We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
Our backcountry experts have been testing the best women's backpacking backpacks side by side since 2017. This review brings you the 14 best packs on the market today. Our team of lady backpackers hiked hundreds of miles with each of these packs, from overnight excursions in the alpine to week-long expeditions in the backcountry to meandering explorations along coastal bluffs. We fully loaded each pack to determine how well they could handle weight distribution and where their limits were for support and comfort. We used every pocket and scrutinized every strap to assess adjustability, suspension, and comfort. We evaluated how easy it is to reach items while on the trail and how easy or hard it is to stay organized. No matter where your adventures may take you, we are confident that our research will help you choose a backpack to fit your needs.
While only a few of these packs are considered heavy, they are not the lightest packs we review. If you want to break into the world of ounce-shaving ultralight gear, our experts are here for you. And if you're looking for more great women's backpacking gear, we've also thoroughly tested the top women's hiking shoes, the best women's sleeping bags, and the best women's rain jackets to cover all your bases from head to toe.
Editor's Note: We revised our women's backpacking pack review on September 30, 2024, to ensure our lineup is up-to-date. During this update, we added more specs and more information on other packs we recommend as alternatives to our award winners.
Stable and sturdy, comfortable, adjustable, spacious, great suspension
Comfortable, plush padding, highly adjustable, good number of pockets, easy-to-remove brain
Comfortable back panel, breathable, well-placed and sized pockets, useful lateral compression straps, well-featured
Great pockets, intelligent organizational features, well-cushioned, three access points into main compartment, more affordable
Huge main compartment, customizable compression straps, great weight-to-volume ratio
Comfortable, lightweight, supportive suspension, simple design, large pockets
Lightweight, fully featured with pockets and access points, adjustable torso and hip belt
Large U-zip opening, durable, massive side pockets, included hydration/day pack
Supportive under heavy loads, good cushioning on hip belt and shoulder straps, adjustable torso and waist belt, durable materials
Large capacity, thick lumbar padding, large exterior pocket
Two water bottle holsters, durable, lid converts to a daypack, includes raincover
Cons
Hip straps lack padding for curvier bodies, brain doesn't double as a day-pack, small hip belt pockets
Set torso adjustment points, no back stash pocket, brain is difficult to access, rugged textiles lack flexibility
Lower maximum load, less plush padding
Heavy, overbuilt for lighter missions, padding can feel stiff, expensive, less versatile
Large spring-loaded waistband is hard to get into, suspension can feel bulky, expensive
Pricier, feels tall on shorter people
On the heavier side, only available in one size
Hip belt is difficult to adjust, uncomfortable textiles, lacks breathability, expensive
Non-ventilated back panel, fewer organizational features
Mesh pockets lack durability
Bulky, lightly padded harness, small hipbelt pockets
Heavy, too tight side pockets, rigid and hard to move in
Harder to adjust, heavier than some, expensive, wide and rigid back panel, small hip belt pockets
Rigid foam padding on back, limited torso adjustment settings
Bottom Line
This comfortable, well-featured women's backpacking backpack won our hearts because of its easy adjustment points and breezy back panel
Get back to basics with this comfortable and affordable pack that can handle heavy loads with grace while providing adequate ventilation
Both affordable and customizable, this pack comes equipped to tackle a variety of adventures, all in a very weight-conscious and beginner-friendly way
Bringing you exceptional comfort and support for heavy loads with an excellent feature set and spacious pockets
With unparalleled ventilation, comfortable straps, and a full range of adjustable features
Full of neat features, cavernous pockets, and a well-padded back panel segmented by an airy, mesh chimney making it great for warm hikes in the backcountry
With organization at its forefront, this pack is great for the adventurer who wants their gear in order when they reach camp
A lightweight pack with minimalistic suspension and features, a cavernous main compartment, customizable straps, and a tent-like textile feel
A durable, straightforward bag with all the right pockets and suspension that will keep your back, hips, and shoulders comfortable all day
Lightweight and with a comprehensive feature set, but not as comfortable as many others
Plenty of pockets and a large capacity but not as comfortable or well-padded
A beast for carrying substantial loads, this pack is very adjustable but also quite heavy and it restricts movement
Plenty of features and a large capacity, but it lacks the burly suspension and comfort of other packs
Plenty of thoughtful features, but heavy and not as comfortable or adjustable as others
The Osprey Eja 58 takes all of Osprey's tried-and-true qualities and combines them into one comfortable and affordable backpacking backpack for women. This pack has a trampoline back panel, which excels at providing comfort and breathability on long treks. The Eja adjusts up to four inches via an easy-to-use slider on its back panel, making it an option to update your fit on the go — even when your pack is full. This pack includes many thoughtful elements, making it a fantastic backpacking pack for adventure enthusiasts who want a long-lasting pack suitable for all occasions. The removable brain boasts one of the largest and easy-to-access capacities we've seen and when removed, an integrated flap can be secured over the opening of the pack for security. The external compression system that zigzags its way down each side takes a bit of getting used to, but once you dial in your gear and tighten the straps, even heavy loads can be toted with ease.
