We buy all the products we test — no freebies from companies. If you purchase through our links, we may earn a commission, which helps support our testing.
Looking for a new trail running shoe? No matter if you're new to running, looking to explore new trails for the first time, or seeking to PR in your next wilderness ultra, the right pair of trail running shoes can transform your journey from a slog to a ride.
The shoe we recommend to most people is the Saucony Peregrine 15. The Peregrines are exceptionally comfortable, affordable, stable, and have good traction across a variety of surfaces.
For newer runners and those sticking to a more modest budget, we recommend the Hoka Torrent 4, which is comfy for miles of wear and can handle most trails you put in front of them.
Since 2013, our team of experts has tested hundreds of trail running shoes. Whether it be dreamy desert singletrack to muddy winter slogs, our team is out there racking up the mileage to see which are worth raving about. Back in the lab, we cut open every pair to see what's really going on inside. Whether you like short lunch runs in nearby parks or adventures deep into the mountains, we can help you find the best pair of trail running shoes for your specific needs and budget.
Editor's Note: This review was updated on February 12, 2026, after testing the Brooks Cascadia 19 and Hoka Challenger 8.
The Saucony Peregrine 15 hits the sweet spot of performance and value. Its light design, responsive cushioning, and stability make it a great option for all types of runners. The improved midsole uses a softer blend of EVA foam compared to previous versions, adding a touch more squish to the ride while keeping the stack height in check at 28mm in the heel and 24mm in the forefoot. This restraint in stack height helps maintain the nimble, ground-connected feel that has made the Peregrine line a favorite among technical trail runners. The outsole also received attention, with added rubber coverage to better protect against sharp rocks. It's this blend of comfort, protection, and versatility that helps boost it into our top recommendation.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
31 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
4 mm
Rock Plate
Forefoot Rock Guard
Measured Lug Depth
5.1 mm
Measured Weight
10.11 oz
Those less accustomed to low drop should potentially consider a different model. At 4mm this is one of the lower drops in our lineup, and while it leads to confidence and stability, long distances or high elevation gain could be a complaint for some. Runners transitioning from higher drop shoes should allow adequate time for their calves and Achilles tendons to adapt. I find the Peregrine hits a sweet spot for your average daily run, but for race day and long distance ultras you'll want something with a bit more structure and comfort. If you want a shoe that will help continue to develop your skills and feel great when doing it, give the Peregrine 15 a try.
A wider platform under the heel increases stability when landing
A tapered profile makes these surprisingly agile
Great energy transfer with cushioning
CONS
Stiff over technical trails
Potential durability issues with the outsole
We were excited to test the new updates to the Torrent 4, which offer up a well-rounded trail shoe that costs less than most. Increasing the stack and cushioning of the fourth version of the Torrent makes this model feel similar to an out-of-the-box Speedgoat 4 or 5, which we love. This latest iteration still retains its ultralight sensation of support and agility. In addition, the outsole got an overhaul and now features directional lugs that provide better traction in technical terrain. The upper is comfortable and breathable, allowing for friction-free long runs. For runners seeking premium performance without the premium price tag, the Torrent 4 represents one of the best values in the current market.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
31 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
5 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
4.3 mm
Measured Weight
9.40 oz
The lateral rigidity of the Torrent 4 is less ideal in technical terrain, so we'd recommend this shoe for easy to moderate terrain at high speeds. It can be pushed harder thanks to its lower stack height, but many runners will prefer a slightly less stiff shoe in loose and off-camber situations. For this, we'd recommend the Hoka Speedgoat 6 or Nnormal Tomir 2.0. That said, over moderate trails, the Torrent 4 remains one of our favorite options.
Excellent stability on moderate to technical terrain
Improved comfort over the Cascadia 18
Robust toe protection
Durable and reliable platform
CONS
Heavier than most trail shoes
Not ideal for faster efforts
The Brooks Cascadia 19 builds on the durability and reliability the Cascadia line is known for, while refining comfort and runnability. This latest iteration introduces nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 foam that delivers a springier, more comfortable ride without sacrificing the planted feel that Cascadia loyalists expect. Traction, stability, and foot protection remain defining traits, but this iteration feels less rigid and more comfortable right out of the box. With a 34 mm heel stack and 7 mm drop, the relatively low and grounded platform creates a supportive and predictable ride. Combined with the shoe's wide base, Active Foot Frame, and Trail Adapt system (which functions as both a rock plate and stability mechanism), the Cascadia 19 excels at keeping the foot centered and supported over long distances.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
36 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
8 mm
Rock Plate
Yes
Measured Lug Depth
3.5 mm
Measured Weight
11.13 oz
Compared to the Cascadia 18, the 19's stability feels slightly less rigid and more forgiving, particularly as fatigue sets in. The redesigned chevron lug pattern on the TrailTack Green rubber outsole provides dependable traction across varied conditions without feeling overly aggressive on harder surfaces. While the shoe isn't crazy nimble, runners who prioritize security and consistency will appreciate this platform. The engineered mesh upper is breathable and resilient, with reduced overlays creating a lighter, more streamlined fit. Lockdown through the midfoot and heel is secure and confidence-inspiring. The non-gusseted tongue stays in place well during runs, and the fit feels slightly roomier than its predecessor, particularly in the toe box. At 11.13 ounces per shoe, the weight is noticeable when accelerating, but for ultrarunners, hikers, and those prioritizing reliability over agility, the Cascadia 19 remains one of the most dependable trail shoes available.
