The 7 Best Backpacking Backpacks for Women

Best Overall Backpacking Backpack for Women

Osprey Eja 58

The Osprey Eja 58 takes all of Osprey's tried-and-true qualities and combines them into one comfortable and affordable backpacking backpack for women. This pack has a trampoline back panel, which excels at providing comfort and breathability on long treks. Our lead tester remarked, “I love the breezy back panel that allowed air to flow freely as I worked up a sweat.” In addition, the Eja adjusts up to four inches via an easy-to-use slider on its back panel, making it an option to update your fit on the go — even when your pack is full.

Measured Weight i	2.7 lb
Advertised Volume i	55 - 58 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	0.79 oz/L
Volumes Available	38, 48, 58 L
Sizes Available	XS/S, M/L, adjustable torso

This pack includes many thoughtful elements, making it a fantastic backpacking pack for adventure enthusiasts who want a long-lasting pack suitable for all occasions. The removable brain boasts one of the largest and easiest-to-access capacities we've seen, and when removed, an integrated flap can be secured over the opening of the pack for security. The external compression system that zigzags its way down each side takes a bit of getting used to, but once you dial in your gear and tighten the straps, even heavy loads can be toted with ease.

Our gripes about the Osprey Eja 58 are minimal. First, we found the hip belt pockets are not big enough. Call us high-maintenance, but we like having our phones, maps, lip balms, headlamps, snacks, and more within arm's reach. The limited hip belt pocket space simply cannot accommodate everything we want to keep handy. (If you want spacious hip belt pockets, take a look at the Gregory Deva 60 — we were able to cram quite a lot of stuff into its pockets.) Second, the Eja's less robust hip belt might be uncomfortable on some bodies. However, our testers found that the Eja's hip belt was more flexible than others, which led to extended comfort. Lastly, the Eja does not include many external straps, but the ones it does are well-placed and functional. If you truly need an ultralight pack, the ULA Circuit has an even better weight-to-volume ratio. But if you want a semi-minimalistic pack that can provide long-lasting comfort and breathability without totally breaking the bank, the Eja is our top pick.

Read more: Osprey Eja 58 review

Best Bang for Your Buck

Osprey Renn 65

If you're searching for a full-sized backpack that performs well without spending a fortune, the Osprey Renn 65 is a great pick. Our tests showed this is a super comfortable pack with a large capacity that offers a great balance of simplicity and organizational features. The Renn's unique design spreads the 65-liter load laterally, allowing heavy loads to ride comfortably on your hips, while the mesh suspension does much of the heavy lifting. The simple and user-friendly design makes this pack a great option for anyone looking to take an uncomplicated approach to backpacking. The hip and brain pockets are spacious, and a rain cover comes with your purchase. Despite being one of the lowest-priced options we tested, this pack still boasts the comfortable award-winning Osprey suspension many outdoor enthusiasts love. The Renn 65 is a good choice for its unique, comfortable design and advantageous extra features. “Even as a budget pack, I think the Renn will appease veteran and novice backpackers alike,” one tester stated. We wholeheartedly recommend this pack for most backpackers due to its simplicity and comfort.

Measured Weight i	3.6 lb
Advertised Volume i	65 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	0.89 oz/L
Volumes Available	50, 65 L
Sizes Available	One size, extended fit one size; adjustable torso

The roomy main compartment of the Renn 65 can fit almost anything, including a bear canister, full climbing ropes, and that box of backpacking pinot noir — you name it. However, this pack does not have a big, stretchy back pocket that's convenient for stashing layers, water filters, snacks, and the like. The excess straps and webbing are functional but not abundant, so it's harder to attach gear to the outside of this pack. If you prefer plenty of pockets and can afford to spend a little more, the Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL will keep your gear highly organized. Another consideration with the Renn 65 is the torso adjusters lock into one of four preset points, preventing you from fine-tuning the fit. Still, this is a small sacrifice for a lightweight, cozy, roomy, durable, comfortable and budget-friendly pack that accommodates most body shapes and sizes.