Our gripes about the Osprey Eja 58 are minimal. First, we found the hip belt pockets are not big enough. Call us high-maintenance, but we like having our phones, maps, lip balms, headlamps, snacks, and more within arm's reach. The limited hip belt pocket space simply cannot accommodate everything we want to keep handy. (If you want spacious hip belt pockets, take a look at the Gregory Deva 60 — we were able to cram quite a lot of stuff into its pockets.) Second, the Eja's less robust hip belt might be uncomfortable on some bodies. However, our testers found that the Eja's hip belt was more flexible than others, which led to extended comfort. Lastly, the Eja does not include many external straps, but the ones it does are well-placed and functional. If you truly need an ultralight pack, the ULA Circuit has an even better weight-to-volume ratio. But if you want a semi-minimalistic pack that can provide long-lasting comfort and breathability without totally breaking the bank, the Eja is our top pick.
The removable lid, thoughtful extra cover, and easy-to-use access point culminate to make the Eja one of our favorite backpacks for a wider variety of adventure seekers.
If you're looking for a full-sized backpack that performs well without costing a fortune, check out the Osprey Renn 65. Our tests showed this is a super comfortable pack with a large capacity that offers a great balance of simplicity and organizational features. The Renn's unique design spreads the 65-liter load laterally, allowing heavy loads to ride comfortably on your hips, while the mesh suspension does much of the heavy lifting. The simple and user-friendly design makes this pack a great option for those who want to take an uncomplicated approach to backpacking. The hip and brain pockets are roomy, and your purchase includes a rain cover. Despite being one of the lowest-priced options we tested, this pack still boasts the comfortable award-winning Osprey suspension many outdoor enthusiasts love. The Renn 65 is a good choice for its unique, comfortable design and advantageous extra features. We wholeheartedly recommend this pack for most backpackers due to its simplicity and comfort.
The spacious main compartment of the Renn 65 can fit almost anything, including bear canisters, full climbing ropes, and that box of backpacking pinot noir — you name it. On the downside, this pack lacks the big, stretchy back pocket that's convenient for stashing layers, water filters, snacks, and the like. The excess straps and webbing are functional but not abundant, so it's more challenging to attach gear to the exterior of your pack. If you require lots of pockets and can fork over a little more cash, the Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL will keep your gear highly organized and might be the pack for you. Another consideration with the Renn 65 is the torso adjusters lock into one of four preset points, preventing you from fine-tuning the fit. Even so, this is a small sacrifice for a lightweight, cozy, roomy, durable, comfortable and budget-friendly pack that accommodates most body shapes and sizes.
Compressive and weather-resistant roll-top closure
REASONS TO AVOID
Rigid hip belts
Not designed for super-hauling
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Weight
2.7 lb
Advertised Volume
55 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio
0.79 oz/L
Volumes Available
55 L
Sizes Available
XS, S, M, adjustable torso
The REI Flash 55 has a smaller capacity than some other leading packs like the Osprey Renn 65, but it makes up for it in numerous ways. With a huge main compartment and movable external pockets and pouches, this is one of our top recommendations for beginner backpackers. Of course, we also recommend the Flash to veteran backpackers, but its user-friendly, customizable design is ideal for adventurers honing in their backpacking routines. It is available in multiple sizes, all of which boast straightforward adjustments to accommodate a variety of body shapes and sizes. The dry bag style closure and removable upper compartment allow the Flash to transition from a 55L-liter backpacking backpack to a large daypack that can hold everything you need for an afternoon at your local park.
Unsurprisingly, the smaller capacity means the Flash is not built to hold as much gear as other packs we tested. It can feel lumpy and unbalanced when loaded to the max, though this can be easily rectified by using external compression features. If you're an adventure seeker who wants to pack all the luxuries comfortably, the Gregory Deva 60 may suit your needs better. Since the Flash lacks some details like the swiveling hip and shoulder mounts of more tech-forward pricey packs, how you pack this bag determines how it feels on your body. When packed and adjusted properly, this pack's frame is supportive, but the suspension is noticeably less burly compared to other models. Also, the hip belts have rigid padding that some users may find too stiff. For adventure seekers who want a lightweight, customizable, and functional do-it-all pack on a budget, we never hesitate to recommend the updated Flash 55.
We don't often recommend taking more than you need into the backcountry, but with this comfortable load-hauler, you can bring almost as many luxuries as you'd like. The Gregory Deva 60 can haul everything you need to camp in deluxe style and luxurious comfort. Boasting one of the thickest hip belts and most robust suspension systems we've ever tested, your back and shoulders will feel fresh, even after many miles on the trail. We love the rugged and easy-access design of the Deva, especially the large U-zip opening that allows you to grab forgotten layers from the bottom of the pack. This pack has room for all your essentials and some well-placed pockets and storage solutions that make maintaining organization a breeze.
All these positive attributes come at a cost: the Deva 60 is one of the heavier packs we tested. If its 4.7 pounds is too heavy, check out the Big Agnes Garnet 60L for a 60-liter pack that weighs a little less. While the hefty suspension system of the Deva makes heavy loads feel lighter, it can feel overbuilt for lighter adventures. The pack's weight never rubbed us the wrong way, but if you are an ultra-light backpacker looking for your new trail BFF, this nearly 5-pound pack might be more than you are interested in. The 2.7-pound ULA Circuit, however, may look a lot more attractive. Nevertheless, the epic suspension, strong stability, and plush padding make the Deva our go-to choice for long days with heavy loads.
