marveled at how confident the footbed makes us feel whenever we venture off-trail, and the waterproof Gore-Tex liner breathes fairly well, keeping our feet cool on warm spring days. Our size 14 test pair weighed in at just 2.1 lbs, which is very lightweight in comparison. Our tester, Chris, says, “When I'm cruising on a trail or exploring through the woods, I can't believe how confident I feel each time I step in these X Ultra 5s. The side-to-side stability is so good, I feel like I can spend more time looking at the scenery than down at the ground, planning each step.”
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
2.1 lbs
Upper
Synthetic with Matryx Kevlar weave
Lining
Gore-Tex membrane
Flood Height
3.86 in (size 14)
Last Board/Shank
ADV-C chassis
While the X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex Quicklace system makes tightening these shoes fast and easy, you have to tuck the laces into a little pocket over the tongue to avoid a tripping hazard. It takes just as long as tying shoes with traditional laces, but you do end up with a trim ride so your laces are unlikely to catch on sticks or brush. The previous version had a tall rear heel tab that bothered the Achilles area on some, but Salomon shortened it in the Ultra 5, making it much more comfortable. Sizing is a tad short and a bit narrow, which ensures a stable fit and outstanding technical performance, but the snug fit is something you might want to consider if you prefer a roomy feel. The Oboz Sawtooth X Low Waterproof is another shoe worth considering for its performance in rugged terrain, though not nearly as light as the Ultra 5.
The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX continues to be one of the most comfortable hikers we've tested. They stand out for their cushy comfort, solid support, abrasion-resistant uppers, and waterproof liner. The uppers are soft and pliable thanks to the high-quality mesh, but they gain extra durability with the nubuck leather, too. They are built on a responsive sugarcane EVA midsole that absorbs impacts on the trail. Additionally, they easily conform to the foot with time and do not require much of a break-in period. As we knock out the miles, we like the support provided by the cushiony midsole and slight rocker that makes striding smoother. One tester, Ryan Huetter, explained, “My foot sits low in the shoe, making them feel stable, while the wide outsole resists rolling.” The stability and durability provided by these shoes add a couple of ounces in weight, but that is a sacrifice we are willing to make for a well-built shoe.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
2.26 lbs
Upper
Recycled mesh, nubuck leather
Lining
GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
Flood Height
3.0 in
Last Board/Shank
Not specified
The biggest drawback to the Anacapa 2 is the extra-large and roomy fit. While it's accommodating for most foot types, the width and excessive interior volume makes it sloppy on rough terrain. Some might be able to size down to create a slightly trimmer ride. When we want to combine cushy comfort with tougher terrain, such as scrambling over deadfalls or navigating steep granite traverses, we often laced up the slimmer and more agile Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX instead. We also had to get used to the Swallowtail design as it extends beyond the natural heel more than other shoes do, but even our longest striding testers came to like the Anacapa's heel after a few hikes, particularly for cruising flatter trails. If you'd prefer a more traditional heel design, the Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex performs well in technical terrain but also impressed us for its all-around stability. All in all, the Anacapa 2 is a high-scoring model and is the shoe we would heartily recommend to someone looking for a super comfortable option for where flatland trails and long miles are the norm.
Softer rubber outsole might wear faster than harder soles
The Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX is the best waterproof trail shoe for hikers who like to go light and fast. Each shoe weighed less than a pound, even in our tester's size 14, helping these svelte shoes feel agile on all terrain. “When a trail braided then disappeared for long sections, the trim build of these shoes let me cruise through rocky alpine landscapes. I could step through boggy meadows and hop over old logs without tripping up,” Chris said. For long, fast day hikes that might get gnarly, this is our new favorite go-to. The Trail Tread Eco tread was among the most grippy, letting us traverse tricky trails with ease. Still, because they are not overbuilt, they are comfortable on light trails as well.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
1.97 lbs
Upper
Recycled polyester
Lining
GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
Flood Height
3.62 in (size 14)
Last Board/Shank
Not specified
While the aggressive, relatively soft tread on the Katabatic LT Low GTX seems to rival mountain goat traction by conforming to rocky cracks and angles, it could wear down a little faster than harder rubber compounds. Similarly, the softer, flexible sole isn't fantastic if you need to bite your edges into soft forest duff while side-hilling in the mountains. Check out the Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof if you need a stiffer sole — or the non-waterproof Moab 3 version if you want more ventilation. Still, if you're tired of clunky shoes that have to create comfort through massive slabs of foam, these Oboz trail shoes are for you.