Read more: Osprey Renn 65 review

Most Versatile Women's Backpacking Pack

REI Co-op Flash 55 - Women's

The REI Flash 55 has a smaller capacity than some other leading packs like the Osprey Renn 65, but it makes up for it in numerous ways. With a huge main compartment and movable external pockets and pouches, this is one of our top recommendations for beginner backpackers. Of course, we also recommend the Flash to veteran backpackers, but its user-friendly, customizable design is ideal for adventurers honing their backpacking routines. It is available in multiple sizes, all of which boast straightforward adjustments to accommodate a variety of body shapes and sizes. The dry bag style closure and removable upper compartment allow the Flash to transition from a 55L backpacking backpack to a large daypack that can hold everything you need for an afternoon at your local park.

Measured Weight i	2.7 lb
Advertised Volume i	55 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	0.79 oz/L
Volumes Available	55 L
Sizes Available	XS, S, M, adjustable torso

Unsurprisingly, the smaller capacity means the Flash is not designed to hold as much gear as other options we tested. One reviewer stated, “I found it can feel lumpy and unbalanced when packed to the max.” That said, you can easily rectify this issue by using external compression features. If you're looking to pack all the luxuries comfortably, the Gregory Deva 60 may be a more suitable fit. Since the Flash lacks some details like the swiveling hip and shoulder mounts of more tech-forward pricey packs, how you pack this bag determines how it feels on your body. When packed and adjusted properly, the Flash's frame is supportive, but the suspension is noticeably less burly than other packs we tested. Also, the hip belts have rigid padding that some users might find too stiff. For adventure seekers wanting a lightweight, customizable, and functional do-it-all pack on a budget, we never hesitate to recommend the updated Flash 55.

Read more: REI Flash 55 review

Best Pack for Super-Hauling in Comfort

Gregory Deva 60

We don't often recommend taking more than you need into the backcountry, but with this comfortable load-hauler, you can bring almost as many luxuries as you'd like. The Gregory Deva 60 can haul everything you need to camp in deluxe style and comfort. Boasting one of the thickest hip belts and most robust suspension systems we've ever tested, your back and shoulders will feel fresh, even after many miles on the trail. We love the rugged and easy-access design of the Deva, especially the large U-zip opening that allows you to grab forgotten layers from the bottom of the pack. This pack has room for all your essentials and some well-placed pockets and storage solutions that make maintaining organization a breeze.

Measured Weight i	4.7 lb
Advertised Volume i	60 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	1.25 oz/L
Volumes Available	60, 70 L
Sizes Available	XS, S, M, adjustable torso

All these positive attributes come at a cost: the Deva 60 is one of the heavier packs we tested. If its 4.7 pounds is too heavy, check out the Big Agnes Garnet 60L for a 60-liter pack that weighs a little less. While the hefty suspension system of the Deva makes heavy loads feel lighter, it can feel overbuilt for lighter adventures. The pack's weight never rubbed us the wrong way, but if you are an ultra-light backpacker looking for your new trail BFF, this nearly 5-pound pack might be more than you are interested in. The 2.7-pound ULA Circuit, however, may look a lot more attractive. Nevertheless, the epic suspension, strong stability, and plush padding make the Deva our go-to choice for long days with heavy loads.

Read more: Gregory Deva 60 review

Best Ventilation and Adjustability

Osprey Aura AG 65

The Osprey Aura AG 65 excites us because it has an incredible range of adjustability that easily accommodates many shapes and sizes. Our lead tester said, “I found it was one of the easiest packs to adjust, even on the go.” Even the hottest days are no match for the Aura's uniquely integrated hip belt that seamlessly connects to the back panel and maintains airflow through the whole thing. The steps taken to ensure ventilation on the back panel are noticeable, making this pack our favorite for warm-weather adventures. Even the straps, which boast a tasteful amount of cushioning, didn't bother us as we tested the Aura in a tank top, further securing its standing.

Measured Weight i	4.5 lb
Advertised Volume i	65 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	1.11 oz/L
Volumes Available	50, 65 L
Sizes Available	XS/S, M/L, adjustable torso

Unfortunately, the Aura lacks stability, which can be uncomfortable when a heavy pack is loaded with gear. The suspension is noticeably overbuilt, which can be more than necessary in certain situations. At 4.5 pounds, the Aura is one of the heavier models we tested, with a poor weight-to-volume ratio. However, if you despise a sweaty back and don't plan on doing too much scrambling or log-hopping, this breezy, highly adjustable pack is one we recommend. If you want a great Osprey pack but don't want to fork over a lot of cash for the Aura, check out the Osprey Renn 65, which is comfortable and affordable.