The Osprey Aura AG 65 excites us because it has an incredible range of adjustability that easily accommodates many shapes and sizes. Our testers found this pack to be one of the easiest to adjust, even on the go. Even the hottest days are no match for the Aura's uniquely integrated hip belt that seamlessly connects to the back panel and maintains airflow through the whole thing. The steps taken to ensure ventilation on the back panel are noticeable, making this pack our favorite for warm-weather adventures. Even the straps, which boast a tasteful amount of cushioning, didn't bother us as we tested the Aura in a tank top, further securing its standing.
Unfortunately, the Aura lacks stability, which can be uncomfortable when a heavy pack is loaded with gear. The suspension is noticeably overbuilt, which can be more than necessary in certain situations. At 4.5 pounds, the Aura is one of the heavier models we tested, with a poor weight-to-volume ratio. However, if you despise a sweaty back and don't plan on doing too much scrambling or log-hopping, this breezy, highly adjustable pack is one we recommend. If you want a great Osprey pack but don't want to fork over a lot of cash for the Aura, check out the Osprey Renn 65, which is comfortable and affordable.
The Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL is a tall and slender backpack that will make adventurers who like organization super happy. With three access points into the main pocket and the ability to haul heavy loads in relative comfort, you can bring whatever you want into the backcountry — and remember where you packed it. Its split mesh back panel encourages airflow, and its torso adjusters are easy to use and fine-tune; it is helpful that the torso adjustments are anchored along a sliding system, which allows you to set it exactly where you want it. The Aircontact Core prioritizes pockets and pouches so you can stay organized on multi-day excursions.
While the Aircontact Core can haul super heavy loads of gear, the shape of the back isn't suitable for all body types. This backpack is only available in one size, and while it is very adjustable, it is also very tall. Shorter people might find their head movement hindered or feel like the bulk of the weight is riding high. All the extra features come at the cost of higher weight, which is worth noting but not a dealbreaker for a backpack that can lug mountains of gear. If you want to stay organized and bring whatever your heart desires into the backcountry, the Aircontact Core is a great choice for a great price. If you're seeking a more robust range of adjustable features, take a look at the Osprey Aura AG 65.
The Aircontact Core has plenty of space for whatever you want to bring, and tons of organizational features to help you never lose anything while you're out.
Take a bag designed for ultralight users, upgrade the suspension, incorporate durable fabrics, and load it up with spacious pockets, and you have the ULA Circuit. Advertised as “the favorite child” by ULA, we tend to agree. The comfort of this model is impressive for a pack that rides against your back with just a thin layer of foam. The hip belt flexes to accommodate hips of varying angles and the choice of two differently shaped shoulder straps allows both men and women of different builds to get a great fit.
Compared to other bags we tested, the Circuit might not have the most pockets, but it has all the right ones in all the right places, making gear easy to grab or stow away. The cavernous main compartment is easy to load, but our testers lamented the fact that it lacks a sleeping bag compartment with bottom access. If that's a feature you seek, check out other contenders like the Osprey Renn 65. The Circuit's non-ventilated back panel is likely to induce sweating for hot weather pursuits. Yet, with uncommon comfort and thoughtful organization systems, we recommend the Circuit to anyone looking to cut weight without sacrificing organization and durability. At a similar weight, the REI Flash 55 is also worth checking out; just note that its capacity is smaller.
The ULA Circuit offers a great combination of features without all the extra weight, keeping it an ultralight pack.
Credit: Jeffrey Mogavero
Compare Products
While testing backpacking backpacks is serious business, arriving at your camp while the sun is shining is cause for celebration.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
How We Test Women's Backpacking Packs
As always, we conduct thorough market research for every update, scouring manufacturers' websites and backpacking forums. We checked out hundreds of models before purchasing the top options to put through the rigors of our hands-on testing. We identified four key performance areas to focus on: comfort, ease of use, weight, and adjustability. While giving these packs a beating in the snowy Colorado mountains, the harsh desert landscape of the southwestern United States, the muddy, rugged peaks of Vermont, and the sand and scree-laden crags and valleys of coastal California, we paid attention to the tiniest of details, like the ease of adjustability for different users, comfort when fully loaded, and the functionality of the pockets and features. The resulting review is a great starting point if you're looking for a women's backpacking pack. We found packs to suit women of all shapes and sizes while taking special care to assess what type of adventurer would prefer each pack. For more info on our testing processes, see our How We Test article.
Our testing of women's backpacking backpacks is divided into four different metrics:
Comfort (40% of total score weighting)
Ease of Use (25% weighting)
Weight-to-Volume Ratio (20% weighting)
Adjustability (15% weighting)
Our ping-pong ball volume test lets us measure the main compartments and all additional pockets. After stuffing a pack full of balls, we measure the volume in our calibrated cylinder.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Why Trust GearLab
This review is brought to you by a trio of detail-oriented, adventure-savvy GearLab contributors — and the family and friends they round up to backpack with them. This group of adventure-forward ladies includes full-time traveler Elizabeth Paashaus, adventure lover Madison Botzet, and trail connoisseur Ally Arcuri.