We felt surprisingly agile and confident in these lightweight hikers, thoroughly enjoying their comfort and traction over long miles and tough trails. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The La Sportiva Spire GTX is one of the most stable and supportive hiking shoes we've tested, making it great for backpacking. Its boot-like stability excels on steep and rocky trails, giving us a sense of control and predictability with each step. Despite the low-cut ankle height, the heel pocket keeps our heels locked in while the rest of the burly synthetic upper supports the entire foot. Unlike the latest ultralight trail running shoes with squishy soft soles, the rigid footbed seems to ignore sharp rocks like a shield. “I like how I can scramble over uneven terrain and feel like the Spire GTX always makes a solid connection with the ground,” Chris says. “It's not as cushy as some options, but the supportive fit kept my feet comfortable after carrying a weekend backpacking load.” The Gore-Tex Surround waterproof membrane is particularly breathable by working in tandem with a series of innovative vents built into the midsole.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
2.06 lbs
Upper
Abrasion-resistant mesh
Lining
Gore-Tex Surround
Flood Height
4.5 in (size 14)
Last Board/Shank
Molded EVA
When the Spire GTX first came out years ago, many used it more as a trail runner, though we now feel it most differentiates itself from the competition as a lightweight backpacking shoe due to its next-level support. Because it's relatively lightweight, we still believe it's great for fast packers and speedy thru-hikers who prioritize support. The aggressive Vibram XS Trek rubber sole bites into soft forest debris with ease, and the unique “Impact Braking System” softens heel strikes on descents and hard ground. The fit is a bit snug, though, so those with wider feet may want to consider the Oboz Sawtooth X Low Waterproof for its roomier toe box and wide size options. If you'd rather go with a cushier option that's still quite tough, the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX is crazy comfortable and great for covering miles. Of course, if you need a shoe that can handle steep granite pitches and deep brushy forests as easily as packed dirt trails, the Spire is a dependable choice.
With a trim, supportive fit and aggressive tread, the La Sportiva Spire GTX provided trustworthy footing on all sorts of surfaces and situations while hiking in rugged areas. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The waterproof/breathable Gore-Tex Surround membrane kept our feet dry, giving us confidence to step into water when finding the safest path on slick rocks. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The Spire GTX soles uses the La Sportiva Impact Braking System to soften steep downhill descents while maintaining sure footing. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The new Hoka Speedgoat 7 is a big improvement over its previous version, making it a more comfortable, ultralight, trail-eating winner. It now features a softer, more responsive and springy midsole that seems to protect your feet by swallowing up sharp rocks and roots. The Vibram MegaGrip sole has improved coverage for traction and durability. The midfoot is softer but offers a more accommodating fit with surprisingly good support. “I tend to walk more than run on trails, but wow, I was impressed by how light and cushy the Speedgoat 7 feels,” Chris says. “I was expecting slop and looseness on steep descents, but my foot stayed put, giving me confidence to trust the ride and enjoy my hike.”
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
1.53 lbs
Upper
RPET woven textile
Lining
None
Flood Height
2.75 in
Last Board/Shank
None
The biggest drawback to the Speedgoat 7 is sizing. It definitely fits a half-size short, so most people will need to size up. In fact, Hoka even recommends sizing up in this iteration. Part of the need to size up is the shape of the inward-angling toe box. This seems to help with keeping your foot secure on downhill sections, but, depending on the shape of your foot, it can push on big toes. If toe space is critical to your on-trail comfort, opt for the wide version, or check out the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4, which pairs a super roomy toe box with great rear-foot and heel stability. The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX is a bit heavier, but it's waterproof and has a roomier toebox. Still, if you like to go fast and light, the Speedgoat 7 lives up to its name.
The massive midsole uses a special supercritical EVA foam that creates a cushioned, responsive ride even on solid rock and long steps. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Weighing far less than most hiking shoes, the Speedgoat 7 helps us feel agile when rock hopping and exploring off trail. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The new tread pattern grabs nicely on loose dirt and gravel trails, sticks to granite, and has increased coverage for better durability. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 is awesome for people who like to hike in hot weather. When we took it to the trails in temperatures exceeding 95° Fahrenheit, the light, meshy upper let air escape with each step, keeping our feet reasonably comfortable. Its aggressive traction let us handle sandy, hard-packed ascents and descents in arid areas, but it was also a capable cruiser on trails in Idaho forests. “For dry, summertime hiking, this is the shoe I want on my feet,” Chris noted. “I thought the non-Speed version, the Merrell Moab 3, was pretty great for warm weather, but the Speed 2 is definitely more comfortable.”
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
1.89 lbs
Upper
Nylon ripstop, TPU
Lining
Recycled mesh
Flood Height
1.37 in (size 14)
Last Board/Shank
Not listed
The biggest drawback to the fair-weather Merrell Moab Speed 2 is the lack of support on very steep ground. “While the footbed and sole are remarkably stable and supportive on common trails, I had to ratchet down the laces to keep my foot from distorting the upper,” Chris reported. “This is most noticeable on steep, side-hilling situations.” If off-trail exploring is your thing, the Moab 3 has leather sections built into the upper that improve stability over steep ground. Similarly, the Hoka Speedgoat 7 did a decent job of letting our feet breathe, though they're not as airy as the Moab Speed 2.
When the sun is blasting down and you want to get a hike in anyway, the airy Moab Speed 2 shoes won't make your feet overheat. Just remember they're not waterproof. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 impressed us with its ability to keep our feet happy over long distances. We've had some testers tackle long miles while hiking up non-technical trails to enjoy the view from peaks over 13,000 feet in elevation. “I have a fairly narrow foot, but I must admit I appreciated the extra-roomy, anatomical toe box,” Chris noted. “The 5mm heel-to-toe drop with the thicker midsole also feels great underfoot, more like the typical shoes and boots I wear most often.” The Vibram XS Trek EVO outsole is tuned for cruising, and they are even comfortable off the trail. The lugs are a bit short and curvy for biting into thick forest duff, but they handled all the sandy gravel and loose dirt on trails with ease.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight (per pair, size 14)
1.68 lbs
Upper
Recycled mesh, PU bumper
Lining
None
Flood Height
1.5 in
Last Board/Shank
None
The heel pocket feels secure, and the back half of the Ultraventure 4 offers surprising security and stability without sacrificing comfort. Breathability is great, but it's not waterproof. The forefoot is a bit too soft and flexible for carrying backpack loads or navigating technical terrain. If you'd like more forefoot support, the Hoka Speedgoat 7 offers a similar cushy ride, though you do give up the generous toe box to get it. If an anatomical foot shape and roomy toe box are critical, the Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof is also ridiculously comfortable. However, the Lone Peak 9 has a flat, zero-drop midsole, so we recommend the Ultraventure 4 to hikers who prefer a more typical midsole drop and more support throughout.