It's no surprise that world-renowned mountaineer and trail runner Kilian Jornet would create an ultralight model as his first shoe after departing Salomon. The Nnormal Kjerag is the lightest trail shoe we've ever tested, by over an ounce per shoe, and we are impressed with its comfort and performance. Nnormal has stripped back the excess, creating cushioning that follows today's trend without sacrificing the stiffness that is crucial for precision running. The TPEE foam midsole is a standout feature, enabling incredibly low weight while maintaining connection to the trail. The midsole transfers more energy than the competition, but this can also beat you up faster than plush designs. A leading concept at Nnormal is durability, and the craftsmanship is clear in this design. While it's expensive, we feel good knowing this shoe should last for a long time.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
25 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
8 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
3.0 mm
Measured Weight
8.05 oz
The Kjerag will be most appealing to advanced runners, and if you're tempted by these features, we think you'll love this shoe. That said, we wouldn't recommend this as your only trainer. As we mentioned, the firm cushioning can and will beat you up over time. This is especially noticeable when you are running with tired or dead legs. The Kjerag requires a lot of input and concentration to drive, so as soon as you relax, the shoe lacks traction and comfort. For those looking to tackle the most technical terrain, we'd opt for something more substantial, like the highly tractioned Salomon Speedcross 6. But for runners wanting to set a PR or simply feel fast, this is our favorite model.
Less stable in technical terrain, but best of the super shoes
Expensive
The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro excels as their top running shoe, blending technical support with super shoe performance. Its nitrogen-infused foam offers springy cushion, and the secure knit upper provides an excellent fit, though snug for high-volume feet. The comfortable midsole and effective 3.8 mm lugged outsole deliver versatile traction on various terrains, with sticky Frixion White XF 2.0 rubber enhancing grip. This shoe has seen great success at recent ultra trail races, with runners praising its ability to maintain technical performance while offering exceptional energy return. While stable on technical trails, the softer midsole and lack of carbon plate differentiate it from other super shoes. Lightweight at 9.79 ounces per shoe (men's US size 10.5), it offers great foot protection and a fast feel, making it a strong crossover option for varied long runs and races.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
29 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
5 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
3.8 mm
Measured Weight
9.79 oz
For those who are in the market for maximum forward momentum, a carbon plate will still edge out the Prodigio Pro in terms of energy return. However, what you gain in propulsion, you lose in technicality on rocky and steep terrain. The Prodigio Pro is our pick when runs explore many terrain surfaces, from roads to ridgelines, purely because it maintains its technical prowess while still offering exceptional energy return. The lack of a plate actually works in its favor on technical descents where you need to feel the terrain beneath you.
The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro is one of the best 'super shoe' models we've tested and can actually keep up in technical terrain. Credit: Matthew Richardson
If it ain't broke, don't fix it is the mantra Salomon lives by regarding the legendary Speedcross line. The newest iteration, the Salomon Speedcross 6, includes minor design tweaks that improve upon the already great platform without reinventing the wheel. Long known for its aggressive outsole and unrivaled traction, designers modified the rubber compound to improve performance in muddy conditions. They fine-tuned the sagittate lug pattern for an even better grip on mud, rock, and everything in between. The 5.5mm lugs dig into soft terrain like nothing else in our lineup, making this the go-to choice for runners who regularly encounter wet, loose, or unpredictable surfaces. This new version is slightly lighter than the previous model, updating the upper to include more mesh for improved breathability. But don't worry, the Speedcross 6 still offers a glove-like fit straight out of the box. We're fast approaching a decade of running in this line of shoes, and our heart only grows fonder for this beloved trail runner.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
33 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
12 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
5.5 mm
Measured Weight
11.08 oz
Despite our gushing, we still have a few criticisms of this specialty shoe. Our biggest carry-over complaint between the previous version and the Speedcross 6 is the overly assertive and outdated drop design. With a thick heel counter and an exceptionally large heel-to-toe drop, this shoe is particularly unstable when running downhill. Although the breathability has improved by tweaking the type of mesh over the instep and forefoot, the Speedcross is better deployed during the cold weather months or high-altitude runs through the mountains. On the flip side, with other, less supportive, and less comfortable shoes pushing into its weight class, we no longer complain about the heft of the Speedcross 6. If weight is a big deal for you, the Nnormal Tomir 2.0 weighs slightly less and has traction nearly as incredible as the Speedcross. At the end of the day, there is no better option for those who like to run off-trail, over snowy mountains, through muddy river bottoms, and up steep, rocky crags than the Speedcross 6.