Elizabeth travels the country, seeking outdoor adventure with her family, from canyon exploration in the deserts of Utah to thru-hiking Vermont's Long Trail. She has been backpacking for over two decades, including all 2193 miles of the Appalachian Trail, a honeymoon thru-hike of the John Muir Trail, and multi-week excursions in the canyons of Southern Utah.
Madison grew up backpacking and camping in the rugged mountains in Montana every summer. Being raised to love the outdoors, she takes advantage of every weekend she can get to squeeze in a backcountry adventure, either on foot or skis. For the past two summers, she worked with at-risk youth, leading them in whitewater rafting, hiking, and backpacking.
Ally grew up in the Lake Tahoe basin, surrounded by towering mountain peaks. A trail runner through and through, Ally's ideal vacation includes a multi-day excursion with plenty of peaks to bag. Ally has backpacked sections of the Pacific Crest and the John Muir Trails in California, throughout the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, and through the damp rainforests of Costa Rica.
We tested packs in mountain ranges, forests, coastal dunes, and grasslands across the US and more.
Analysis and Test Results
Each pack has been rated and ranked on its comfort when carrying loads, how much it weighs, the functionality of its organizational systems, and its adjustability for varying body sizes and types. Our goal is to help you find the right pack for your specific needs. Keep reading to learn about the super-haulers, comfort queens, and top performers.
In an effort to provide you with the most relevant and up-to-date information as possible, we spent countless nights beneath the stars with some of the best backpacking backpacks for women on the market.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
What's the Best Value?
While we evaluate performance, features, and function during product scoring and ranking, we know that price matters, too. The best-performing products win our top awards, and our best-value awards are granted to products that offer the best balance of performance at a reasonable price. Value is relative, based on your wants and needs, so we endeavor to keep that front and center as we help you suss out which pack will be your new trail companion.
This category has high-performing packs on both ends of the price spectrum. The Osprey Renn 65 offers an incredibly strong performance-to-value ratio, even outperforming some of the most expensive packs. The air mesh suspension backing is supremely comfortable, allowing you to haul up to 65 liters of gear without breaking your back or the bank, creating a high-scoring value for adventure-seekers of all kinds.
The Osprey Renn, right, is one of our favorite packs because of its balance between value and function.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The Gregory Deva offers outstanding comfort and support but is also quite costly. Its relative value is high, but the cost might be too much for some backpackers to swallow. The Deva is also a pack designed with maximalism in mind. If you consider yourself more of a minimalist, both in terms of how you pack and what you like to spend, the value of the Deva might not be worth it to you. Conversely, the REI Flash 55 is a killer pack for a significantly lower price tag. The Flash has removable organizational systems, a durably built body, and a smaller-than-average frame, all of which come together to make this pack one of our go-to recs for backpackers who like to customize their load but are on a budget. Sitting near the middle is the Osprey Eja 58, a sky-scoring pack we adore with a mid-range budget that makes it a great investment.
The Flash is a smaller-than-average backpacking backpack that has movable compartments, making storing quick-access items as easy as can be.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Comfort
We have a lot of demands when it comes to evaluating the comfort of each pack. How comfortable is it when fully loaded? What about when you've eaten most of your food, drank all your water, and aren't carrying as much weight? Does the load sit comfortably on your hips? Does the suspension system allow for air flow behind your back? Are there contact points that lead to discomfort, chafing, or bruising? These are some of the questions we asked while testing each pack's comfort and suspension.
The intended purposes of the models in this review are to carry your food, shelter, and more on your back day in and day out, so the balance between comfort and suspension is essential. Much of a pack's comfort comes from its suspension system and the textiles and padding used to construct its contact points. Fast and light backpackers often have to sacrifice comfort and spaciousness to cover ground more quickly. Meanwhile, the glampers will happily carry more weight to cook a gourmet meal, listen to music, and partake in their favorite beverage while sitting in a comfortable chair. As we mentioned, it is super helpful to sort out what kind of backpacking you will be doing to determine what style of pack will suit you the best.
For backpackers who love carrying extra or heavy gear, we recommend opting for a pack that is equipped with plenty of bungees and webbing. We aren't sure about you, but on our thru-hikes, we find that we end up clipping our sleeping bags, river shoes, water bottles, and sometimes even a pee towel on the outside of our packs.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Standouts in the comfort metric are the Osprey Eja 58, Gregory Deva, the Osprey Aura AG, the Deuter Aircontact Core, and the Osprey Renn. All of these packs are plush, breathable, and comfy models that our testers were excited to wear. All three Osprey packs provide superior ventilation either through ingenious architecture or trampoline back panels, which may also be considered ingenious. Each pack boasts great suspension and comfort while emphasizing other details, creating a unique experience. The ULA Circuit is more comfortable than anticipated for an ultralight pack due to its excellent suspension and padding, which deliver exceptional comfort for loads of all sizes.