Read more: Osprey Aura AG 65 review

Best Organizational Systems

Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL - Women's

The Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL is a tall and slender backpack that will make adventurers who like organization super happy. With three access points into the main pocket and the ability to haul heavy loads in relative comfort, you can bring whatever you want into the backcountry — and remember where you packed it. Its split mesh back panel encourages airflow, and its torso adjusters are easy to use and fine-tune; it is helpful that the torso adjustments are anchored along a sliding system, which allows you to set it exactly where you want it. The Aircontact Core prioritizes pockets and pouches so you can stay organized on multi-day excursions.

Measured Weight i	4.9 lb
Advertised Volume i	60 + 10 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	1.12 oz/L
Volumes Available	45+10, 60+10 L
Sizes Available	One size, adjustable torso

While the Aircontact Core can haul super heavy loads of gear, the shape of the back isn't suitable for all body types. This backpack is only available in one size, and while it is very adjustable, it is also very tall. Shorter people might find their head movement hindered or feel like the bulk of the weight is riding high. All the extra features come at the cost of higher weight, which is worth noting but not a dealbreaker for a backpack that can lug mountains of gear. If you want to stay organized and bring whatever your heart desires into the backcountry, the Aircontact Core is a great choice for a great price. If you're seeking a more robust range of adjustable features, take a look at the Osprey Aura AG 65.

Read more: Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL review

Best Ultralight Thru-Hike Inspired Backpack

Ultralight Adventure Equipment Circuit

Take a bag designed for ultralight users, upgrade the suspension, incorporate durable fabrics, and load it up with spacious pockets, and you have the ULA Circuit. Advertised as “the favorite child” by ULA, we tend to agree. The comfort of this model is impressive for a pack that rides against your back with just a thin layer of foam. The hip belt flexes to accommodate hips of varying angles and the choice of two differently shaped shoulder straps allows both men and women of different builds to get a great fit.

Measured Weight i	2.7 lb
Advertised Volume i	68 L
Overall Weight-to-Volume Ratio i	0.64 oz/L
Volumes Available	68 L
Sizes Available	S, M, L, XL, Kids

The Circuit may not sport the most pockets of the models we tested, but it has all the right ones in all the right places, making gear easy to grab or stow away. The cavernous main compartment is easy to load, but our testers lamented the fact that it does not offer a sleeping bag compartment with bottom access. If that's a feature you desire, consider other models like the Osprey Renn 65. The Circuit's non-ventilated back panel will probably induce sweating for hot weather pursuits. Yet, with uncommon comfort and thoughtful organization systems, we recommend this pack to those wanting to cut weight without sacrificing organization and durability. At a similar weight, the REI Flash 55 is also worth checking out; just note that its capacity is smaller.

Read more: Ultralight Adventure Equipment Circuit review

Compare Products

Compare select up to 5 products to compare

	Score	Product	Price
	86	Osprey Eja 58 Best Overall Backpacking Backpack for Women	$260
	83	Osprey Renn 65 Best Bang for Your Buck	$190
	74	REI Co-op Flash 55 - Women's Most Versatile Women's Backpacking Pack	$199
	73	Gregory Deva 60 Best Pack for Super-Hauling in Comfort	$330
	72	Osprey Aura AG 65 Best Ventilation and Adjustability	$340
	71	Big Agnes Garnet 60L - Women's	$250
	70	Deuter Aircontact Core 60+10 SL - Women's Best Organizational Systems	$260
	68	Granite Gear Blaze 60 - Women's	$300
	66	Ultralight Adventure Equipment Circuit Best Ultralight Thru-Hike Inspired Backpack	$300
	66	Gregory Maven 65L	$280
	59	Osprey Ariel 65	$320
	47	REI Co-op Traverse 60 - Women's	$259

How We Tested

As always, we conduct thorough market research for every update, scouring manufacturers' websites and backpacking forums. We checked out hundreds of models before purchasing the top options to put through the rigors of our hands-on testing. We identified four key performance areas to focus on: comfort, ease of use, weight, and adjustability. While giving these packs a beating in the snowy Colorado mountains, the harsh desert landscape of the southwestern United States, the muddy, rugged peaks of Vermont, and the sand and scree-laden crags and valleys of coastal California, we paid attention to the tiniest of details, like the ease of adjustability for different users, comfort when fully loaded, and the functionality of the pockets and features. The resulting review is a great starting point if you're looking for a women's backpacking pack. We found packs to suit women of all shapes and sizes while taking special care to assess what type of adventurer would prefer each pack. For more info on our testing processes, see our How We Test article.