Odds are, you know about the Hoka Speedgoat 6. It's an iconic modern trail shoe that changed the way we think about cushioning. For this iteration, Hoka ditched the out-of-box broken-in feel and opted for a harder, stiffer midsole. At first, we weren't fans, but after running in this shoe for a while, it relaxed, providing similar cushioning to the previous version without diving into the too-soft, gushy feeling that earlier iterations slid toward after a few hundred miles. The upper has also been reworked, opting for a thinner mesh, which helps reduce weight and increase drying speed. Increased durability is appreciated, as previous iterations often felt mushy after the first 100-200 miles. For runners who tackle significant elevation gain and loss, the Speedgoat's combination of cushioning and traction makes it a reliable partner for everything from local trail races to hundred-mile adventures.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
32 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
6 mm
Rock Plate
No
Measured Lug Depth
4.6 mm
Measured Weight
10.58 oz
While we think these changes were largely improvements, we do think loyal fans of the Speedgoat series will be disappointed by the out-of-the-box feel. We'd suggest not judging the model by the first 50 miles and being patient with the break-in period. This stiffness is also appreciated on technical terrain, and we found less deformation of the midsole on hard rocks. Stability has also improved, and micro adjustments on technical loose terrain are more confident in this updated iteration. We also loved the Nnormal Tomir 2.0 for its springiness and excellence on technical trails, though it has a bit too much room for our feet to slide forward on the downhill (though you may not experience this issue). All in all, the newly redesigned Speedgoat 6 is still an excellent choice for long ultras and big days in the mountains.
The Altra Lone Peak 9 delivers immediate comfort straight from the box and maintains its long-standing reputation as a favorite, renowned for its durability on challenging trails. Altra's latest iteration of the Lone Peak keeps that zero-drop, roomy-toe-box magic and gives it a fresh life with a new, more durable ripstop upper, updated midsole foam for a touch more comfort, and an upgraded lug pattern for even better grip on rocky, loose, or steep trails. Thru-hikers covering immense distances consistently rely on this model, highlighting its versatility as a potential do-it-all shoe. Its zero-drop platform ensures consistent cushioning across your entire foot, while the lower stack height contributes to enhanced stability. The grounded feel lets the foot spread and flex naturally, promoting better balance and proprioception.
SPECIFICATIONS
Measured Heel Stack Height
25 mm
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop
0 mm
Rock Plate
StoneGuard plate
Measured Lug Depth
4.0 mm
Measured Weight
11.29 oz
The slightly less snug upper can allow for some movement during fast, aggressive running on uneven trails. On the other hand, if your feet often swell while you run, this characteristic is actually beneficial and enhances the breathability and overall comfort of the Lone Peak 9. Its wide toe box promotes natural toe splay, reducing fatigue, and its aggressive lugs provide reliable traction. Zero-drop designs encourage a midfoot strike pattern, which can reduce loading on the knees while demanding more from the calves and Achilles. Runners transitioning from traditional shoes should approach gradually to build the necessary lower leg strength. For those with the necessary adaptation, the Lone Peak 9 is an excellent option for blending comfort and sensitivity in technical environments. For runners preferring a low stack but needing some heel-toe drop, the Hoka Mafate Speed 4 is a noteworthy alternative.
The Lone Peak 9 has become a classic trail running shoe that features zero-drop and great comfort. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Product Comparison Table
Our lead tester, Matthew, runs thousands of mile a year, testing shoes on trails in Southwest Colorado. Credit: Matthew Richardson
How We Tested
Trail running shoe testing never ends, as companies release new models throughout the calendar year. We continue our tests in all seasons, all over the country, and often have the opportunity to compare the most current models against previous versions of the same shoe. Our testing takes us from high alpine scree fields to muddy river bottoms, from technical singletrack to smooth fire roads. Although our testers don't always log their distances with a GPS watch, they know they have collectively run thousands of miles while testing over 140 different pairs of trail running shoes in the past decade. Our testing process combines thorough research, detailed scrutiny at our testing facility in Lake Tahoe, industry knowledge, and many hours spent out on the trail. We evaluate each shoe across multiple terrain types, weather conditions, and distances to understand how they perform when fresh and when fatigued. Testing these shoes side-by-side gives us well-informed data anchored in real-world experience, and we've used that knowledge to put together this review to help you find your perfect trail sidekicks.
Stack Height Measurement Variability
You might notice that our reported stack height measurements often differ from what the various manufacturers claim. This is due to the fact that there is no industry standard for these kinds of specs. Because of that, companies can report anything, and there's no way to know where on the shoe they measured or if they included insoles or lugs in their measurements.
To have data that's actually comparable across all our tested shoes, we split every shoe we tested in half on a band saw and measured in the exact same place on each one. Our method for this is based on the requirements set by World Athletics, the governing body for running competitions.
Following their requirements, we start by measuring the internal length of the shoe before wearing it. The heel is designated as 12% of this length, and the forefoot is 75%. From there, we measure the height of the entire sole, anything between where your foot would be and the ground. This includes the tread, all the cushioning, and the insole.
Looking at a cross section of each shoe reveals a lot about why and how they may perform differently out on the trail. Credit: Abriah Wofford
Our in-depth testing process of trail running shoes is spread across six rating metrics:
Comfort and Fit (35% weighting)
Stability (25% weighting)
Traction (20% weighting)
Foot Protection (15% weighting)
Weight (5% weighting)
We put in lots of miles to test these shoes. In addition, we cut them in half in our lab to take precise measurements.