The Aircontact Core has plenty of webbing for external compression and a comfortable back panel.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Regarding comfort, we also consider the width and thickness of the shoulder straps. Women with smaller shoulders may find a narrower strap gives them more freedom of movement, while broader-chested women will appreciate the balanced distribution of a wider strap. The Big Agnes Garnet 60L features shoulder straps that taper in significantly. Our narrow-shouldered tester loved how secure this pack felt across the upper body, while our broader-shouldered tester found the taper of the straps to be a bit restrictive. The Flash 55 has a smaller frame than some, making it another great option for backpackers with more petite upper bodies. On the flip side, the Arc'teryx Bora 60 has a large, stiff back panel that suited our larger testers well but felt imposing on our smaller testers.
The Bora 60 is a functional and comfortable pack with a broader overall fit. Though smaller-bodied testers beware - its width might swallow you up. Pictured here on our 5'10" tester.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Some packs have a suspension system with a straight, rigid frame with one or two aluminum stays tied into the hip belt, allowing the weight to transfer down to the hips where you want it. With a hip belt attached to the frame, weight is easily transferred to the hips. Be aware, in this style, if the hip belt doesn't tie closely enough to the frame, the loads can sag onto your shoulders, which can grow uncomfortable quickly. The ULA Circuit and Osprey Ariel 65 are two of our favorite packs with hip belts attached to the frame. Some models, like the Gregory Maven 65L and Deva 60, have an extra curve of padding in the lower back, just above the waist belt. The Bora 60 has an exceptionally prominent lumber pad, which can polarize its comfort. To some, this feature is a welcome help in carrying heavy loads, while to others, it's a jutting lump in the lower back that creates discomfort immediately.
A close-up look at the lumbar pad of the Bora 60. This thick, luscious padding swivels as you move, allowing the pack to feel like an extension of your body (well, as much as a 30-pound pack can feel this way). Some backpackers won't like the thick transition between back panel and supportive padding.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Other packs accomplish this weight distribution using a curved frame design that rests against your shoulder blades and hips while opposing the natural curve of your back in between. The trampoline-style mesh back panels from Osprey on the Eja and Renn allow air to flow between your back and the pack.
The trampoline back panel of the Renn is incredibly comfortable for warm-weather backpacking. This pack lacks the lumbar support of other packs but offers unparalleled breathability and bounce.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The packs that offer the most breathability are preferred for warmer climates and for folks who run hot. The space between the body and the main compartment doesn't compromise stability in well-built packs. Once again, the Osprey packs — the Aura, Renn, and Eja — are standout options when it comes to back panel breathability. Their mesh back panels sit away from the pack, allowing the breeze to flow through. Even in cooler climates, the comfort of the Renn and Eja back panels is hard to ignore. The bounce and pleasant fit of these two well-designed back panels are why they earned near-perfect scores in our comfort metric.
The breathable back panel of the Renn ensures comfort on warm trail days.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
While we don't have any stability concerns regarding packs that secure the weight slightly away from the body, some backpackers prefer the load to be closer to the body. Because of how far the technology behind backpacking backpacks has come, this is all a matter of personal preference. If you like a thick lumbar pad for support, the Arc'teryx Bora and Gregory Deva are great choices. The Bora offers swiveling in the lumbar area and across the shoulder pads, allowing the pack to move as you do. Swivels like this allow your body to move freely but can feel like they will throw you off balance when the load is exceptionally heavy. The Deva is our go-to recommendation when it comes to heavy loads. Rather than featuring swivel technology, it relies on users finding a perfect fit for comfort and stability. With a super-built suspension system, chunky padding, and external compression features, the Deva is a stellar pack for ultimate comfortable load hauling. The Deva is a fantastic option if you want a pack that rides close to your body without turning your back into a sauna.
The Deva has an incredible suspension system and a comfortable frame and handles extra-heavy loads with ease.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Beyond a pack's suspension, shape, and padding, the hip belt and shoulder strap adjustability also significantly contribute to its comfort. Models like the Deva, the Circuit, the Aura, and the Ariel provide thickly padded hip belts that help soften the squeeze. Ultralight contenders like the REI Flash cut down the padding to save weight, and because its users will be carrying lighter loads, the extra padding isn't always a necessity. The Flash, specifically, strikes a great balance of strong lumbar support and rigid padding while maintaining a lightweight. For women with larger hips, models with extendable padding go a long way to add comfort. The Gregory Maven, the Aura, and the Ariel all allow you to extend the hip padding so it wraps farther around wider hips. The Deva has a well-contoured hip belt with velcro-secured, movable padding.
The Gregory Deva 60 comes equipped with thick, well-padded hip belts that have extendable cushions for accommodating wider hips and providing 360-degree comfort.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Ease of Use
Each pack is rated on its ease of use, which includes evaluating the organizational systems it comes equipped with and how easy it is to find your way around the nuances of each pack's nooks and crannies. Some packs come loaded with specified pockets to delineate where each piece of gear should go. Others eliminate pockets for you to develop your own packing system in their pared-down design.