Our testing of women's backpacking backpacks is divided into four different metrics:

• Comfort (40% of total score weighting)

• Ease of Use (25% weighting)

• Weight-to-Volume Ratio (20% weighting)

• Adjustability (15% weighting)

Why Trust GearLab

This review is brought to you by a trio of detail-oriented, adventure-savvy GearLab contributors — and the family and friends they round up to backpack with them. This group of adventure-forward ladies includes full-time traveler Elizabeth Paashaus, adventure lover Madison Botzet, and trail connoisseur Ally Arcuri.

Elizabeth travels the country, seeking outdoor adventure with her family, from canyon exploration in the deserts of Utah to thru-hiking Vermont's Long Trail. She has been backpacking for over two decades, including all 2193 miles of the Appalachian Trail, a honeymoon thru-hike of the John Muir Trail, and multi-week excursions in the canyons of Southern Utah.

Madison grew up backpacking and camping in the rugged mountains in Montana every summer. Being raised to love the outdoors, she takes advantage of every weekend she can get to squeeze in a backcountry adventure, either on foot or skis. For the past two summers, she worked with at-risk youth, leading them in whitewater rafting, hiking, and backpacking.

Ally grew up in the Lake Tahoe basin, surrounded by towering mountain peaks. A trail runner through and through, Ally's ideal vacation includes a multi-day excursion with plenty of peaks to bag. Ally has backpacked sections of the Pacific Crest and the John Muir Trails in California, throughout the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, and through the damp rainforests of Costa Rica.

Analysis and Test Results

Each pack has been rated and ranked on its comfort when carrying loads, how much it weighs, the functionality of its organizational systems, and its adjustability for varying body sizes and types. Our goal is to help you find the right pack for your specific needs. Keep reading to learn about the super-haulers, comfort queens, and top performers.

What's the Best Value?

While we evaluate performance, features, and function during product scoring and ranking, we know that price matters, too. The best-performing products win our top awards, and our best-value awards are granted to products that offer the best balance of performance at a reasonable price. Value is relative, based on your wants and needs, so we endeavor to keep that front and center as we help you suss out which pack will be your new trail companion.

This category has high-performing packs on both ends of the price spectrum. The Osprey Renn 65 offers an incredibly strong performance-to-value ratio, even outperforming some of the most expensive packs. The air mesh suspension backing is supremely comfortable, allowing you to haul up to 65 liters of gear without breaking your back or the bank, creating a high-scoring value for adventure-seekers of all kinds.

The Gregory Deva offers outstanding comfort and support but is also quite costly. Its relative value is high, but the cost might be too much for some backpackers to swallow. The Deva is also a pack designed with maximalism in mind. If you consider yourself more of a minimalist, both in terms of how you pack and what you like to spend, the value of the Deva might not be worth it to you. Conversely, the REI Flash 55 is a killer pack for a significantly lower price tag. The Flash has removable organizational systems, a durably built body, and a smaller-than-average frame, all of which come together to make this pack one of our go-to recs for backpackers who like to customize their load but are on a budget. Sitting near the middle is the Osprey Eja 58, a sky-scoring pack we adore with a mid-range budget that makes it a great investment.

Comfort

We have a lot of demands when it comes to evaluating the comfort of each pack. How comfortable is it when fully loaded? What about when you've eaten most of your food, drank all your water, and aren't carrying as much weight? Does the load sit comfortably on your hips? Does the suspension system allow for air flow behind your back? Are there contact points that lead to discomfort, chafing, or bruising? These are some of the questions we asked while testing each pack's comfort and suspension.