While the upper and forefoot is too flexible for navigating technical terrain, we easily climbed forest pitches, scampered across rocks, and pounded out the miles on packed dirt while testing the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 shoes. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Product Comparison Table
Wherever your hiking shoes take you, we hope you are comfortable and supported the entire time. Credit: Chris Maxcer
How We Tested
Since the category of hiking shoes is broad, our review staff and editors spend much time sifting through the countless models before settling on the most promising shoes for testing. This starts with extensive research, ultimately selecting interesting, exciting, or highly regarded models. We then buy each pair and ship them out to our expert review staff, who spend untold hours hiking around in multiple types of terrain for each shoe. We use our predetermined metrics to judge each pair and see how they perform against each other. Once we have walked many miles in each of these hiking shoes, we tally up our results to share with you. For more on our test process, see our How We Test article.
We tested men's hiking shoes across six performance metrics:
Comfort (30% of total weighted score)
Support (25% weighting)
Traction (20% weighting)
Durability (15% weighting)
Water Resistance (5% weighting)
Weight (5% weighting)
We performed more than 10 individual assessments on each hiker, and our testers wore each pair in the real world for a minimum of 20 miles to determine long-term wear and changes in performance over time as they break in and potentially wear out. Each shoe was scored on a scale of 1 through 10 for each metric, resulting in an overall score. While looking at the overall score to see which models were the best across all metrics is useful, you should also pay attention to how each model performs in specific applications.
Hiking shoes can have big differences between different models
Years ago, hiking shoes were quite similar. Today's hikers, however, can find pairs that prioritize cushy comfort over rugged traction and support. Some look and feel more like running shoes with aggressive tread while others look like low-top hiking boots. Choose thick foam midsoles when comfort is your priority and choose stiffer midsoles for exploring rugged terrain and wearing backpacks.
When we tested these hiking shoes, we hiked many miles of trails, scrambled over rocks, evaluated traction, plus weighed each shoe and measured flood heights.
Why Trust GearLab
This review was a team effort launched by Ryan Huetter with a tag-team effort including Ben Applebaum-Bauch and Chris Maxcer, all of which pounded out hundreds of miles to test these shoes. Ryan is a full-time mountain guide who spends more than 200 days a year hiking, climbing, and recreating on and off-trail. As an IFMGA Certified Mountain Guide through the American Mountain Guides Association, Ryan is an outdoor professional, and hiking on a trail is his daily commute. Ben started his outdoor career as a guide on multi-week backpacking and cycling trips. He is an avid distance hiker, completing thru-hikes of iconic American trails, including the Pacific Crest Trail, Long Trail, Oregon Coast, Pinhoti, and Superior Hiking Trail. Chris is an outdoor enthusiast and gear tester who has evaluated and reviewed hundreds of pairs of hiking and backpacking boots, wading boots, water shoes, and more, logging 200+ miles each year while adventuring in the Northwest.
Our team spent many miles on the trails testing these hiking boots, all to find out which were the best.
Analysis and Test Results
We tested thoroughly, taking meticulous notes along the way so that we could score them all using a set of pre-defined testing metrics to help you find the right hikers for you.
Worse Value
Better Value
What's the Best Value?
The Columbia Crestwood crushes our value graph because it delivers outstanding performance at a price that's half as much as most of the competition. We recommend these shoes to anyone on a tight budget who wants a good performance for warm-weather hiking on mild to moderate trails. If you need a waterproof shoe, the Columbia Facet 75 costs a bit more, but they're better for rainy day hikes.
While the Merrell Moab 3 costs more than the Columbia models, the out-of-box comfort, durability, and stability make it one of our top can't-go-wrong recommendations for new hikers. It's available in non-waterproof options for dry hiking and waterproof options for wet weather and shallow stream crossings.
Of course, some of the newer models priced under $200, like the Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex, deliver excellent build quality that will last for many miles, making them good investments for serious hikers who like to cover a lot of ground in varied conditions.
What a great day for a dog walk on the area's beautiful trail network! The Crestwood shoes are a stand-out budget buy for these kinds of walks. Credit: Ryan Huetter
Comfort
Comfort is king when it comes to hiking footwear. There is simply no reason to choose a shoe that does not feel great right out of the box. Luckily, we are past the days of excruciating break-in periods; modern hiking shoes are lighter and use less rigid materials, which allows them to be ready to hit the trail from the moment you lace them up.
When we test for comfort, we consider the entire shoe. We scrutinize material stiffness, lacing systems, midsole materials, and padding around the tongue and collar. We consider shape and roominess, evaluating length, width, and volume against other shoes of the same size. We also consider breathability, which can become a particularly important comfort factor on hot summer hikes.