But how helpful is a phone-specific pocket that you can't easily access when you need to peek at the map you downloaded? Some packs have large back pockets with no organizational features, leaving it up to you to decide which items should be stored on the bottom versus the top of the load. Other packs have sleeping bag-specific pockets that many backpackers find crucial because they allow the rest of the load to stay organized within the main body of the pack.
When considering the value of a backpack, it is important to think about what kind of adventuring you will be doing. Going places where bears are a concern? Make sure you snag a pack that can fit a bear can comfortably. Hiking in a warm environment? Opt for a backpack with a springy and breathable back panel.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
First, we'll look at how a pack's organizational systems relate to ease of use. Organization strategies range from minimal, like the Osprey Renn, Granite Gear Blaze 60, and ULA Circuit, to very complex, like the Osprey Ariel 65, Deuter Aircontact Core, and Mountain Hardwear PCT 65. The latter three packs have more than five enclosed compartments and additional open pockets for easily accessing items like your smartphone, rain jacket, or favorite binoculars.
Shown here on the PCT is one of the biggest outer pockets we've ever seen on a backpack. Easily big enough to fit camp shoes, an extra layer, and more.
Credit: Jeffrey Mogavero
The REI Traverse includes not one but two water bottle holsters that are easy to use. It also has a removable brain that transforms into a handy daypack with only a few clips. The REI Flash comes equipped with movable pockets, including one specifically made to fit a phone, and adheres to the sternum strap. The Deva has a special little loop for stashing your sunglasses within reach. Most of the packs we tested have specified loops and bungees for stashing trekking poles. Many of those, like the Arc'teryx Bora 60 and Big Agnes Garnet 60L, feature these loops on the back of the pack. While they are easy to grab when needed, stowing requires removing the pack or asking a friend to help get them back into their loops.
Some packs come with specified design features to accommodate popular backpacking items like trekking poles.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Much like our favorite running-centric hydration packs, external bungees and loops can drastically change how easy each pack is to use. Attaching items to the exterior of a pack is easy and helps keep items you want more accessible within arm's reach. One aspect we love most about the Deva is it includes adjustable straps at the base of the pack to carry your sleeping bag or tent. Many of our testers prefer this to an enclosed pocket, but some other backpackers prefer the compartment. Inside or outside, this organizational component is hugely helpful because it frees up prime real estate inside the pack while allowing you to transport some of the most necessary backpacking items securely. Knowing where your gear is stashed can make or break your experience when you arrive at your camp.
The secure lower straps of the Deva make it great for backpackers who want to stash larger items on the outside, while utilizing the pack's full 60-liter capacity on the inside.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Beyond just being able to attach gear to the outside of the pack, external bungees and straps can act as an additional compression system, securing the load closer to the supportive frame of the back and your body. A great example of this is the Garnet. This pack uses adjustable Z-straps bilaterally to tamp down the load securely. We have found that the ability to compress our packs externally is helpful, especially when the packs have more advanced organizational systems. The Osprey Eja 58 also uses zigzagging straps for external compression, allowing the back to move with your body and balance instead of against it. We often notice that utilizing specific compartments can create a lopsided load, especially if you are toting a bear can. You can stay organized and explore more comfortably by having externally adhered straps and bungees to secure your gear. Another way to secure your load is with a roll-top, dry bag-like closure, just like the Flash 55 and ULA Circuit employ.
The external Z-strap of the Garnet 60L helps secure lopsided loads for a comfortable trail experience.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The level of organization you desire ultimately comes down to your personal preference and developing systems that work with the pack you have. Packs that offer U-zip or lateral zippers for access to the main compartment can be key when you forget to leave your rain jacket at the top of your pack to grab easily when the skies open up. The U-zip feature of the Deuter Aircontact Core is impressively easy to use. On the other hand, those extra zippers and fabric hems add weight to your pack. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the Granite Gear Blaze 60 and the ULA Circuit are great examples of how more minimalistic packs with fewer pockets can be easy to use.
A peek into the main body of the Aircontact Core via its U-zip access point.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Another system that we paid critical attention to when testing these packs is the hydration system. Most models include side pockets for water bottles and are compatible with a hydration bladder. We typically use both systems when we head out into the backcountry.
Though not the most organizational-forward system, the hydration bladder tab within the Garnet makes it super easy to attach your hydration bladder.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Drinking water is incredibly important when you are out scaling peaks and working up a sweat, especially when backpacking at altitude. Therefore, it is paramount to have easy access to your water, either via a hose that is snaked through the top of the pack and down the shoulder strap or via a bottle stashed in a side pocket — or both.
Consider what hydration systems you want to use when choosing your pack. Not all water bottle pockets are comfortable with all water bottles and the same can be said for hydration sleeve and bladder compatibility.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Functional side pockets are crucial for hydrating on the go. The side pockets made of stretchy mesh make it easier to get Nalgene water bottles in and out on the trailside. We favor packs with these easy-access pockets on both sides instead of only one side. Some side pockets are made of inflexible ripstop material, which tends to be more durable but less secure and can dump your belongings when you lean forward. Packs with forward-tilted side pockets make grabbing your water bottle easier, but can also place tall water bottles in the way of your elbows as you walk. When choosing your backpack, it's important to consider what types of hydration vessels you already have or are planning to get for your backpacking adventures.