The intended purposes of the models in this review are to carry your food, shelter, and more on your back day in and day out, so the balance between comfort and suspension is essential. Much of a pack's comfort comes from its suspension system and the textiles and padding used to construct its contact points. Fast and light backpackers often have to sacrifice comfort and spaciousness to cover ground more quickly. Meanwhile, the glampers will happily carry more weight to cook a gourmet meal, listen to music, and partake in their favorite beverage while sitting in a comfortable chair. As we mentioned, it is super helpful to sort out what kind of backpacking you will be doing to determine what style of pack will suit you the best.

Standouts in the comfort metric are the Osprey Eja 58, Gregory Deva, the Osprey Aura AG, the Deuter Aircontact Core, and the Osprey Renn. All of these packs are plush, breathable, and comfy models that our testers were excited to wear. All three Osprey packs provide superior ventilation either through ingenious architecture or trampoline back panels, which may also be considered ingenious. Each pack boasts great suspension and comfort while emphasizing other details, creating a unique experience. The ULA Circuit is more comfortable than anticipated for an ultralight pack due to its excellent suspension and padding, which deliver exceptional comfort for loads of all sizes.

Regarding comfort, we also consider the width and thickness of the shoulder straps. Women with smaller shoulders may find a narrower strap gives them more freedom of movement, while broader-chested women will appreciate the balanced distribution of a wider strap. The Big Agnes Garnet 60L features shoulder straps that taper in significantly. Our narrow-shouldered tester loved how secure this pack felt across the upper body, while our broader-shouldered tester found the taper of the straps to be a bit restrictive. The Flash 55 has a smaller frame than some, making it another great option for backpackers with more petite upper bodies.

Some packs have a suspension system with a straight, rigid frame with one or two aluminum stays tied into the hip belt, allowing the weight to transfer down to the hips where you want it. With a hip belt attached to the frame, weight is easily transferred to the hips. Be aware that in this style, if the hip belt doesn't tie closely enough to the frame, the loads can sag onto your shoulders, which can grow uncomfortable quickly. The ULA Circuit and Osprey Ariel 65 are two of our favorite packs with hip belts attached to the frame. Some models, like the Gregory Maven 65L and Deva 60, have an extra curve of padding in the lower back, just above the waist belt. Some folks find prominent lumber pads to hinder comfort. You'll likely want to try a pack on to determine whether this feature is a welcome help in carrying heavy loads or just a jutting lump in the lower back that creates immediate discomfort.

Other packs accomplish this weight distribution using a curved frame design that rests against your shoulder blades and hips while opposing the natural curve of your back in between. The trampoline-style mesh back panels from Osprey on the Eja and Renn allow air to flow between your back and the pack.

The packs that offer the most breathability are preferred for warmer climates and for folks who run hot. The space between the body and the main compartment doesn't compromise stability in well-built packs. Once again, the Osprey packs — the Aura, Renn, and Eja — are standout options when it comes to back panel breathability. Their mesh back panels sit away from the pack, allowing the breeze to flow through. Even in cooler climates, the comfort of the Renn and Eja back panels is hard to ignore. The bounce and pleasant fit of these two well-designed back panels are why they earned near-perfect scores in our comfort metric.

While we don't have any stability concerns regarding packs that secure the weight slightly away from the body, some backpackers prefer the load to be closer to the body. Because of how far the technology behind backpacking packs has come, this is all a matter of personal preference. If you like a thick lumbar pad for support, Gregory Deva is a great choice. It's our go-to recommendation when it comes to heavy loads. Rather than featuring swivel technology, it relies on users finding a perfect fit for comfort and stability. With a super-built suspension system, chunky padding, and external compression features, the Deva is a stellar pack for ultimate comfortable load hauling. It's a fantastic option if you want a pack that rides close to your body without turning your back into a sauna.

Beyond a pack's suspension, shape, and padding, the hip belt and shoulder strap adjustability also significantly contribute to its comfort. Models like the Deva, the Circuit, the Aura, and the Ariel provide thickly padded hip belts that help soften the squeeze. Ultralight contenders like the REI Flash cut down the padding to save weight, and because its users will be carrying lighter loads, the extra padding isn't always a necessity. The Flash, specifically, strikes a great balance of strong lumbar support and rigid padding while maintaining a lightweight. For women with larger hips, models with extendable padding go a long way to add comfort. The Gregory Maven, the Aura, and the Ariel all allow you to extend the hip padding so it wraps farther around wider hips. The Deva has a well-contoured hip belt with velcro-secured, movable padding.