When stepping from rock to rock, well-made uppers let your feet flex naturally while also keeping your foot secure to the footbed. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The thick midsole in the Hoka Anacapa 2 creates a cushy ride that takes design cues from the company's plush running shoes. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Lacing systems and tongue padding can sometimes make or break a shoe design by creating or removing pressure points. The laces are thin in the Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex, but the tongue is well padded, which helps maintain comfort when on the go. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The outstanding fit of the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 starts with a soft and pliable upper that snugged well around the heel but let our forefeet bend freely. The extra large anatomically designed toe box gave our toes plenty of room to roam, but they never banged around inside because the lacing system was about as perfect as it gets.
The Topo Ultraventure 4 gives plenty of room for toes, which is particularly nice after long days on the trail when feet tend to swell. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof has an even roomier toe box and wide fit, making these shoes particularly comfortable for those with wide feet.
Altra shoes tend to have the roomiest toe box designs, with flat footbeds often designed to evoke a sense of connection with the ground. Credit: Chris Maxcer
After a disappointingly stiff midsole on the previous generation Speedgoat 6, the new ultralight Hoka Speedgoat 7 is back with a new super-critically foamed EVA that offers both cushion and a springy feel. It made cruising on rocky trails feel like we were striding across a backyard lawn.
We're big fans of the thick and responsive Hoka Speedgoat 7 midsoles. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Most of the shoes with synthetic uppers were quite comfortable right away, but we were also impressed with some options that use a strategic blend of durable leather. The Merrell Moab 3 took a three mile hike to soften up, but its accommodating fit and great lacing system let us run snug or loose with great results. The Columbia Crestwood has a similarly comfortable upper.
The leather side straps in the Merrell Moab 3 provide lateral support but also allow for comfortable foot flexion. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The La Sportiva Spire GTX has a more durable synthetic upper, giving it great stability and support, but its snug fit may not be right for those with larger, high-volume feet. Unlike most of the shoes in this review, it's not available in a wide option. One tester with feet that run a bit narrow absolutely loved the feel and trim ride.
The La Sportiva Spire GTX fit snug and a bit narrow compared to most hiking shoes. Credit: Ethan Maxcer
Two of the most useful attributes when considering comfort is the overall fit and footbed feel and breathability.
Overall Fit and Footbed Feel
The Hoka Speedgoat 7 has the best blend of cushion with its responsive, springy midsole.
The Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof has a lower, flat footbed but feels surprisingly plush. Some may be able to size down for a trimmer ride.
The On Cloudrock Low Waterproof uses an innovative hollow midsole that helps it absorb shock. The somewhat vague fit in the upper makes it a versatile choice for many foot types.
Everyone's foot is different, so you can benefit from knowing if your foot is narrow, wide, or has a high volume. In addition, fit characteristics can varying significantly, even from the same brand. For instance, the Hoka Speedgoat 7 fits small with an angled toe box while the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX fits long and wide with a roomier toe box. We recommend ordering a few different shoes and keeping the ones that fit the best.
Breathability
The non-waterproof Merrell Moab Speed 2 has a thin, meshy upper that breathes well. It's our favorite shoe for hot-weather hiking. The Topo Ultraventure 4 comes in at a close second.
The waterproof On Cloudrock Low Waterproof, Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex, and Hoka Anacapa 2 Low breathe well, but they're still much warmer than most non-waterproof options.
All leather models like the Keen Targhee IV Low can retain more heat on hot summer hikes, making our feet feel clammy and our socks damp.
The Merrell Speed 2's lightweight upper with plenty of large mesh holes kept our feet cool and dry on hot hikes. If you suffer from sweaty feet or hike in deserts, this is a great option. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Looking inside the shoe, sunlight shines through the airy mesh upper of the Topo Ultraventure 4. Credit: Chris Maxcer
The La Sportiva Spire GTX uses a Gore-Tex Surround waterproof breathable membrane with innovative underfoot venting built into the midsole. It breathes well considering its snug, supportive fit. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Comfort is one of the most personal characteristics, but some shoes are simply better cushioned and fit more types of feet successfully. We hope our comparisons help point you toward the right shoes for your feet for more enjoyable hikes.
Thirteen miles in, our feet feel great, thanks to the Speedgoats on this approach hike to this backcountry climb. Lightweight, well-cushioned shoes can increase on-trail comfort on rocky trails. Credit: Ryan Huetter
Support
How much support a shoe provides depends on several factors, including the thickness and materials of the midsole, the thickness of the outsole, the shape of the last, and, to a lesser extent, the insole. An ideal hiking shoe is stiff from heel to midfoot but flexible upfront. Most models we reviewed include a shank between the midsole and outsole, increasing stiffness and protecting the foot over rough terrain. Stability is also affected by the forefoot width and ankle collar height.
If ankle protection and support are a key concern for you, consider a pair of hiking boots. While not always the most comfortable option for day hikes, the extra weight and warmth might be worth it if it stops you from rolling your ankle. We've outlined our picks for men and women and rounded them up in our hiking boots review.