Why Trust GearLab
Over the years, we've had a pretty epic group of athletes test these trail running shoes. Currently leading that charge is Matthew Richardson, a resident of southwest Colorado who has years of experience moving through the mountains. Progressing through the region's wide range of activities, running remains his biggest passion. Some of his achievements include a day trip to the Chicago Basin 14ers and a top-ten finish at the Telluride Mountain Run, which had over 14k of vertical in 38 miles. A lover of maps, Matthew enjoys creating and exploring new routes and is always in search of the next great loop.
Chiming in from the Sierra foothills of Nevada is longtime reviewer Matt Bento, a lifelong runner since high school. Matt discovered his enthusiasm for trail running one summer while working in Yosemite Valley when temperatures hovered in the 90s, and he decided it was too hot to go climbing. He methodically logged miles and built up his endurance until he could run the Yosemite high camps loop, a 40-mile adventure through the Sierra high country. Ever since he's found many ridge runs and link-ups throughout the Sierra and believes the best runs start in the dark and end with a cheeseburger.
Adding his expert opinion to this already stacked lineup of reviewers is Aaron Rice. A New Englander whose heart was called to the mountains instead of the sea, Aaron has lived (and run) up and down the Rocky Mountains for more than 15 years, from the Flatirons of Boulder, CO, to the Tetons outside of Jackson, WY, and now in the high desert of Santa Fe, NM. As a professional ski patroller and avalanche educator, his favorite time is spent in the high alpine.
We put every pair of shoes through rigorous, comparative testing, determined to find what they each do best.
Analysis and Test Results
During our discussion of testing metrics and shoe performance, please keep in mind that all ratings and comparisons are made in relation to the other tested products. We carefully select and purchase only the most highly rated products, so the competition is fierce. A shoe with a low score can still be a great option, depending on your personal needs and budget. The trail running market has never been more competitive, with brands pushing boundaries in foam technology, outsole design, and upper construction. Within our in-depth reviews, we break down each metric individually so that you can more easily tune into the pros and cons of each specific trail running shoe. If you are new to trail running and unsure of what you should look for in a shoe, it is always good to take a moment to consider your foot shape, running style, and any athletic goals you may have. Understanding how you run, where you run, and what distances you typically cover will help narrow down the options considerably.
Worse Value
Better Value
What's the Best Value?
A significant consideration when selecting a pair of trail running shoes is the value of the purchase. While one could simply assume that you get what you pay for, years of testing have proven that this isn't always true. When considering the value of a trail running shoe, three aspects are essential: price, performance, and longevity (i.e., durability).
If you're looking for some serious performance but don't want to break the bank, check out the Saucony Peregrine 15, which blends excellent comfort, durability, and responsiveness at a reasonable price tag. This is our top recommendation for those who want a light, snappy shoe that excels at distances between 10-30 miles. The Peregrine has bucked the trend of increasingly tall stack heights by keeping the thickness in check, which helps maintain that nimble, connected feel without sacrificing cushioning where it counts.
The Saucony Peregrine 15 is an excellent option for those who prioritize value and comfort. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The third aspect of value for a trail running shoe, longevity, is not nearly as easy to quantify. Since all shoes eventually wear out and need to be replaced, finding those that can withstand more miles of abuse before disintegrating helps determine that shoe's value. Unfortunately, every runner puts a different amount of strain on their shoes, so their lifetime varies widely. We certainly put each batch of test shoes through the wringer, and durability issues often present themselves early on. We have been particularly impressed with the durable craftsmanship of the Nnormal Kjerag, though they don't come cheap. The premium materials and construction justify the higher price point for runners who demand longevity from their footwear.
Despite being mind-blowingly lightweight, the Kjerag also appears to be impressively durable. Which is good, because it's expensive. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Comfort and Fit
Comfort is a challenging criterion to rate because it is so subjective. Everyone's foot is different, and a shoe that feels amazing to one person could be unwearable by another. Foot shape varies dramatically from runner to runner, with differences in arch height, heel width, forefoot volume, and toe length all affecting how a shoe fits and feels. Some products are wide in the toe box while narrow in the heel, and some are just really narrow (or wide) throughout. Some fit perfectly “to size,” while others run slightly long or short. We offer our take on each pair's size relative to the “average” fit of a trail running shoe.
Try Before You Buy
Comfort is probably the single most important criterion when it comes to selecting a running shoe, or any footwear for that matter, and we recommend you take time to find the right fit above all other factors when selecting a pair of shoes.
To assess each shoe, we run dozens of miles in every pair. We consider underfoot cushioning and responsiveness, we scrutinize tongue comfort and lace feel, and we examine heel collars and all-around foot feel. Craftsmanship plays a prominent role in comfort, as poorly sewn seams or mismatched material overlap can cause rubbing spots. We evaluate how each shoe compares in length and width to the “average fit” of any given running shoe of that size.