Ease of Use

Each pack is rated on its ease of use, which includes evaluating the organizational systems it comes equipped with and how easy it is to find your way around the nuances of each pack's nooks and crannies. Some packs come loaded with specified pockets to delineate where each piece of gear should go. Others eliminate pockets for you to develop your own packing system in their pared-down design.

But how helpful is a phone-specific pocket that you can't easily access when you need to peek at the map you downloaded? Some packs have large back pockets with no organizational features, leaving it up to you to decide which items should be stored on the bottom versus the top of the load. Other packs have sleeping bag-specific pockets that many backpackers find crucial because they allow the rest of the load to stay organized within the main body of the pack.

First, we'll look at how a pack's organizational systems relate to ease of use. Organization strategies range from minimal, like the Osprey Renn, Granite Gear Blaze 60, and ULA Circuit, to very complex, like the Osprey Ariel 65, and Deuter Aircontact Core. The latter two packs have more than five enclosed compartments and additional open pockets for easily accessing items like your smartphone, rain jacket, or a pair of binoculars.

The REI Traverse includes not one but two water bottle holsters that are easy to use. It also has a removable brain that transforms into a handy daypack with only a few clips. The REI Flash comes equipped with movable pockets, including one specifically made to fit a phone, and adheres to the sternum strap. The Deva has a special little loop for stashing your sunglasses within reach. Most of the packs we tested have specified loops and bungees for stashing trekking poles. Many of those, like the Big Agnes Garnet 60L, feature these loops on the back of the pack. While they are easy to grab when needed, stowing requires removing the pack or asking a friend to help get them back into their loops.

Much like our favorite running-centric hydration packs, external bungees and loops can drastically change how easy each pack is to use. Attaching items to the exterior of a pack is easy and helps keep items you want more accessible within arm's reach. One aspect we love most about the Deva is it includes adjustable straps at the base of the pack to carry your sleeping bag or tent. Many of our testers prefer this to an enclosed pocket, but some other backpackers prefer the compartment. Inside or outside, this organizational component is hugely helpful because it frees up prime real estate inside the pack while allowing you to transport some of the most necessary backpacking items securely. Knowing where your gear is stashed can make or break your experience when you arrive at your camp.

Beyond just being able to attach gear to the outside of the pack, external bungees and straps can act as an additional compression system, securing the load closer to the supportive frame of the back and your body. A great example of this is the Garnet. This pack uses adjustable Z-straps bilaterally to tamp down the load securely. We have found that the ability to compress our packs externally is helpful, especially when the packs have more advanced organizational systems. The Osprey Eja 58 also uses zigzagging straps for external compression, allowing the back to move with your body and balance instead of against it. We often notice that utilizing specific compartments can create a lopsided load, especially if you are toting a bear can. You can stay organized and explore more comfortably by having externally adhered straps and bungees to secure your gear. Another way to secure your load is with a roll-top, dry bag-like closure, just like the Flash 55 and ULA Circuit employ.

The level of organization you desire ultimately comes down to your personal preference and developing systems that work with the pack you have. Packs that offer U-zip or lateral zippers for access to the main compartment can be key when you forget to leave your rain jacket at the top of your pack to grab easily when the skies open up. The U-zip feature of the Deuter Aircontact Core is impressively easy to use. On the other hand, those extra zippers and fabric hems add weight to your pack. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the Granite Gear Blaze 60 and the ULA Circuit are great examples of how more minimalistic packs with fewer pockets can be easy to use.

Another system that we paid critical attention to when testing these packs is the hydration system. Most models include side pockets for water bottles and are compatible with a hydration bladder. We typically use both systems when we head out into the backcountry.

Drinking water is incredibly important when you are out scaling peaks and working up a sweat, especially when backpacking at altitude. Therefore, it is paramount to have easy access to your water, either via a hose that is snaked through the top of the pack and down the shoulder strap or via a bottle stashed in a side pocket — or both.