To investigate stiffness underfoot, we tested the lateral torsion of each model. Reliable torsional support reduces the risk of injury in uneven terrain and when carrying a load. Holding the front of the shoe in one hand and the heel in the other, we twisted the shoe, similar to wringing out a towel. The more twist resistance, the greater rigidity in the sole. This rigidity improves a shoe's support when moving through talus and rough terrain or scrambling and hopping boulders. The Keen Targhee IV provides strong torsional stiffness at the cost of some comfort while striding. The X Ultra 5, on the other hand, manages to be both comfortable and supportive with its ADV-C chassis.
The Salomon X Ultra 5 is one of the most supportive shoes we have tested, which is why we feel confident in tricky situations in them. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Those who desire a hefty underfoot structure may also find the Facet 75 OutDry a solid option. With an especially wide base that our testers found to reduce the likelihood of ankle rolls, it felt similar to the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low. The Facet also comes with a robust heel guard, which secures the back of the foot. We were pleased that all the shoes we reviewed flexed sufficiently in the forefoot. While this flex and softness of materials can help with comfort, if the design is not well executed, it can leave you feeling uneasy and vulnerable.
Supportive shoes, like the Merrell Moab 3 shown in this video, maintain stability when stepping on uneven rocks on steep slopes, inspiring mile-eating confidence. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Additionally, we measured the forefoot at its widest point on each shoe. Wide bases provide a stable foundation for powering through each step. The Hoka Anacapa 2 Low has the widest of all the forefoot widths at 5 inches, and the Merrell model tied with the Columbia Facet for the second broadest forefoot at 4.75 inches. The Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof also has a very wide forefoot with a massively wide toe box, but the sole width doesn't extend as far out beyond the width of the insole. We found it to be stable, particularly when climbing. We also measured the height of the ankle collar (from the footbed to the highest ankle point) to check ankle stability. While ankle protection is more of a thing with hiking boots, we still appreciate a pair of hiking shoes that offers more stability than a typical trail runner.
We love shoes that have a hefty midsole, such as the BOOST midsole featured on the Terrex Free Hiker, which protects the feet during rugged use. Credit: Ryan Huetter
However, finely tuned models can surprise without needing bulky midsoles. Despite its unassuming trim build, one tester was surprised at how cushy the Katabatic LT Low GTX felt underfoot. We attribute some of this success to its great insole, which we also consider. Some manufacturers view the insole as just an opportunity to add cushioning and improve the fit of the footbed. We appreciate manufacturers that take the insole as an opportunity to add support to the heel and arch. The stiffest insole award goes to the Keen models, while the Salomon and Merrell products also beefed up their insoles by adding a second, more dense layer of foam to the back half of the foot. This extra support does not take away from comfort in the footbed. While many hikers see buying third-party insoles as automatic, hiking shoes are not cheap, and we like included insoles that aren't either.
The best insoles work with the shoe to increase support, such as the Salomon X Ultra 5 (top left) and Oboz Katabatic LT Low (second from top left). Both vary the material at the heel to reduce unwanted side-to-side heel movement. Credit: Chris Maxcer
We also like to consider the stack height of the shoe, as in how tall you are standing above the ground, as this can decrease the feeling of stability unless that height is remedied by a well-designed heel cup, or by the width of the shoe. We found that a model like the Anacapa 2 did a much better job at improving stability despite being quite tall than the Oboz Sawtooth X Low, which did not extend the ankle collar high enough.
Traction
Traction is a fundamental trait to consider in a hiking shoe. The basis for a shoe's traction is the outsole. Made from rubber compounds and molded into different shapes called lugs, the amount of grip the shoe's outsole directly relates to how secure you will feel, whether you're walking the dog on a local trail or scrambling up peaks deep in the backcountry. Depending on your application, you may want a shoe with softer or harder rubber. Soft rubber will conform better to smooth surfaces such as rock slabs, while harder rubber will resist deformation and bite into loose terrain better while also lasting longer. Some companies outsource their rubber selection to well-known companies like Vibram, while others choose an in-house or proprietary rubber blend.
Lug pattern and shape will also impact your shoe's ability to hold on to the terrain you are on. Wide and shallow lugs give more surface area contact, making them more appropriate for packed trails and firm surfaces, while deeper and sharper cut lugs will provide a better grip on loose trails, mud, and snow. Shoes such as the Salomon X Ultra 5 and the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker Gore-Tex 2.0 Low have great traction on various surface conditions.
Midsole inserts made of molded plastic also contribute to a shoe's traction by giving the user a more stable and secure platform to edge upon, making a dime edge seem like a much broader ledge to use as a foothold.
Shoes with outstanding traction, like the Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex shown here, can still bite confidently on mixed terrain even when your foot placement doesn't give you full contact. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Each model was tested side-by-side on five separate surface types to determine the shoes' overall traction score. We even wore different shoes on each foot to compare them directly when trekking through the test areas. First, we walked up and down dry granite slabs. Most models performed well in these scenarios, with the La Sportiva Spire GTX and Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX sticking best to the steepest slopes. Both pairs have lugs that allow for lots of surface area contact.
Wet rocks generally produce mediocre results for all shoes, offering some slippage mixed with good traction, there were a couple of standouts and outliers. The Adidas Terrex Free Hiker Gore-Tex 2.0 Low impressed us on wet rock, and gripped very well on a polished, wet granite slab, while the Hoka Speedgoat 7 stuck in place nearly as well. The Keen Targhee IV slipped a bit more than we expect, while the Oboz Sawtooth X Low Waterproof slid easily, with one tester facing a near fall off of a talus slope.