Though comfort is ultimately subjective, our tests pitted each shoe side by side, and our recommendations and scores are based on the performance of each shoe relative to the “hypothetical average shoe” to help you get a better idea of what will fit your feet.
We compile our experiences on long runs over a variety of terrain types. We run through streams and rivers to gauge how much water each pair absorbs and how quickly it can shed that water afterward. We cover rolling trails, steep ups and downs, and loose talus, all of which demand different things from the fit of your shoes.
The Brooks Catamount 4 excels at providing stability and comfort in a lightweight package. Credit: Matthew Richardson
It is no surprise that the shoes with the plushest padding often feel the most comfortable right out of the box. The Salomon Speedcross 6 and Saucony Peregrine 15 are some of the most comfortable models, particularly for those who often run in rugged, mountainous terrain. The Brooks Catamount 4 is so comfy we found ourselves wearing them for all sorts of non-running activities.
The Ultraventure 4 is comfortable for trail runs and all-day hikes. Credit: Matthew Richardson
For users wanting maximum comfort while blending running and hiking, we'd recommend the Topo Ultraventure 4. Its generous ZipFoam cushioning (a blend of EVA and TPU) ensures comfort over long distances, while the shoe's versatile design allows it to transition effortlessly between trails and roads. The Brooks Cascadia 19 also deserves mention here as comfort is one of its most noticeable improvements over the previous version. Step-in feel is immediately plush, eliminating the break-in period we experienced with the Cascadia 18. The fit feels slightly roomier, particularly in the toe box, while still providing the structure and support Cascadia users expect.
The Cascadia 19 is best suited for ultrarunners, hikers, and those who prioritize reliability and protection over agility. Credit: Matthew Richardson
For this round of testing, the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 received high marks for its comfort and stability. I've always appreciated shoes that can provide both comfort and responsiveness. While I wouldn't recommend the Pegasus for ultra length distances, it's an excellent option for around the 3 hour mark.
The Nike Pegasus Trail 5 provides a great blend of cushioning and responsiveness that's great for speedy tempo runs on moderate terrain. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The La Sportiva Prodigio Pro impressed us with its knit upper fit. Generally, we find knit uppers to be a miss, often leaving loose fabric that is better tackled by a standard tongue design. That's not the case with the Prodigio Pro. Its fit is excellent and provides some of the best comfort without sacrificing security. Those with high-volume feet may find the knit upper too snug for their liking, but we found the fit to be just right. If you're looking for a super shoe that excels in technical terrain, definitely check out this model.
The Prodigio Pro excels at providing stable energy return in technical and loose situations. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Hoka Challenger 8 continues Hoka's road-to-trail design philosophy with a focus on plush cushioning for recovery runs and easy mileage. Step-in feel is immediately accommodating, and the upper is soft and irritation-free. However, compared to its predecessor, the Challenger 8 has shifted further toward cushioning with noticeable trade-offs in stability. The taller 38mm heel stack and softer foam create a ride that feels less controlled on uneven terrain. If you primarily run on flat roads and smooth gravel paths, the Challenger 8 delivers excellent comfort, but those who frequently encounter technical or cambered trails may find it less confidence-inspiring than the previous version.
The Hoka Challenger 8 shifts further toward cushioning with a taller, softer platform that prioritizes comfort over stability and ground connection. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Stability
Trail running takes place over uneven ground, and being able to land and push off from a platform that is stable both longitudinally and laterally is a critical feature of how well a shoe performs. Unlike road running where surfaces are predictable, trail runners constantly encounter rocks, roots, cambered terrain, and loose surfaces that challenge balance with every step. Failure to maintain stability through the running stride will lead to either losing traction and slipping or, even worse, rolling an ankle and causing an injury. Through extensive testing over many years, we have found that stability is impacted mainly by the following four factors: stack height, heel-toe drop, landing platform, and the width/fit of the upper.
Stability in a pair of shoes starts with your stride and foot placement, combines with your trail conditions, and includes the physical characteristics of each shoe. It's those characteristics that we test to see which are better suited to the task of keeping you stable in trying conditions.
The stack height represents how much material rests between the ground and your foot. In most cases, the larger the stack height, the greater the chance for a rolled ankle, although this threat can be mitigated by having a broader landing platform, as determined by the shape of the bottom of the shoe. A wider platform typically ensures better stability, while a narrower platform is less stable. Heel-toe drop measures the difference in stack height between the heel and the toes. The upper is the third basic component of a shoe, aside from the outsole and midsole, and is what we look at as the “body” of a shoe. A shoe with an upper that firmly holds your foot allows you to land squarely on top of the footbed, minimizing movement within the shoe.
A more rigid platform helps give great stability to the ankles, knees, and hips. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Over the last many years, shoe companies, mainly in response to customer demand, have been slowly lowering the average heel-toe drop, which today rests around 6-9 mm. Shoes with a substantial drop, like the Salomon Speedcross 6, can be less stable on uneven off-camber terrain, particularly when combined with narrower outsoles or a loose fit. Shoes with little to no drop, like the Lone Peak 9 or Nnormal Kjerag, are often more stable, especially when they have wide landing platforms and a secure fit. Research suggests that lower drop shoes may reduce knee extension moments by encouraging a midfoot strike pattern, though these benefits require adequate lower leg strength and gradual adaptation to realize.