The mesh side pockets on both sides of the Flash are great for accommodating different-sized water bottles. Notice how the pocket is slightly slanted forward - this makes a huge difference when trying to reach your water bottle on the trail.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Weight-to-Volume Ratio
It may seem as though the lighter the pack, the better the function, but this is not always the case. Due to the nuance that exists, we created our volume-to-weight ratio testing. This test provides numerical values that back up our findings, but keep in mind that a slightly heavier pack with stronger suspension might be best for you, as many weight-heavy features are what satisfy personal preferences.
We added to our analysis the functionality of each model as we explored the trade-offs between lighter and heavier packs. We considered whether a heavier pack may be worth it for exceptional features and functionality or greater durability, and we considered whether a lighter pack will still provide the comfort, adjustability, and longevity you need for many years of enjoying the backcountry.
Some packs weigh more than others. If you are seeking a lightweight pack, it is worth thinking through which features you are willing to sacrifice.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
First, we weighed each pack and took notes. All the backpacks in our lineup weigh between 2.7 and 4.9 pounds and range from 55 to 70 liters of carrying capacity. We wanted to see which packs best handled light, moderate, and heavy loads. We painstakingly tested each pack with a 10-pound, 19-pound, and 33-pound load, taking notes on our phones as we huffed and puffed along sprawling trail systems.
Some packs felt wobbly and unstable when loaded with a scant amount of gear, while others felt more comfortable when minimally loaded. Certain suspension systems gave the illusion of buckling beneath 30+ pounds when we added our luxury backpacking items. Others took on even more weight with relative ease — like the Osprey Aura AG and the super-hauling Gregory Deva.
Our base weight is 19 pounds of gear. Of course, that number can quickly climb once more water, snacks, layers, and fun extras are added.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
While we love some of the impressively light models, some sacrifice comfortable extras and trim favorite features to achieve their low weights. For example, the Granite Gear Blaze 60 weighs just 3 pounds with a 60-liter capacity, giving it an excellent weight-to-volume ratio. And while our male testers love this pack, our female testers found that it struggled to comfortably accommodate taller ladies, and its lack of ventilation as a result of its tent-like textile left many a sweaty back.
The Blaze offers a fantastically low weight, but isn't quite as ergonomically comfortable on tall women.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The REI Flash is a great example of a back with a back-to-basics style. It offers comfort but without an overbuilt frame. The result is a smaller-feeling backpack that is great for shorter trips or adventurers looking to explore without bringing the kitchen sink. The Flash weighs just 2.7 pounds when all its optional features are attached to the pack. Removing these extras (like the pocket specifically for a phone and the hip belt pockets) makes it possible to drop that pack weight to just 2 pounds.
The REI Flash 55 has quite a few removable pouches. An already lightweight pack, the Flash can get down to 2 pounds when its accessories are removed.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Also weighing in at the 2.7-pound mark is one of our all-around favorite packs, the Osprey Eja. The Eja offers slightly more padding, ventilation, and overall comfort than the Flash, but both packs are as trail-ready as you are. The more massive packs often provide more support and comfort, so we refuse to recommend lightweight packs for all outright. If you like bringing heavy or copious amounts of gear, the additional support of a well-built pack is worth its added weight. The Gregory Deva and Osprey Ariel weigh 4.7 and 4.8 pounds, respectively. Both have strong support systems and burly frames. Their additional architecture and deliberate suspension systems allow heavy loads to be carried comfortably.
The fact that the Deva can stand upright on its own while stuffed with gear gives you an idea of how supportive its frame and overall structure are. That structure comes with extra weight and extra comfort, so consider your style of backpacking before assuming that a lightweight pack is “best”.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Many heavier packs come with more compartments and special features for organization. If you know you struggle to keep your gear straight while on the trail, adding extra weight for specified compartments is a great idea. On the flip side, if you are motivated by an ultralight trail life and are happy to tote your goods in more of a haul bag style pack, these extra pockets and straps may be just extra pounds and ounces for you.
The body of the Flash is spacious and open, allowing you to create your own organizational system. Specified organization features are detachable and can be toted on the exterior of the pack.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
The ULA Circuit borders on being an ultralight pack, weighing 2.7 pounds. (If you're interested in going ultralight, see our best ultralight backpack review.) With a 68-liter capacity, it is a gear-hauling beast. It has a sturdy and close-fitting frame that remains reasonably supportive, even beneath heavy loads. The Circuit offers fewer organizational and customizable features but can haul massive amounts of gear, giving it one of the best weight-to-volume ratios in our lineup.
The ULA Circuit has a streamlined design that is reasonably comfortable and simple to use. You won't get a breeze to mitigate your back sweat, but the sturdy and close-fitting frame, combined with the light 2.7-pound pack weight, make this a capable load hauler.
Credit: Madison Botzet
Adjustability
Getting a pack fit to your unique build and packing style is critical when wearing your house on your back, especially for days on end. Most backpacking packs for women come in multiple sizes, just like clothing. However, many offer additional adjustment options that allow you to tailor the fit more specifically to your precise size and shape. We pulled in as many friends as possible to help test the full range of sizes for each pack in our lineup. Every pack's sizing adjustments were tested on women of diverse heights, builds, shapes, and sizes. We found that some packs are easy to adjust on the go if they don't feel quite right, while others take more time and effort. Packs that scored well in this category allowed for a full range of adjustments.