When we consider traction, such as with the Katabatic LT Low shown above, we wear each shoe over difficult slopes and types of ground, stepping up, down, and sideways in multiple directions. This attention to detail helps us determine situations where some shoes work better than others. Credit: Chris Maxcer
In our traction tests, we also hustled up slopes of loose sediment, and the more aggressive tread of the Salomon X Ultra 5 dug in better than the rest. We found a trail covered in mud from the thawing snow on the eastern side of the Sierra in Spring. Again, the X Ultra's deep and multi-directional lugs cut through the mud efficiently, finding hidden rocks or more stable soil to gain purchase. The Merrell Moab Speed 2 and La Sportiva Spire GTX share similarly aggressive tread patterns that bite well through loose materials like forest duff.
The rear section of the Spire GTX sole is particularly good at slowing and cushioning descents in steep terrain. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Matching shoes to your most common trail conditions helps you achieve the most out of your outsoles. Consider the ground you hike most often.
Outsole Material
Outsole
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
Vibram Megagrip rubber
Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex
Contragrip MA rubber
On Cloudrock Low Waterproof
Missiongrip rubber
Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX
Trail Tread Eco rubber
Oboz Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
Trail Tread rubber
Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof
MaxTrac
La Sportiva Spire GTX
Vibram XS Trek with Impact Brake System
Merrell Moab Speed 2
Vibram TC5+ rubber
Columbia Facet 75 OutDry
Adapt Trax
Adidas Terrex Free Hiker Gore-Tex 2.0 Low
Continental rubber
Merrell Moab 3
Vibram TC5+
Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof
Vibram TC5+
Columbia Crestwood
OmniGrip
Keen Targhee IV Low
Keen.Rugged
Danner Trail 2650 GTX
Vibram 460 with Megagrip
Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4
Vibram XS Trek EVO
Hoka Speedgoat 7
Vibram Megagrip
Finally, we walked up and down some gentle snow-covered slopes warmed into a slushy state by the midday sun. The Salomon X Ultra 5 was a champ while kicking in steps in the snow, especially when going up. Coming down, we again loved outsoles with heel brakes, which tended to catch a sliding foot. The Spire GTX also did well in the snow. Overall, the X Ultra 5 showcases the best all-around traction, while the softer Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX stuck remarkably well to all dry rock, making them quite fun when scrambling over boulders and slabs on high-elevation alpine treks.
The Oboz Katabatic LT is an excellent choice for high altitude hiking where traction is essential. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Do Wider Soles Create Better Traction?
Yes and no. Sometimes wider soles create more surface area to create more friction and stopping power . . . but on some surfaces, particularly loose or slick surfaces, a wider sole can create more “float” that distributes your weight over a wider area, resulting in less friction and less stopping power. Weird, we know. In our experience, the tread pattern is the most important factor, with deep, aggressive treads tending to create better traction overall. When cruising mostly flat land, we love how wider soles distribute our weight and reduce the impacts, but on rugged terrain, we prefer narrower soles that allow for more precise foot placement, which in turn can create more real-world traction.
Compared to the fairly narrow sole of the Oboz Katabatic LT shown on the left, the extra sole width on the On Cloudrock Low (right) is more effective at providing increased impact protection on flatland cruising than it is at producing traction on rugged terrain. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Durability
The are many trade-offs when designing hiking footwear, and the cost for a more durable shoe is commonly more weight. When a manufacturer focuses on making lightweight shoes, durability is less of a focus. Full leather uppers tend to be more durable than synthetics but also weigh more. Rubber-covered toe boxes increase durability in that high-wear area but also add to the shoe's weight. Durable, dense rubber soles are also heavier than softer rubber. Your footwear takes more punishment than any other kind of hiking gear you wear, making craft, materials, and design an important part of choosing a pair that will age well.
The hikers we found to be the most durable were the Hoka Anacapa, Keen Targhee IV, and Oboz Sawtooth X Low. These shoes have impressively robust mesh on the upper and a solid interface between the upper and the sole. We experienced zero delamination issues, even after trying hard to beat these things up. Nothing seemed to phase them.
Notice how much leather is used on these shoes, which will help them take a beating over time. You might pay for that durability in weight, though. Credit: Ryan Huetter
A common point of failure to watch out for in new, especially lightweight options, is the eyelets and lacing system. In an effort to reduce weight — and let's face it, sometimes manufacturing costs — some brands are using fabric eyelets instead of metal, polymers, or leather reinforcements. Fabric eyelets offer new style looks, but they can wear through and break before your soles run out of traction.
Our only major quibble with the otherwise awesome On Cloudrock Low Waterproof is the fabric and cord-based eyelets. Not only are they annoying to snug up and lace tightly, we've seen too many similar eyelets burn through to failure to trust them on hard technical ground 20 miles from the trailhead. Credit: Chris Maxcer
If you choose a version that uses fabric eyelets, you can improve their longevity by slowly tightening each section of your laces one at a time instead of yanking on the laces hard to tighten all at once. Why does this work? Lacing slower reduces friction that can fray fabric eyelets prematurely.
How Can I Make My Hiking Shoes Last Longer?