The Lone Peak has zero-drop, and was one of the first to pioneer this new take. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Another critical factor for stability is the firmness of the midsole. Very stiff shoes tend to be more stable than soft and pliable ones. A flexible shoe that can easily bend in any direction allows your foot to take the shape of what it lands upon, but this is not generally the most stable design. We have accustomed ourselves to walking on flat surfaces, and a shoe that provides this feels more stable, especially if you are stepping on a very uneven surface like rocks and roots. The platform of the versatile La Sportiva Bushido III ticks all of these boxes. With a low heel stack height, a rigid midsole, and a specialized heel cup, this shoe creates a strong connection between all our leg joints, resulting in one of the most stable performances we've found.
The Bushido III has an excellent combination of secure fit, rigid midsole, and low stack height, resulting in an impressively stable ride. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Brooks Cascadia 19 exemplifies what a stability-focused trail shoe should be. Our lab measured a heel stack of 34 mm with a 7 mm drop, creating a relatively low and grounded platform compared to many modern trail shoes. Combined with its wide base, Active Foot Frame, and Trail Adapt system, the result is a supportive and predictable ride on moderate to technical terrain. Compared to the Cascadia 18, stability feels slightly less rigid and more forgiving, particularly as fatigue sets in, an improvement that doesn't sacrifice the shoe's confidence-inspiring planted feel. The Ballistic Rock Shield underfoot adds another layer of stability by preventing the midsole from deforming around sharp objects.
The Brooks Cascadia 19 refines comfort and runnability while maintaining the stability, protection, and durability the line is known for. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Traction
If it weren't for the drastically increased performance regarding traction, there would not be much incentive to purchase trail shoes over a pair of running shoes for pavement. Based on this assessment, one can understand the argument that traction is one of the most important aspects of a trail running shoe. The ability to confidently push off on a climb, brake on a descent, and navigate wet rocks or slippery roots separates a good trail running experience from a frustrating or dangerous one.
This total metric score includes input from each shoe's traction performance across a wide range of surfaces, with preference for the more typical dry hardpack trails most runners traverse.
Three main factors contribute to a shoe's ability to grip a variety of surfaces well: the type of lugs, the shape and spacing of the lugs, and the properties of the rubber used. Deeper, more aggressive lugs grip most surfaces better, especially steep dirt, grass, mud, and snow. More and more trail running shoes reflect this, with lugs becoming increasingly more aggressive across the board. Rubber compounds have also evolved significantly, with brands developing proprietary formulations that optimize the balance between grip, durability, and weight. It's worth noting that all of the shoes we test offer pretty solid traction, especially on your standard, dry, hardpacked, dirt trail.
Traction Ratings Across Various Surfaces
Product
Loose Trail
Mud
Slick Rock
Nnormal Tomir 2.0
5
5
5
Salomon Speedcross 6
5
5
5
Hoka Speedgoat 6
4
3
4
La Sportiva Bushido III
4
3
4
Altra Lone Peak 9
4
4
3
Hoka Torrent 4
3
3
3
Topo Ultraventure 4
3
3
3
Saucony Peregrine 15
3
3
3
La Sportiva Prodigio Pro
3
3
3
Brooks Cascadia 19
3
3
3
Nnormal Kjerag
3
2
3
Hoka Challenger 8
2
3
3
Brooks Catamount 4
2
2
2
Nike Pegasus Trail 5
2
2
2
Asics Trabuco Max 4
2
1
1
Pulling out just the “crud” terrain paints a different picture of shoe performance. If you frequently run through the muck, high-scoring models in this chart might be a better fit for your routes.
Lugs that are close together tend to do a better job of gripping well on rock and hard dirt surfaces, while lugs that are further apart usually shed mud faster. Deeper lugs can increase hold depending on their shape, distance between, and substrate you're running on. The deepest lugs in our lineup are the Salomon Speedcross 6 (5.5 mm), the Nnormal Tomir 2.0 (5.0 mm), and the Saucony Peregrine 15 (5.1 mm).
The new improved rubber compound on the Peregrine 15 is stickier and more durable than previous models. Credit: Natalie Kafader
The Salomon Speedcross 6 offers the best all-around traction we've found. It's an ideal shoe for just about every trail and mountain condition. It's one of the few shoes that tackled sloppy shoulder season snow with ease. Mud, slippery roots, and wet rocks couldn't stop these impressively grippy shoes. And, with a well-designed lug pattern, the Speedcross also holds its own on loose, dry trails, to boot.
The Speedcross 6 is a powerhouse of traction, keeping us steady on our feet through fields of sticky mud, across lingering patches of snow, and on freshly rained-on rocks. Credit: Jill Rice
Another pair we found ourselves reaching for when the going got tough is the Nnormal Tomir 2.0. This shoe offers a truly amazing blend of speed, comfort, and traction. Both the Tomir 2.0 and the Nnormal Kjerag provide exceptional traction for their intended uses, and we enjoy running on the grippy, lightweight Vibram LiteBase outsoles (which are also found on other shoes in our lineup). The LiteBase technology allows Vibram to reduce rubber thickness while maintaining grip performance, contributing to weight savings without sacrificing traction.