The Osprey Aura AG and Ariel scored highly in this metric since they offer different compression adjustments and are easy to adjust on the fly. The Deva is a size-inclusive pack but requires plenty of muscle and extra time to adjust fully — some of that velcro is tough! The Bora offers a large spread of sizes along the back panel and shoulder straps, but its overall width is less suitable for small backpackers. We found packs with wide back panels to be less comfortable on smaller testers, while packs with smaller back panels could accommodate a wider variety of shapes.
The sliding torso adjustment on the Aura AG is one of the easiest to change and is more stable than most, as it's attached to the back panel on both sides rather than just in the center.
Credit: Jeffrey Mogavero
During testing, we found the Big Agnes Garnet takes more effort to adjust, but its multiple height options ensure a near-perfect fit on a range of body sizes. The REI Flash is easy to adjust on the go and suits smaller-body types well because of its unimposing frame. The Deuter Aircontact Core adjusts via sliding mechanisms that allow for fine-tuning the size, which can help you pinpoint your fit. The Osprey Renn and Eja have the same length adjustment mechanism that makes it easy to switch between five different heights on the side of the trail as your load changes throughout the duration of your trip.
With a less intrusive frame and organizational options galore, we think that the do-it-all REI Flash 55 is a great pack for beginners who aren't sure what kind of backpacking lies ahead.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Those with curvier hips will appreciate models with extra waist belt adjustability in extendable padding, such as the Gregory Maven, Osprey Aura AG, and Osprey Ariel. Another bump in adjustability went to the Aura and Ariel because they both have extendable shoulder straps that are great for bigger-chested ladies to ensure that the straps fit properly without rubbing.
Peeling back the top layer of the Osprey Ariel's shoulder strap reveals a velcro pad that can slide out an additional four inches for a great combination of adjustability and comfort.
Credit: Elizabeth Paashaus
It is standard for packs to have adjustable shoulder straps and sternum straps that slide vertically up and down sternum rails. On female-specific packs, the shoulder straps are typically tapered toward the centerline. While we cannot speak for all women, this tapering, combined with multiple adjustment points, is generally very accommodating. As always, we recommend trying packs on before making the purchase, but we remain satisfied with the inclusivity of most of the women's backpacking backpacks we tested.
Backpacking backpacks can cost a lot. We hiked hundreds of miles in a diversity of climates, seasons, and environments to figure out which packs might suit you and which might be better for other hikers.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Why Buy a Women's Pack?
We tested packs designed specifically for a woman's body shape or that offer interchangeable components to get the right fit for women. Many brands, like Osprey, Granite Gear, and Gregory, offer a men's version of the same pack. The most significant differences between men's backpacking packs and women's packs are the shape of hip belts and shoulder straps.
Female-specific packs typically feature well-padded and wider hip belts, as well as contoured shoulder straps.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Women's backpacks are designed to fit the “average” female torso better. The shoulder straps and back panels are narrower, which leads to better biomechanics when hauling loads of gear up a mountainside. The hip belts of female-specific packs are typically curved or molded for curvier bodies, and the adjustment options are often within a smaller size range for women. When combined with the expertly designed suspension, this hip belt style allows the pack's weight to rest predominately on the hips as it should.
While packs built for women are great choices for most women, smaller-statured people in general can benefit from packs that are built to serve smaller frames.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Recently, our testers have noticed slight differences in how loads are carried between packs. Since women typically have lower centers of gravity than men, these minute differences can spell major differences in comfort when packs are loaded to the gills. women's specific designs will sometimes optimize load carrying with a lower, wider bag. By holding the bulk of the weight closer to our centers of gravity, we can feel more steady and stable on the trail. These fit and sizing changes often make a women's specific model more comfortable and better fitting than a men's or unisex model.
Packs with external compression systems, like the Eja, can help heavy loads sit comfortably on your back.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
Most women will find a women's specific pack to offer a better fit, but just because you identify as a woman and the pack says “women” doesn't mean it will be the right fit for you. Women with larger frames and broader shoulders may find men's models to fit them better, and men with narrower shoulders or curvier builds may find a more comfortable fit from a woman's pack. With any pack, it is worth spending the time to get the correct size and shape for your body. When it comes to backpacking, one size does not fit all. See our How to Choose a Women's Backpacking Backpack article to determine what you're looking for before taking to your local gear shop.
Conclusion
The right pack will determine whether you enjoy your outdoor experience or suffer annoyance and discomfort. However, choosing the right pack can be difficult. Consider your priorities for packing and your intended environments and seasons. Have an expert measure your torso length to recommend the right-sized pack, then try on your options before purchasing — or make sure the website you're buying from has a good return policy if the pack doesn't fit how you'd hoped. We hope that our hands-on, extensive testing has provided helpful insight into your search through the expansive world of women's backpacking packs.
—
Ally Arcuri, Madison Botzet, and Elizabeth Paashaus