Mud and sand left on the upper can speed material breakdown, so cleaning and treating your footwear increases its life expectancy. Warm water and a soft brush is your best tactic for cleaning. Nikwax offers a line of leather and fabric conditioners, including products for suede leather and synthetic fabrics. Common wear areas, like the flex points on the forefoot and seams that are prone to scuffing, can be reinforced. Applying Gear Aid Seam Grip or a similar sealer keeps out dirt and sand, prolongs use, and has the added benefit of keeping water out.
Water Resistance
It's no secret dry feet provide more comfort and warmth than wet ones. Moisture and water in the footbed also increase the likelihood of blisters. Often, waterproofing makes hiking shoes less breathable and, therefore, warmer. Plus, the waterproof linings tend to increase the price of the shoe. Most of the shoes we reviewed have waterproof liners except for the Columbia Crestwood, Merrell Moab Speed 2 and Moab 3, Hoka Speedgoat 7, and Topo Ultraventure 4. If you hike somewhere that doesn't get much precipitation or spring runoff, a non-waterproof shoe might be best for you.
While flood height doesn't account for the whole picture of waterproofing, it is important if you frequent stream crossings. The flood height refers to the level at which water pours in, whether that be the top of the shoe or an opening near the tongue or ankle.
On some shoes, like the Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof, the flood point comes from a low spot just below the ankle. Sometimes you have to tiptoe quickly in deeper stream crossings to stay dry! Credit: Chris Maxcer
The Spire had an impressive flood height of 4.5 in in our admittedly large tester's size 14, but the Cloudrock Low Waterproof and X Ultra i5 Gore-Tex weren't far behind with measurements of 3.87 and 3.86 inches. In general, we've found that 3.5 inches of flood height makes shallow mountain stream crossings very doable. Those with 3.0 inches and low mean we have to pay more attention while crossing or step more quickly in the shallowest spots possible.
Waterproofing Material
Waterproofing
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
Salomon X Ultra 5 Gore-Tex
Gore-Tex membrane
On Cloudrock Low Waterproof
Waterproof membrane
Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX
GORE-TEX Invisible Fit
Oboz Sawtooth X Low Waterproof
B-DRY waterproof membrane
Altra Lone Peak 9 Waterproof
Hydroguard waterproof membrane by Cosmo
La Sportiva Spire GTX
Gore-Tex Surround
Merrell Moab Speed 2
Recycled mesh
Columbia Facet 75 OutDry
OutDry
Adidas Terrex Free Hiker Gore-Tex 2.0 Low
Gore-Tex membrane
Merrell Moab 3
Mesh lining
Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof
Waterproof membrane
Columbia Crestwood
None
Keen Targhee IV Low
Keen.Dry membrane
Danner Trail 2650 GTX
Gore-Tex membrane
Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4
None
Hoka Speedgoat 7
None
Beyond flood height, we also considered how readily the upper absorbs water and their performance in our waterproof challenge. After a couple of months of hiking, we headed to a small mountain stream in the Eastern Sierra. We checked for leaks and splashed around in water deep enough to cover the forefoot. We walked around and flexed the forefoot to see if the added stress caused any leakage. After five minutes, we removed the shoes to see if any water made it inside. A handful of models emerged from the water on top, including the Salomon X Ultra 5, La Sportiva Spire, On Cloudrock Low Waterproof, Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX, and Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX.
Our flood height test is one indicator of a shoe's ability to let you tromp through puddles and streams without soaking your socks. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Many of the models that we tested come in both standard and “waterproof” options (a designation in the name like “GTX” for Gore-Tex or “Dry” usually gives it away). Popular liners include options from Gore-Tex or eVent, while some manufacturers, like Keen, use a proprietary membrane. We chose to test the waterproof versions as much as possible because the average hiker often encounters wet conditions, from water crossings and muck to slush and precipitation. However, most manufacturers produce waterproof and non-waterproof versions of their hiking shoes. If you don't need the protection, the non-waterproof versions are almost always cooler, more breathable, and cost less.
Waterproofing isn't always necessarily a good thing. If you hike in regions where there isn't much water, you probably don't need a waterproof shoe. While advances in waterproof membranes have improved and are still somewhat breathable, none are as breathable as a non-waterproofed shoe. For warm weather we love the Merrell Moab Speed 2 and the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4. We highly recommend considering these if you aren't going to be crossing streams or snow fields.
If heavy dew and water crossings are common where you hike, consider choosing a dark color option for your shoes. This allows them to dry quickly under the sun.
The Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 is a very light shoe, though not waterproof. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Weight
Light is right for footwear. One of the benefits of a hiking shoe over a full boot is the significant weight shed from every step while still providing a bit more stability and durability over a trail runner or tennis shoe. To compare the different models accurately, we weigh each one ourselves on a digital scale straight out of the box.
The different pairs in our lineup ranged between 1.34 to 2.66 pounds. That pound and a half difference might not seem like much on paper, but we noticed it underfoot. The Hoka Speedgoat 7 is the lightest pair that we tested and manages to provide solid comfort and support, despite the impressively light weight.
The Hoka Speedgoat 7 is the lightest shoe we tested, weighing barely over 1.5 pounds per pair, even in size 14! Credit: Chris Maxcer
The Facet 75 OutDry is also a very light pair, though it's worth noting that it does not have the rugged structure that some of the more supportive models will be able to provide. While our size 14 pair of the new Salomon X Ultra 5 weighed 2.1 lbs, we expect that Salomon's reported weight of 1.68 lbs for a size 11 pair will likely be accurate, too. The Ultra 5s should offer more longevity and stiffer support for most hikers. We think this balance of low weight and support is unmatched in all models we have tested, and a big reason the X Ultra 5 wins so much praise from our testers. On the opposite end, the Keen Targhee IV is the heaviest pair we tested, but it's also incredibly stable and clearly built with longevity in mind.