Functional side pockets are crucial for hydrating on the go. The side pockets made of stretchy mesh make it easier to get Nalgene water bottles in and out on the trailside. We favor packs with these easy-access pockets on both sides instead of only one side. Some side pockets are made of inflexible ripstop material, which tends to be more durable but less secure and can dump your belongings when you lean forward. Packs with forward-tilted side pockets make grabbing your water bottle easier, but can also place tall water bottles in the way of your elbows as you walk. When choosing your backpack, it's important to consider what types of hydration vessels you already have or are planning to get for your backpacking adventures.

Weight-to-Volume Ratio

It may seem as though the lighter the pack, the better the function, but this is not always the case. Due to the nuance that exists, we created our volume-to-weight ratio testing. This test provides numerical values that back up our findings, but keep in mind that a slightly heavier pack with stronger suspension might be best for you, as many weight-heavy features are what satisfy personal preferences.

We added to our analysis the functionality of each model as we explored the trade-offs between lighter and heavier packs. We considered whether a heavier pack may be worth it for exceptional features and functionality or greater durability, and we considered whether a lighter pack will still provide the comfort, adjustability, and longevity you need for many years of enjoying the backcountry.

First, we weighed each pack and took notes. All the backpacks in our lineup weigh between 2.7 and 4.9 pounds and range from 55 to 70 liters of carrying capacity. We wanted to see which packs best handled light, moderate, and heavy loads. We painstakingly tested each pack with a 10-pound, 19-pound, and 33-pound load, taking notes on our phones as we huffed and puffed along sprawling trail systems.

Some packs felt wobbly and unstable when loaded with a scant amount of gear, while others felt more comfortable when minimally loaded. Certain suspension systems gave the illusion of buckling beneath 30+ pounds when we added our luxury backpacking items. Others took on even more weight with relative ease — like the Osprey Aura AG and the super-hauling Gregory Deva.

While we love some of the impressively light models, some sacrifice comfortable extras and trim favorite features to achieve their low weights. For example, the Granite Gear Blaze 60 weighs just 3 pounds with a 60-liter capacity, giving it an excellent weight-to-volume ratio. And while our male testers love this pack, our female testers found that it struggled to comfortably accommodate taller ladies, and its lack of ventilation as a result of its tent-like textile left many a sweaty back.

The REI Flash is a great example of a back with a back-to-basics style. It offers comfort but without an overbuilt frame. The result is a smaller-feeling backpack that is great for shorter trips or adventurers looking to explore without bringing the kitchen sink. The Flash weighs just 2.7 pounds when all its optional features are attached to the pack. Removing these extras (like the pocket specifically for a phone and the hip belt pockets) makes it possible to drop that pack weight to just 2 pounds.

Also weighing in at the 2.7-pound mark is one of our all-around favorite packs, the Osprey Eja. The Eja offers slightly more padding, ventilation, and overall comfort than the Flash, but both packs are as trail-ready as you are. The more massive packs often provide more support and comfort, so we refuse to recommend lightweight packs for all outright. If you like bringing heavy or copious amounts of gear, the additional support of a well-built pack is worth its added weight. The Gregory Deva and Osprey Ariel weigh 4.7 and 4.8 pounds, respectively. Both have strong support systems and burly frames. Their additional architecture and deliberate suspension systems allow heavy loads to be carried comfortably.

Many heavier packs come with more compartments and special features for organization. If you know you struggle to keep your gear straight while on the trail, adding extra weight for specified compartments is a great idea. On the flip side, if you are motivated by an ultralight trail life and are happy to tote your goods in more of a haul bag style pack, these extra pockets and straps may be just extra pounds and ounces for you.

The ULA Circuit borders on being an ultralight pack, weighing 2.7 pounds. (If you're interested in going ultralight, see our best ultralight backpack review.) With a 68-liter capacity, it is a gear-hauling beast. It has a sturdy and close-fitting frame that remains reasonably supportive, even beneath heavy loads. The Circuit offers fewer organizational and customizable features but can haul massive amounts of gear, giving it one of the best weight-to-volume ratios in our lineup.