Best for mountain running and technical terrain the Tomir 2.0 is a great addition to our shoe rotation and we continue to love running in these each time we put them on. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Our only complaint about the Tomir 2.0 is that we often shifted forward in the shoe when tackling steep downhills at speed. You can read more about this in the comfort section of the Tomir's review.
Our only downside of the Tomir 2.0 is that our foot tended to shift forward into the toecap when descending steep slopes. This reduced once the shoe broke in and go a more pronounced rocker locking us into the heel cup. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Brooks Cascadia 19 continues to deliver reliable traction with its 3.5 mm lugs paired with TrailTack Green outsole rubber. Rather than relying on deep, aggressive lugs, traction is driven by surface contact, rubber compound, and the shoe's stable platform. Grip is confident on dirt, gravel, and rocky terrain, particularly when climbing and descending. For runners who don't need the most aggressive lug pattern but want dependable grip across varied conditions, the Cascadia strikes an effective balance.
The Cascadia 19 features TrailTack Green rubber and 3.5 mm lugs provide that provides grip on dirt, gravel, and rocky terrain. Credit: Matt Lighthart
Foot Protection
Trail running is a demanding sport, both on your feet and shoes. We've determined that the most important criterion for evaluating a trail running shoe is how well it protects your foot. The soles of the feet are among the most sensitive areas of your body, so if you intend to traverse rocky and uneven terrain, then your shoe will need adequate underfoot protection. A single sharp rock striking an unprotected foot can end a run immediately, while inadequate cushioning over long distances leads to cumulative fatigue and discomfort.
We consider a variety of protective features and perform a ton of intensive tests to arrive at these final scores for each shoe's overall foot protection.
While almost all modern running shoes have an outsole and midsole, underfoot protection typically comes in one of two forms: a rock plate made of a plastic or composite material that adds rigidity to the shoe and absorbs impacts, or thick foam cushioning (a few trail runners now have carbon fiber plates that can also add propulsion). The most common type of foam used is EVA, which protects the foot from protrusions and absorbs a significant amount of the impact inherent to running before it travels upward into the body. The foam landscape has evolved rapidly, with supercritical foams like nitrogen-infused EVA, TPU variants, and TPEE compounds becoming increasingly common even at mid-range price points. These newer materials typically offer improved energy return and durability compared to traditional EVA.
Ample underfoot foam (like the ultrathick 41 mm heel stack of the Trabuco Max 4, pictured here) provide great underfoot protection. Credit: Matthew Richardson
A lesser component of foot protection is how well the upper protects the top and sides of your feet from protrusions like sticks or abrasion by rocks. The ends of the toes are a common point of abuse, as we have all accidentally kicked a rock while bombing down a trail. Rigid toe bumpers go a long way in helping to alleviate this pain, and the Brooks Cascadia 19 offers some of the best toe box protection available. The toe cap is robust and extends farther around the front of the shoe than previous versions, offering improved rock protection without feeling overly bulky. Many manufacturers skimp on upper materials to save weight and offer more breathability and water drainage, while some have uppers as mighty as a bulletproof vest. But if you end up with a beloved shoe whose one downfall is a more delicate upper, you can always wear gaiters to supplement.
The Brooks Cascadia 19 delivers improved comfort and a smoother ride without sacrificing the stability, protection, and durability Cascadia fans expect. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Challenger 8 with extra cushioning absorbs impacts and protects against trail hazards, trading sensitivity for comfort. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Hoka shoes are known for their thick underfoot stacks, with midsole foam that is dense and highly absorbent. The Hoka Challenger 8 offers solid foot protection thanks to its increased stack height over the previous version, measuring 38mm at the heel. With no rock plate, protection relies on cushioning, which effectively prevents bottoming out and shields against sharp debris on moderate terrain. For a more stripped-down option that still provides superb underfoot protection, the Hoka Torrent 4 is worth considering.
The knit upper on the Prodigio Pro is the best we've tested - the fit is snug and secure. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Both the models from La Sportiva we've tested offer great foot protection. The Prodigio Pro and Bushido III provide tank-like protection with padded tongues, toe bumpers, and rock plates that make them perfect options for demanding runs in the mountains. For gravel road runners looking for maximum energy transfer with extra protection for long days, we'd recommend the Asics Trabuco Max 4.
The low stack on the La Sportiva Bushido 3 helps create an incredible sensation of stability, the highest of any shoe we've tested. This rigidity really increases the foot protection making it one of the most protective in our lineup. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Weight
We love to consider, measure, and compare shoe weight because all of life is a battle against gravity. The less weight burdening you, the freer you are to move around and push the limits of your sport. When running, you repeatedly pick your feet up to move them forward, so the weight on your feet does matter. Studies have shown that every 100 grams of shoe weight can affect running economy by approximately 1%, which adds up over the course of a long run or race. However, trail running shoes throw a wrench in this equation when you consider that the features added onto a shoe to improve performance may also contribute to a higher weight.