The heaviest shoe in our review, the Targhee IV, tips the scales at 2.66 lbs. Credit: Ryan Huetter
While weight is an important trait, you do not always have to choose between weight and performance. The Spire GTX weighs a hair over 2 pounds but is among the more comfortable, stable, and supportive options. The Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX weighs less than 2 pounds, but its trim design remains supportive on technical ground due to this foot-hugging upper and narrower heel that made the shoe feel like part of our feet. Most of our favorite shoes hover right around two pounds. More than two pounds and the shoe will likely boast better durability thanks to heavier, natural materials, as well as improved support thanks to a burlier midsole construction.
The Columbia Crestwoods balance weight and cost, and you end up with a pretty light shoe that doesn't break the bank. Credit: Ryan Huetter
How to Choose Hiking Shoes for Men
Types of Hiking Footwear
Our testing team carefully evaluated everything from comfort to overall durability of each hiking shoe model in this review. There are a few different types of hiking footwear that is appropriate in different terrain choices. Below we identify the main options as well as their best applications on the trail.
Hiking Shoes: Hiking shoes are built for the trail. They feature midsole construction that helps to resist the jarring impacts of foot strikes while hiking on trails, often employ waterproof membranes to improve their utility in varied environments, and have better traction to deal with the many surface conditions that may be encountered. These shoes will provide much more comfort and protection when hiking on rockier trails, and will give more support for those carrying backpacks up to 25-30 pounds.
Hiking Boots: Hiking boots provide the highest levels of foot protection. They most often feature a shank, or stiffener, to impact more stability to the midsole which is useful in challenging terrain. The materials used in the upper are commonly heavier-duty than one might find in a trail runner or a hiking shoe, so durability is improved. One of the biggest hallmarks of a pair of hiking boots is the tall ankle collar, which provides extra support when carrying big loads (35+ pounds) or when traveling over uneven ground, which can also be beneficial for those with known ankle issues. All this protection comes at a cost, though, as hiking boots are usually much heavier than the average hiking shoe.
Trail Running Shoes: Trail running shoes are essentially beefed up running shoes that are designed to deal with more varied terrain that might be encountered than just running on pavement, yet they have become quite popular as shoes to be worn while just out hiking. They are built with lighter-weight materials and have a midsole that flexes to the shape of the terrain rather than adding stiffness like a more traditional hiking shoe. They may forego waterproofing membranes for greater breathability. For day hiking, or even backpacking with lighter-weight packs, a top-rated trail running shoe is a great option to consider.
Weight and Fit
We recommend ordering a few pairs of shoes that you are interested in with the intention of finding the one that fits the best. While weight is worth considering, a shoe that is comfortable and durable is going to take you much further. Lightweight hiking shoes can offer a ton of energy savings, yet they sacrifice the additional security and protection of a beefy outsole and substantial ankle cuff. Modern technology is allowing for lighter and lighter options that can still offer performance, comfort, and support on the trail; selecting the best support-to-weight ratio can make a huge difference in your hiking experience. Planning on wearing your shoes with thick socks? Sizing up can offer a little more wiggle room for winter socks. This can also help prevent blisters and toe jams that often occur with long downhills.
Fully synthetic hiking shoes (first) are usually much lighter than those with leather uppers (second).
Waterproof Performance
No one wants to hike for an extended period of time with wet feet. It is important to consider the locations that you'll be hiking in order to properly select a water-resistant shoe over a breathable mesh option. If you're planning to hike in the Pacific Northwest you'll likely want a high-performing waterproof shoe. Planning to hike near the desert at low elevations? You'll likely want to forgo the additional heat provided by a water-resistant design and opt for a more breathable mesh in order to maximize comfort on the trail. Most shoes in this review feature a breathable waterproof membrane or a chemical treatment on the upper that allows water to bead off of the upper. Waterproof membranes can be a great choice for those hiking in colder climates while they can be a disadvantage for those who are seeking breathability in hot and dry climates. Most brands offer the same shoe in both a waterproof and non-waterproof option so that you can select the best option for you.
One of the benefits of waterproof hiking shoes is how easy it is to clean them off when you get them dirty, for instance, if you accidentally step in deep mud. The slick outer upper of these Lone Peak 9 Waterproof hikers is particularly easy to wash off. Credit: Chris Maxcer
Conclusion
A good pair of hiking shoes is one of the best things that you can treat yourself to if you want to get out on the trail. We tested each one of these pairs vigorously so that you can have the best information about how to choose the right pair of shoes, and find the ones that are going to match you hiking needs perfectly. Low-cut hiking shoes are our favorite for the days that we don't need a lot of extra support, such as overnight backpacking with lots of weight, or traveling in really gnarly cross-country terrain. We hope that you have found this advice on how to choose the best hiking shoe useful, and be sure to read up on each individual pair so that you can slide your feet into the right shoes for your next adventure.
—Chris Maxcer, Ryan Huetter, and Ben Applebaum-Bauch