Adjustability

Getting a pack fit to your unique build and packing style is critical when wearing your house on your back, especially for days on end. Most backpacking packs for women come in multiple sizes, just like clothing. However, many offer additional adjustment options that allow you to tailor the fit more specifically to your precise size and shape. We pulled in as many friends as possible to help test the full range of sizes for each pack in our lineup. Every pack's sizing adjustments were tested on women of diverse heights, builds, shapes, and sizes. We found that some packs are easy to adjust on the go if they don't feel quite right, while others take more time and effort. Packs that scored well in this category allowed for a full range of adjustments.

The Osprey Aura AG and Ariel scored highly in this metric since they offer different compression adjustments and are easy to adjust on the fly. The Deva is a size-inclusive pack but requires plenty of muscle and extra time to adjust fully — some of that velcro is tough! We found packs with wide back panels to be less comfortable on smaller testers, while packs with smaller back panels could accommodate a wider variety of shapes.

During testing, we found the Big Agnes Garnet takes more effort to adjust, but its multiple height options ensure a near-perfect fit on a range of body sizes. The REI Flash is easy to adjust on the go and suits smaller-body types well because of its unimposing frame. The Deuter Aircontact Core adjusts via sliding mechanisms that allow for fine-tuning the size, which can help you pinpoint your fit. The Osprey Renn and Eja have the same length adjustment mechanism that makes it easy to switch between five different heights on the side of the trail as your load changes throughout the duration of your trip.

Those with curvier hips will appreciate models with extra waist belt adjustability in extendable padding, such as the Gregory Maven, Osprey Aura AG, and Osprey Ariel. Another bump in adjustability went to the Aura and Ariel because they both have extendable shoulder straps that are great for bigger-chested ladies to ensure that the straps fit properly without rubbing.

It is standard for packs to have adjustable shoulder straps and sternum straps that slide vertically up and down sternum rails. On female-specific packs, the shoulder straps are typically tapered toward the centerline. While we cannot speak for all women, this tapering, combined with multiple adjustment points, is generally very accommodating. As always, we recommend trying packs on before making the purchase, but we remain satisfied with the inclusivity of most of the women's backpacking backpacks we tested.

Why Buy a Women's Pack?

We tested packs designed specifically for a woman's body shape or that offer interchangeable components to get the right fit for women. Many brands, like Osprey, Granite Gear, and Gregory, offer a men's version of the same pack. The most significant differences between men's backpacking packs and women's packs are the shape of hip belts and shoulder straps.

Women's backpacks are designed to fit the “average” female torso better. The shoulder straps and back panels are narrower, which leads to better biomechanics when hauling loads of gear up a mountainside. The hip belts of female-specific packs are typically curved or molded for curvier bodies, and the adjustment options are often within a smaller size range for women. When combined with the expertly designed suspension, this hip belt style allows the pack's weight to rest predominately on the hips as it should.

Recently, our testers have noticed slight differences in how loads are carried between packs. Since women typically have lower centers of gravity than men, these minute differences can spell major differences in comfort when packs are loaded to the gills. women's specific designs will sometimes optimize load carrying with a lower, wider bag. By holding the bulk of the weight closer to our centers of gravity, we can feel more steady and stable on the trail. These fit and sizing changes often make a women's specific model more comfortable and better fitting than a men's or unisex model.

Most women will find a women's specific pack to offer a better fit, but just because you identify as a woman and the pack says “women” doesn't mean it will be the right fit for you. Women with larger frames and broader shoulders may find men's models to fit them better, and men with narrower shoulders or curvier builds may find a more comfortable fit from a woman's pack. With any pack, it is worth spending the time to get the correct size and shape for your body. When it comes to backpacking, one size does not fit all. See our How to Choose a Women's Backpacking Backpack article to determine what you're looking for before taking to your local gear shop.

Conclusion

The right pack will determine whether you enjoy your outdoor experience or suffer annoyance and discomfort. However, choosing the right pack can be difficult. Consider your priorities for packing and your intended environments and seasons. Have an expert measure your torso length to recommend the right-sized pack, then try on your options before purchasing — or make sure the website you're buying from has a good return policy if the pack doesn't fit how you'd hoped. We hope that our hands-on, extensive testing has provided helpful insight into your search through the expansive world of women's backpacking packs.