These weights are per shoe, measured in US men's size 10.5.
For instance, thicker and burlier midsoles with rock plates are heavier, but they protect the feet more. Cut out too much of this protection, and you will surely end up with a super-light shoe, but you will also have to moderate your speed significantly to avoid damaging your feet. The takeaway is that lighter is better, but only if it doesn't compromise functionality. The shoes described here naturally fall within a spectrum when considering these two factors, and which end of the spectrum you fall on is entirely a personal choice. Advances in foam technology have helped brands reduce weight without sacrificing cushioning, though the lightest shoes still require trade-offs in protection or durability.
The Nnormal Kjerag are fantastic, exceptionally lightweight shoes for technical terrain and inclines. Credit: Matthew Richardson
The Nnormal Kjerag, weighing in at only 8.05 ounces for a men's size 10.5 US, is the lightest shoe in our review by well over an ounce per shoe. Despite this featherlight weight, it still manages to feel durable and substantial, and is great for race and uptempo training days. The TPEE foam midsole is largely responsible for this achievement, enabling incredibly low weight while maintaining adequate cushioning and energy return. If comfort-first cushioning is your priority and you're willing to accept added weight, the Hoka Challenger 8 (10.17 ounces) delivers plush step-in feel for recovery runs and easy mileage, though the weight increase over its predecessor is noticeable during faster efforts.
At 10.17 ounces, the Challenger 8 is noticeably heavier than the Challenger 7 without corresponding improvements in stability or traction. Credit: Matt Lighthart
With an upgraded, lightened design, the Hoka Torrent 4 (9.40 ounces) is one of our favorites for long distances, where its low weight helps stave off fatigue. For the super shoes, the clear standout is the La Sportiva Prodigio Pro, weighing 9.79 oz. This has an excellent feel on a variety of terrain and can feel as impressive as rock hopping or opening it up on paved roads. For runners seeking stability without excessive weight, the Brooks Cascadia 19 at 11.13 ounces represents a reasonable trade-off, with most of that weight contributing to protective features that pay dividends on rugged terrain.
Though not the lightest, the Cascadia 19 offers protection and durability for the extra ounces. Credit: Matthew Richardson
Other Trail Running Shoes to Consider
Hoka Mafate Speed 4 If you're looking for responsive cushioning for ultra-distance marathons, this is one of my highest recommendations. The light platform reduces long-distance fatigue and provides great stability without ever feeling clunky or overbearing. The combination of Hoka's signature cushioning with a more responsive foam compound makes this an excellent choice for runners who want protection without sacrificing speed. If you're looking for a fast, cushioned shoe that feels agile, seriously consider this model. As with most Hoka shoes expect them to wear out a little sooner, a price to pay for the excellent out of box comfort.
Norda 002 The Norda 002 stood out as one of the best overall performers in our testing. Its biggest strength is comfort from the upper's fit, with advanced materials that make it feel great without giving up stability or precision on technical ground. The Norda x Vibram SLE midsole hits a sweet spot too: responsive and lively, but not overly stiff or punishing on long runs like some others. Vibram nailed it here, and it's easily our favorite midsole we've tested to date. It's pricey, but for runners who want a single shoe that can truly do it all, the 002 makes a strong case as a one-shoe quiver. The bio-based Dyneema upper is virtually indestructible, and the construction quality justifies the investment for serious runners.
Hoka Tecton X 3 We prefer the non-knit second version of the Tecton series but there is still a runner who could benefit from this version of the Tecton. Best for more technical terrain, the Tecton has less cushioning than other carbon models we've tested. The tighter fit of the upper provides good stability with a more enhanced rocker providing higher performance and turnover. Those that like a more natural running experience may find the Tecton overbuilt.
Nike Ultrafly A carbon option more suitable for wider/high volume feet. We'd recommend the Ultrafly for more tame trails as the outsole has small lug depth. For those that want excellent cushioning without sacrificing responsiveness, this shoe delivers a plush yet propulsive ride. The wider last accommodates feet that struggle with the narrower fit of many carbon-plated competitors. Pricey, but well built with excellent materials. This would be a great option for long runs or more runnable ultras where the terrain doesn't demand aggressive traction.
Conclusion
Being fully equipped with the best running gear is key to having a great run, and the right shoes are just the beginning. We've put the top running shorts to the test to find which ones can actually go the distance. We've donned dozens of pairs of running socks in search of the best ones for any fit and feel preference. If you often find yourself running in subpar conditions, we've also found the best-performing running jackets for all conditions.
Running on trails is an excellent way to stay fit and healthy and has just as many benefits for the mind as it does for the body. We love it for the incredible variety, the connection to nature, and most of all, we love the potential for adventure. There are many different styles and types of trail running shoes, many of which are designed for specific purposes. Whether you prioritize lightweight agility, maximalist cushioning, aggressive traction, or rock-solid stability, the current market offers excellent options across every category. We hope this article has helped you with your decision-making process and that you end up with a pair of shoes that you are happy with and can be a partner on the memorable adventures to come. Happy trails!
